mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
To: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc slot of xattr and dir index blocks
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 22:04:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <apWJxbUk2gk5Kq9o@p15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831062848.2743436-4-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>

On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 02:28:47PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
> ocfs2_validate_xattr_block() and ocfs2_validate_dx_root() do not
> validate xb_suballoc_slot and dr_suballoc_slot against the mounted
> filesystem's slot range.  Since xattr blocks and dir index root blocks
> are allocated from a per-slot suballocator at runtime, their suballoc
> slots must be within range.
> 
> Otherwise a corrupted image can carry an out-of-range slot.  When the
> xattr block or dir index is removed, ocfs2_xattr_block_remove() or
> ocfs2_dx_dir_remove_index() passes the unvalidated slot to
> ocfs2_get_system_file_inode() and get_local_system_inode() will either
> hit BUG_ON(slot == OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT) or compute an out-of-bounds
> index into the local_system_inodes array.
> 
> Reject out-of-range suballoc slots during validation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>

LGTM, thanks for the contribution.
Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/dir.c   | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> index 0075e1624310..eb9850610ba3 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> @@ -605,6 +605,20 @@ static int ocfs2_validate_dx_root(struct super_block *sb,
>  		goto bail;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Dir index root blocks are allocated from a per-slot suballocator,
> +	 * so the slot must be in range.  Otherwise removing the index passes
> +	 * it to get_local_system_inode(), which hits BUG_ON() for
> +	 * OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT or computes an out-of-bounds index otherwise.
> +	 */
> +	if ((u32)le16_to_cpu(dx_root->dr_suballoc_slot) >= OCFS2_SB(sb)->max_slots) {
> +		ret = ocfs2_error(sb,
> +				  "Dir Index Root # %llu has invalid dr_suballoc_slot %u\n",
> +				  (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(dx_root->dr_blkno),
> +				  le16_to_cpu(dx_root->dr_suballoc_slot));
> +		goto bail;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!(dx_root->dr_flags & OCFS2_DX_FLAG_INLINE)) {
>  		struct ocfs2_extent_list *el = &dx_root->dr_list;
>  
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> index 0062cbeb1e8b..5acc8091d06f 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> @@ -517,6 +517,19 @@ static int ocfs2_validate_xattr_block(struct super_block *sb,
>  				   le32_to_cpu(xb->xb_fs_generation));
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Xattr blocks are allocated from a per-slot suballocator, so the
> +	 * slot must be in range.  Otherwise freeing the block passes it to
> +	 * get_local_system_inode(), which hits BUG_ON() for
> +	 * OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT or computes an out-of-bounds index otherwise.
> +	 */
> +	if ((u32)le16_to_cpu(xb->xb_suballoc_slot) >= OCFS2_SB(sb)->max_slots) {
> +		return ocfs2_error(sb,
> +				   "Extended attribute block #%llu has an invalid xb_suballoc_slot of %u\n",
> +				   (unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr,
> +				   le16_to_cpu(xb->xb_suballoc_slot));
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!(le16_to_cpu(xb->xb_flags) & OCFS2_XATTR_INDEXED)) {
>  		size_t region_offset =
>  			offsetof(struct ocfs2_xattr_block, xb_attrs.xb_header);
> -- 
> 2.39.3
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-31 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-31  6:28 [PATCH 0/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc slot and bit of metadata blocks Joseph Qi
2026-08-31  6:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] ocfs2: restrict OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT suballoc slot to system inodes Joseph Qi
2026-08-31 14:02   ` Heming Zhao
2026-09-01  1:08     ` Joseph Qi
2026-09-01  1:16       ` Heming Zhao
2026-09-01  2:08         ` Joseph Qi
2026-08-31  6:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc bit during inode read Joseph Qi
2026-08-31 14:03   ` Heming Zhao
2026-08-31  6:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc slot of xattr and dir index blocks Joseph Qi
2026-08-31 14:04   ` Heming Zhao [this message]
2026-08-31  6:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc slot of extent blocks Joseph Qi
2026-08-31 14:04   ` Heming Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=apWJxbUk2gk5Kq9o@p15 \
    --to=heming.zhao@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark@fasheh.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®