From: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, connoro@google.com, jstultz@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arighi@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/numa: Drive NUMA task tick from execution context
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 21:10:21 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260908121021.53837-1-sh_def@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908104407.GD687043@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 12:44:07PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> I also wondered if we should have task_tick() do curr_class->task_tick()
> last, rather than first. But I couldn't immediately find a compelling
> argument either way around.
>
> Updated...
>
> @@ -910,6 +910,16 @@ static void __used hrtick_clear(struct rq *rq)
> hrtimer_cancel(&rq->hrtick_timer);
> }
>
> +static inline void task_tick(struct rq *rq, int queued)
> +{
> + const struct sched_class *curr_class = rq->curr->sched_class,
> + *donor_class = rq->donor->sched_class;
> +
> + curr_class->task_tick(rq, queued);
> + if (sched_proxy_exec() && donor_class != curr_class)
> + donor_class->task_tick(rq, queued);
> +}
The per-class split looks good to me. I noticed a couple of details while
going through the updated version.
First, I think there is a reason to call curr_class->task_tick() last.
For example, with an RT/DL donor and a FAIR execution context, the donor
class tick calls update_curr_*(), which goes through
update_curr_common()/update_se() and accounts the elapsed task runtime
to rq->curr->se.sum_exec_runtime. If the FAIR callback runs first,
task_tick_numa() observes sum_exec_runtime before the current tick's runtime
has been accounted.
Calling the donor class first preserves the accounting-before-consumer
ordering:
donor_class->task_tick(rq, queued);
if (sched_proxy_exec() && curr_class != donor_class)
curr_class->task_tick(rq, queued);
This also matches the ordering in v3, where the donor tick ran before
sched_tick_exec_ctx().
Second, task_tick() is added after hrtick_clear(), which puts it inside
CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK. Since sched_tick() calls task_tick() unconditionally,
CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK=n would leave task_tick() undefined. The helper needs
to be outside the CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK block.
With those changes, the split and the queued handling look good to me so far.
I'll test the cross-class and hrtick cases, rework the series accordingly,
and send a v4.
Thanks,
Hui
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 8:52 [PATCH v3 0/2] sched: Fix execution-context tick handling under proxy execution Hui Su
2026-09-04 8:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/numa: Drive NUMA task tick from execution context Hui Su
2026-09-04 15:52 ` Chen Yu
2026-09-04 17:17 ` Tim Chen
2026-09-08 7:40 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-09-08 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-08 10:02 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-09-08 10:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-08 12:10 ` Hui Su [this message]
2026-09-09 8:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-04 8:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] sched/cache: Drive cache " Hui Su
2026-09-08 7:45 ` Chen, Yu C
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260908121021.53837-1-sh_def@163.com \
--to=sh_def@163.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=connoro@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®