mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc slot of xattr and dir index blocks
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 14:28:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831062848.2743436-4-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831062848.2743436-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>

ocfs2_validate_xattr_block() and ocfs2_validate_dx_root() do not
validate xb_suballoc_slot and dr_suballoc_slot against the mounted
filesystem's slot range.  Since xattr blocks and dir index root blocks
are allocated from a per-slot suballocator at runtime, their suballoc
slots must be within range.

Otherwise a corrupted image can carry an out-of-range slot.  When the
xattr block or dir index is removed, ocfs2_xattr_block_remove() or
ocfs2_dx_dir_remove_index() passes the unvalidated slot to
ocfs2_get_system_file_inode() and get_local_system_inode() will either
hit BUG_ON(slot == OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT) or compute an out-of-bounds
index into the local_system_inodes array.

Reject out-of-range suballoc slots during validation.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 fs/ocfs2/dir.c   | 14 ++++++++++++++
 fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
index 0075e1624310..eb9850610ba3 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
@@ -605,6 +605,20 @@ static int ocfs2_validate_dx_root(struct super_block *sb,
 		goto bail;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Dir index root blocks are allocated from a per-slot suballocator,
+	 * so the slot must be in range.  Otherwise removing the index passes
+	 * it to get_local_system_inode(), which hits BUG_ON() for
+	 * OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT or computes an out-of-bounds index otherwise.
+	 */
+	if ((u32)le16_to_cpu(dx_root->dr_suballoc_slot) >= OCFS2_SB(sb)->max_slots) {
+		ret = ocfs2_error(sb,
+				  "Dir Index Root # %llu has invalid dr_suballoc_slot %u\n",
+				  (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(dx_root->dr_blkno),
+				  le16_to_cpu(dx_root->dr_suballoc_slot));
+		goto bail;
+	}
+
 	if (!(dx_root->dr_flags & OCFS2_DX_FLAG_INLINE)) {
 		struct ocfs2_extent_list *el = &dx_root->dr_list;
 
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
index 0062cbeb1e8b..5acc8091d06f 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
@@ -517,6 +517,19 @@ static int ocfs2_validate_xattr_block(struct super_block *sb,
 				   le32_to_cpu(xb->xb_fs_generation));
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Xattr blocks are allocated from a per-slot suballocator, so the
+	 * slot must be in range.  Otherwise freeing the block passes it to
+	 * get_local_system_inode(), which hits BUG_ON() for
+	 * OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT or computes an out-of-bounds index otherwise.
+	 */
+	if ((u32)le16_to_cpu(xb->xb_suballoc_slot) >= OCFS2_SB(sb)->max_slots) {
+		return ocfs2_error(sb,
+				   "Extended attribute block #%llu has an invalid xb_suballoc_slot of %u\n",
+				   (unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr,
+				   le16_to_cpu(xb->xb_suballoc_slot));
+	}
+
 	if (!(le16_to_cpu(xb->xb_flags) & OCFS2_XATTR_INDEXED)) {
 		size_t region_offset =
 			offsetof(struct ocfs2_xattr_block, xb_attrs.xb_header);
-- 
2.39.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-31  6:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-31  6:28 [PATCH 0/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc slot and bit of metadata blocks Joseph Qi
2026-08-31  6:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] ocfs2: restrict OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT suballoc slot to system inodes Joseph Qi
2026-08-31 14:02   ` Heming Zhao
2026-09-01  1:08     ` Joseph Qi
2026-09-01  1:16       ` Heming Zhao
2026-09-01  2:08         ` Joseph Qi
2026-08-31  6:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc bit during inode read Joseph Qi
2026-08-31 14:03   ` Heming Zhao
2026-08-31  6:28 ` Joseph Qi [this message]
2026-08-31 14:04   ` [PATCH 3/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc slot of xattr and dir index blocks Heming Zhao
2026-08-31  6:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc slot of extent blocks Joseph Qi
2026-08-31 14:04   ` Heming Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260831062848.2743436-4-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark@fasheh.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®