mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ocfs2: restrict OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT suballoc slot to system inodes
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 09:08:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdd373d2-0c70-4a64-b2da-50f2dac194b1@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <apWJLyCNwqfdiRQb@p15>



On 8/31/26 10:02 PM, Heming Zhao wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 02:28:45PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
>> ocfs2_validate_inode_block() currently permits i_suballoc_slot to be
>> OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT for any dinode.  Only system inodes created by
>> mkfs.ocfs2 are allocated from the global allocator and thus
>> legitimately carry this value; regular inodes are always allocated
>> from a per-slot suballocator and hence must have a valid slot.
>>
>> If a corrupted regular inode with OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT is accepted,
>> ocfs2_remove_inode() will pass the slot to ocfs2_get_system_file_inode()
>> and get_local_system_inode() will hit BUG_ON(slot == OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT)
>> when the inode is deleted.  This can be triggered by an unprivileged
>> user unlinking such a corrupted file.
>>
>> Reject OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT for non-system dinodes during validation,
>> while still accepting it for system inodes.
>>
>> Fixes: fe7a283b3916 ("ocfs2: add suballoc slot check in ocfs2_validate_inode_block()")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> LGTM.
> Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>

Thanks, sashiko has some review comments, I'll fix them and send v2 later.

Joseph

>> ---
>>  fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
>> index 180107a11046..eda50f13ffb5 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
>> @@ -1520,8 +1520,23 @@ int ocfs2_validate_inode_block(struct super_block *sb,
>>  		goto bail;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	if (le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_slot) != (u16)OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT &&
>> -	    (u32)le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_slot) > OCFS2_SB(sb)->max_slots - 1) {
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Only system inodes created by mkfs.ocfs2 are allocated from the
>> +	 * global allocator and thus legitimately carry OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT.
>> +	 * Regular inodes are always allocated from a per-slot suballocator.
>> +	 * If a regular inode with OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT was accepted here,
>> +	 * deleting it would pass the slot to get_local_system_inode() via
>> +	 * ocfs2_remove_inode() and trigger BUG_ON(slot == OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT).
>> +	 */
>> +	if (le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_slot) == (u16)OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT) {
>> +		if (!(le32_to_cpu(di->i_flags) & OCFS2_SYSTEM_FL)) {
>> +			rc = ocfs2_error(sb,
>> +					 "Invalid dinode %llu: suballoc slot %u for non-system inode\n",
>> +					 (unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr,
>> +					 le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_slot));
>> +			goto bail;
>> +		}
>> +	} else if ((u32)le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_slot) > OCFS2_SB(sb)->max_slots - 1) {
>>  		rc = ocfs2_error(sb, "Invalid dinode %llu: suballoc slot %u\n",
>>  				 (unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr,
>>  				 le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_slot));
>> -- 
>> 2.39.3
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-01  1:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-31  6:28 [PATCH 0/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc slot and bit of metadata blocks Joseph Qi
2026-08-31  6:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] ocfs2: restrict OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT suballoc slot to system inodes Joseph Qi
2026-08-31 14:02   ` Heming Zhao
2026-09-01  1:08     ` Joseph Qi [this message]
2026-09-01  1:16       ` Heming Zhao
2026-09-01  2:08         ` Joseph Qi
2026-08-31  6:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc bit during inode read Joseph Qi
2026-08-31 14:03   ` Heming Zhao
2026-08-31  6:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc slot of xattr and dir index blocks Joseph Qi
2026-08-31 14:04   ` Heming Zhao
2026-08-31  6:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc slot of extent blocks Joseph Qi
2026-08-31 14:04   ` Heming Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fdd373d2-0c70-4a64-b2da-50f2dac194b1@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark@fasheh.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®