mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
To: 胡连勤 <hulianqin@vivo.com>
Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
	Selvarasu Ganesan <selvarasu.g@samsung.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"quic_wcheng@quicinc.com" <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>,
	"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"cpgs@samsung.com" <cpgs@samsung.com>,
	"alim.akhtar@samsung.com" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"thiagu.r@samsung.com" <thiagu.r@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xhci: sideband: check vdev liveness before removing endpoints on unregister
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 11:09:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260914110949.38a46596.michal.pecio@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TYUPR06MB62174110FB101AD6B7B069EBD2BB2@TYUPR06MB6217.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>

On Mon, 14 Sep 2026 07:04:17 +0000, 胡连勤 wrote:
> > It doesn't cover hub_port_reset() called by port_event() for
> > SuperSpeed devices, not sure what that is and whether it's
> > dangerous. I noted that the original patch talks about hub_event(),
> > but maybe it's a mistake? 
> 
> Thanks for the analysis. A clarification on the hub_event() reference
> in my patch:
> 
> The crash trace shows hub_event() at the top because that's the actual
> crash call stack from the failing device. The full sequence is:
> 
>   hub_event()
>     -> port_event()                           [hub.c:5966]
>        -> usb_reset_device(udev)              [hub.c:5875]
>           -> usb_reset_and_verify_device()    [hub.c:6183]
>              -> hub_port_init()               [hub.c:6228]
>                 -> hcd->driver->address_device()  [hub.c:4781]
>                    -> xhci_setup_device()     <-- COMP_USB_TRANSACTION_ERROR
>                       -> xhci_disable_and_free_slot()  [xhci.c:4438]
>                          -> xhci_free_virt_device()   <-- frees vdev here  

So not a mistake and this is indeed a dangerous case. And AFAICT, in
this path udev's pre_reset() routine isn't called and therefore can't
be used to fix your issue, unless USB core is patched to call it.

But xhci_discover_or_reset_device() is called: before hub_port_init()
calls problematic hub_enable_device() / hub_address_device() functions,
it calls hub_port_reset(), which calls hcd->driver->reset_device().

But I'm not entirely sure what happens if reset fails before this call
is made and then hub_port_init() jumps to re_enumerate. The function
bails out, but sooner or later somebody will try to free this device in
some manner, I suppose, so what happens then?

Regards,
Michal

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-14  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-07 12:24 胡连勤
2026-09-10  9:34 ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-10 11:10   ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2026-09-10 12:11     ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-10 13:50       ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-11  5:10       ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2026-09-11  7:29         ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-11  8:41           ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2026-09-11 13:10             ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-11 14:49               ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-12 12:18               ` Michal Pecio
2026-09-14  7:04                 ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-14  9:09                   ` Michal Pecio [this message]
2026-09-14 12:24                     ` 胡连勤
2026-09-14 13:09                       ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-14 14:06                         ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-14 15:34                           ` Michal Pecio
2026-09-14 12:26                     ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-14 13:00                       ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-14 13:40                         ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-14 13:46                         ` Michal Pecio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260914110949.38a46596.michal.pecio@gmail.com \
    --to=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cpgs@samsung.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hulianqin@vivo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=quic_wcheng@quicinc.com \
    --cc=selvarasu.g@samsung.com \
    --cc=thiagu.r@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®