From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
To: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc slot of xattr and dir index blocks
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 22:04:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apWJxbUk2gk5Kq9o@p15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831062848.2743436-4-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 02:28:47PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
> ocfs2_validate_xattr_block() and ocfs2_validate_dx_root() do not
> validate xb_suballoc_slot and dr_suballoc_slot against the mounted
> filesystem's slot range. Since xattr blocks and dir index root blocks
> are allocated from a per-slot suballocator at runtime, their suballoc
> slots must be within range.
>
> Otherwise a corrupted image can carry an out-of-range slot. When the
> xattr block or dir index is removed, ocfs2_xattr_block_remove() or
> ocfs2_dx_dir_remove_index() passes the unvalidated slot to
> ocfs2_get_system_file_inode() and get_local_system_inode() will either
> hit BUG_ON(slot == OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT) or compute an out-of-bounds
> index into the local_system_inodes array.
>
> Reject out-of-range suballoc slots during validation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
LGTM, thanks for the contribution.
Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> index 0075e1624310..eb9850610ba3 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> @@ -605,6 +605,20 @@ static int ocfs2_validate_dx_root(struct super_block *sb,
> goto bail;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Dir index root blocks are allocated from a per-slot suballocator,
> + * so the slot must be in range. Otherwise removing the index passes
> + * it to get_local_system_inode(), which hits BUG_ON() for
> + * OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT or computes an out-of-bounds index otherwise.
> + */
> + if ((u32)le16_to_cpu(dx_root->dr_suballoc_slot) >= OCFS2_SB(sb)->max_slots) {
> + ret = ocfs2_error(sb,
> + "Dir Index Root # %llu has invalid dr_suballoc_slot %u\n",
> + (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(dx_root->dr_blkno),
> + le16_to_cpu(dx_root->dr_suballoc_slot));
> + goto bail;
> + }
> +
> if (!(dx_root->dr_flags & OCFS2_DX_FLAG_INLINE)) {
> struct ocfs2_extent_list *el = &dx_root->dr_list;
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> index 0062cbeb1e8b..5acc8091d06f 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> @@ -517,6 +517,19 @@ static int ocfs2_validate_xattr_block(struct super_block *sb,
> le32_to_cpu(xb->xb_fs_generation));
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Xattr blocks are allocated from a per-slot suballocator, so the
> + * slot must be in range. Otherwise freeing the block passes it to
> + * get_local_system_inode(), which hits BUG_ON() for
> + * OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT or computes an out-of-bounds index otherwise.
> + */
> + if ((u32)le16_to_cpu(xb->xb_suballoc_slot) >= OCFS2_SB(sb)->max_slots) {
> + return ocfs2_error(sb,
> + "Extended attribute block #%llu has an invalid xb_suballoc_slot of %u\n",
> + (unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr,
> + le16_to_cpu(xb->xb_suballoc_slot));
> + }
> +
> if (!(le16_to_cpu(xb->xb_flags) & OCFS2_XATTR_INDEXED)) {
> size_t region_offset =
> offsetof(struct ocfs2_xattr_block, xb_attrs.xb_header);
> --
> 2.39.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 6:28 [PATCH 0/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc slot and bit of metadata blocks Joseph Qi
2026-08-31 6:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] ocfs2: restrict OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT suballoc slot to system inodes Joseph Qi
2026-08-31 14:02 ` Heming Zhao
2026-09-01 1:08 ` Joseph Qi
2026-09-01 1:16 ` Heming Zhao
2026-09-01 2:08 ` Joseph Qi
2026-08-31 6:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc bit during inode read Joseph Qi
2026-08-31 14:03 ` Heming Zhao
2026-08-31 6:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc slot of xattr and dir index blocks Joseph Qi
2026-08-31 14:04 ` Heming Zhao [this message]
2026-08-31 6:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc slot of extent blocks Joseph Qi
2026-08-31 14:04 ` Heming Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apWJxbUk2gk5Kq9o@p15 \
--to=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®