From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
chang.seok.bae@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode/intel: Taint kernel on partial update
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 21:18:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708211803.402467-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630191350.3837-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
A modern individual microcode update contains firmware for many pieces of
silicon inside the CPU. Sometimes, a single update operation successfully
updates some components and not others leaving a partially-applied
update.
This may leave the system in an undefined and unreliable state. Fatal
failures are expected to be handled by the CPU itself, by raising #MC for
example. If the CPU instead reports a partial update, warn and taint the
kernel at least.
A partial update may still update the revision. Continue checking the
revision rather than an immediate error return so the update result
remains consistent with the revision changes.
Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
---
V1 -> V2: Do not raise panic, inline cpuid check and massage the changelog (Dave)
---
arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 4 +++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
index 18c4be75e927..7273d340470d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
@@ -977,6 +977,10 @@
#define MSR_IA32_MCU_ENUMERATION 0x0000007b
#define MCU_STAGING BIT(4)
+#define MSR_IA32_MCU_STATUS 0x0000007c
+#define MCU_PARTIAL_UPDATE BIT(0)
+#define AUTH_FAIL_ON_MCU_COMPONENT BIT(1)
+
#define MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV 0x0000008b
/* Intel SGX Launch Enclave Public Key Hash MSRs */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index f4a444e6114d..913b0b32e39b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ static const char ucode_path[] = "kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin";
#define MBOX_XACTION_TIMEOUT_MS (10 * MSEC_PER_SEC)
+#define CPUID_EDX_ARCH_CAP BIT(29)
+#define MCU_STATUS_FAILURE_MASK (MCU_PARTIAL_UPDATE | AUTH_FAIL_ON_MCU_COMPONENT)
+
/* Current microcode patch used in early patching on the APs. */
static struct microcode_intel *ucode_patch_va __read_mostly;
static struct microcode_intel *ucode_patch_late __read_mostly;
@@ -679,6 +682,24 @@ static void stage_microcode(void)
pr_info("Staging of patch revision 0x%x succeeded.\n", ucode_patch_late->hdr.rev);
}
+/*
+ * __apply_microcode() is the only caller which may be invoked in the early
+ * loading path. Use raw CPUID/RDMSR functions.
+ */
+static bool update_status_available(void)
+{
+ if (native_cpuid_eax(0) < 7)
+ return false;
+
+ if (!(native_cpuid_edx(7) & CPUID_EDX_ARCH_CAP))
+ return false;
+
+ if (!(native_rdmsrq(MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES) & ARCH_CAP_MCU_ENUM))
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static enum ucode_state __apply_microcode(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci,
struct microcode_intel *mc,
u32 *cur_rev)
@@ -702,6 +723,22 @@ static enum ucode_state __apply_microcode(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci,
/* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
native_wrmsrq(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits);
+ /*
+ * Warn and taint the kernel on a partial update. Fatal conditions are
+ * expected to be handled by the CPU itself.
+ *
+ * Then, continue checking the revision since a partial update may still
+ * advance the microcode revision.
+ */
+ if (update_status_available()) {
+ u64 status = native_rdmsrq(MSR_IA32_MCU_STATUS);
+
+ if (status & MCU_STATUS_FAILURE_MASK) {
+ pr_warn_once("update incomplete (MSR_IA32_MCU_STATUS=0x%llx).\n", status);
+ add_taint(TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
+ }
+ }
+
rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
if (rev != mc->hdr.rev)
return UCODE_ERROR;
--
2.51.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 19:13 [PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Panic on partial microcode update Chang S. Bae
2026-06-30 21:38 ` Dave Hansen
2026-06-30 21:47 ` Dave Hansen
2026-06-30 23:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-01 19:02 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-07-08 21:18 ` Chang S. Bae [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708211803.402467-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox