Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/numa: Drive NUMA task tick from execution context

[Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>]

On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 04:52:43PM +0800, Hui Su wrote:
> Proxy execution separates the scheduling context in rq->donor from the
> execution context in rq->curr. sched_tick() invokes task_tick() for the
> donor's scheduling class.
> 
> task_tick_numa() operates on state associated with the task actually
> executing, including its mm and NUMA work state. With proxy execution,
> rq->donor provides the scheduling context while rq->curr identifies the
> execution context.
> 
> Task-level execution runtime is likewise accounted to rq->curr, and
> task_tick_numa() uses that runtime to drive periodic NUMA scanning.
> Keeping task_tick_numa() under task_tick_fair() also means that it is not
> invoked when a fair task executes on behalf of an RT or deadline donor.
> 
> Move NUMA tick handling into a scheduler helper for the execution
> context, and invoke it from both sched_tick() and sched_tick_remote().
> 

Both patches look good to me, let me launch a test and verify it works
as expected and report back later.

thanks,
Chenyu