From: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 8/8] selftests: vDSO: vdso_test_correctness: Use system call wrappers from vdso_syscalls.h
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 09:38:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903-vdso-test-types-v2-8-1eec04eb3658@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903-vdso-test-types-v2-0-1eec04eb3658@linutronix.de>
Using syscall() is problematic for the reasons outlined in vdso_syscalls.h.
Use the wrappers from the utility header instead.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
---
.../testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_correctness.c | 44 +++++-----------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_correctness.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_correctness.c
index 83cb408c5947..76133566d747 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_correctness.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_correctness.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include "parse_vdso.h"
#include "vdso_config.h"
#include "vdso_call.h"
+#include "vdso_syscalls.h"
#include "vdso_types.h"
#include "kselftest.h"
@@ -131,31 +132,6 @@ static long sys_getcpu(unsigned * cpu, unsigned * node,
return syscall(__NR_getcpu, cpu, node, cache);
}
-static inline int sys_clock_gettime(clockid_t id, struct timespec *ts)
-{
- return syscall(__NR_clock_gettime, id, ts);
-}
-
-static inline int sys_clock_gettime64(clockid_t id, struct __kernel_timespec *ts)
-{
- return syscall(__NR_clock_gettime64, id, ts);
-}
-
-static inline int sys_gettimeofday(struct timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz)
-{
- return syscall(__NR_gettimeofday, tv, tz);
-}
-
-static inline __kernel_old_time_t sys_time(__kernel_old_time_t *tloc)
-{
-#ifdef __NR_time
- return syscall(__NR_time, tloc);
-#else
- errno = ENOSYS;
- return -1;
-#endif
-}
-
static void test_getcpu(void)
{
printf("[RUN]\tTesting getcpu...\n");
@@ -247,8 +223,8 @@ static char const * const clocknames[] = {
static void test_one_clock_gettime(int clock, const char *name)
{
+ struct __kernel_timespec start, end;
struct __kernel_old_timespec vdso;
- struct timespec start, end;
int vdso_ret, end_ret;
printf("[RUN]\tTesting clock_gettime for clock %s (%d)...\n", name, clock);
@@ -279,9 +255,9 @@ static void test_one_clock_gettime(int clock, const char *name)
}
printf("\t%llu.%09ld %llu.%09ld %llu.%09ld\n",
- (unsigned long long)start.tv_sec, start.tv_nsec,
- (unsigned long long)vdso.tv_sec, vdso.tv_nsec,
- (unsigned long long)end.tv_sec, end.tv_nsec);
+ (unsigned long long)start.tv_sec, (unsigned long)start.tv_nsec,
+ (unsigned long long)vdso.tv_sec, (unsigned long)vdso.tv_nsec,
+ (unsigned long long)end.tv_sec, (unsigned long)end.tv_nsec);
if (!ts_leq(&start, &vdso) || !ts_leq(&vdso, &end)) {
printf("[FAIL]\tTimes are out of sequence\n");
@@ -315,7 +291,7 @@ static void test_one_clock_gettime64(int clock, const char *name)
printf("[RUN]\tTesting clock_gettime64 for clock %s (%d)...\n", name, clock);
- if (sys_clock_gettime64(clock, &start) < 0) {
+ if (sys_clock_gettime(clock, &start) < 0) {
if (errno == EINVAL) {
vdso_ret = VDSO_CALL(vdso_clock_gettime64, 2, clock, &vdso);
if (vdso_ret == -EINVAL) {
@@ -331,7 +307,7 @@ static void test_one_clock_gettime64(int clock, const char *name)
}
vdso_ret = VDSO_CALL(vdso_clock_gettime64, 2, clock, &vdso);
- end_ret = sys_clock_gettime64(clock, &end);
+ end_ret = sys_clock_gettime(clock, &end);
if (vdso_ret != 0 || end_ret != 0) {
printf("[FAIL]\tvDSO returned %d, syscall errno=%d\n",
@@ -372,10 +348,8 @@ static void test_clock_gettime64(void)
static void test_gettimeofday(void)
{
- struct __kernel_old_timeval vdso;
- struct kernel_timezone vdso_tz;
- struct timeval start, end;
- struct timezone sys_tz;
+ struct __kernel_old_timeval start, vdso, end;
+ struct kernel_timezone vdso_tz, sys_tz;
int vdso_ret, end_ret;
if (!vdso_gettimeofday)
--
2.55.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 7:38 [PATCH v2 0/8] selftests: vDSO: Stop using libc types for vDSO calls Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-03 7:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] selftests: vDSO: Introduce vdso_types.h Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-03 7:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] selftests: vDSO: Introduce vdso_syscalls.h Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-03 7:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] selftests: vDSO: vdso_test_abi: Use types from vdso_types.h Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-03 7:38 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] selftests: vDSO: vdso_test_abi: Use system call wrappers from vdso_syscalls.h Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-03 7:38 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] selftests: vDSO: vdso_test_gettimeofday: Use types from vdso_types.h Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-03 7:38 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] selftests: vDSO: vdso_test_correctness: Make ts_leq() and tv_leq() more generic Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-03 7:38 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] selftests: vDSO: vdso_test_correctness: Use types from vdso_types.h Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-03 7:38 ` Thomas Weißschuh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260903-vdso-test-types-v2-8-1eec04eb3658@linutronix.de \
--to=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®