mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: 胡连勤 <hulianqin@vivo.com>, "Michal Pecio" <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
Cc: Selvarasu Ganesan <selvarasu.g@samsung.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"quic_wcheng@quicinc.com" <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>,
	"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"cpgs@samsung.com" <cpgs@samsung.com>,
	"alim.akhtar@samsung.com" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"thiagu.r@samsung.com" <thiagu.r@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: 答复: [PATCH] xhci: sideband: check vdev liveness before removing endpoints on unregister
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 16:40:18 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e2c9b03-4694-4f6b-8fc0-552c069de65f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TYUPR06MB621791B56D232A2219614493D2BB2@TYUPR06MB6217.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>

On 9/14/26 16:00, 胡连勤 wrote:
> Hi Mathias,
> 
>>>
>>> But xhci_discover_or_reset_device() is called: before hub_port_init()
>>> calls problematic hub_enable_device() / hub_address_device() functions,
>>> it calls hub_port_reset(), which calls hcd->driver->reset_device().
>>
>> To me it looks like both drv->pre_reset and xhci_discover_or_reset_device()
>> are called in this path.
>>
> Your code tracing is correct. drv->pre_reset() IS called at
> hub.c:6412 before usb_reset_and_verify_device(), and
> xhci_discover_or_reset_device() IS called via hub_port_reset() →
> hcd->driver->reset_device() inside hub_port_init().
> 
> However, this path is not the actual crash path. I apologize —
> my earlier call chain referencing usb_reset_device() was an
> assumption, not from the actual crash dump.
> 
> 
>> hub_event()
>>     port_event()
>>       usb_reset_device(udev)
>>         if (config) //and for each interface in this config: , for each interface)
>>           if (cintf->dev.driver) {
>>             drv = to_usb_driver(cintf->dev.driver);
>>             if (drv->pre_reset && drv->post_reset)
>>             unbind = (drv->pre_reset)(cintf);
>>
>>
>> Any chance you could trace the whole call path in more details and see exactly which path
>> is staken before the crash.
>>
>> port_event() should only call usb_reset_device() for usb3 devices with link stuck in
>> ss.inactive for longer than ~100ms.  Is this really a usb3 audio device?
>>
> No, it is not. The device is a full-speed Apple EarPods
> (USB 1.1):
> 
>    usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 2 using xhci-hcd
>    usb 1-1: Product: EarPods
>    usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=05ac, idProduct=110b
> 
> So the port_event() → usb_reset_device() warm-reset path for
> SS.Inactive does not apply here.
> The actual crash path is through usb_disconnect(), not
> usb_reset_device(). The full sequence from dmesg + crash trace:

Thanks for clarifying, the crash part is now clear.

What is still unclear is the parts before this.
How do we end up in a situation where we are resetting and addressing
a device with sideband still registered.

What codepath ends up calling the futile

hub_port_init()
   ->hub_address_device()

that ends up freeing and reallocating the xhci vdev?

Is there a way (like drv->pre_reset call) among that path to
inform audio driver to unregister sideband?

Thanks
Mathias



  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-14 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-07 12:24 胡连勤
2026-09-10  9:34 ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-10 11:10   ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2026-09-10 12:11     ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-10 13:50       ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-11  5:10       ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2026-09-11  7:29         ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-11  8:41           ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2026-09-11 13:10             ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-11 14:49               ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-12 12:18               ` Michal Pecio
2026-09-14  7:04                 ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-14  9:09                   ` Michal Pecio
2026-09-14 12:24                     ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-14 13:09                       ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-14 14:06                         ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-14 15:34                           ` Michal Pecio
2026-09-14 12:26                     ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-14 13:00                       ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-14 13:40                         ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2026-09-14 13:46                         ` Michal Pecio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6e2c9b03-4694-4f6b-8fc0-552c069de65f@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cpgs@samsung.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hulianqin@vivo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
    --cc=quic_wcheng@quicinc.com \
    --cc=selvarasu.g@samsung.com \
    --cc=thiagu.r@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®