From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: 胡连勤 <hulianqin@vivo.com>, "Michal Pecio" <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
Cc: Selvarasu Ganesan <selvarasu.g@samsung.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"quic_wcheng@quicinc.com" <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>,
"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"cpgs@samsung.com" <cpgs@samsung.com>,
"alim.akhtar@samsung.com" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
"thiagu.r@samsung.com" <thiagu.r@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: 答复: [PATCH] xhci: sideband: check vdev liveness before removing endpoints on unregister
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 16:40:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e2c9b03-4694-4f6b-8fc0-552c069de65f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TYUPR06MB621791B56D232A2219614493D2BB2@TYUPR06MB6217.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
On 9/14/26 16:00, 胡连勤 wrote:
> Hi Mathias,
>
>>>
>>> But xhci_discover_or_reset_device() is called: before hub_port_init()
>>> calls problematic hub_enable_device() / hub_address_device() functions,
>>> it calls hub_port_reset(), which calls hcd->driver->reset_device().
>>
>> To me it looks like both drv->pre_reset and xhci_discover_or_reset_device()
>> are called in this path.
>>
> Your code tracing is correct. drv->pre_reset() IS called at
> hub.c:6412 before usb_reset_and_verify_device(), and
> xhci_discover_or_reset_device() IS called via hub_port_reset() →
> hcd->driver->reset_device() inside hub_port_init().
>
> However, this path is not the actual crash path. I apologize —
> my earlier call chain referencing usb_reset_device() was an
> assumption, not from the actual crash dump.
>
>
>> hub_event()
>> port_event()
>> usb_reset_device(udev)
>> if (config) //and for each interface in this config: , for each interface)
>> if (cintf->dev.driver) {
>> drv = to_usb_driver(cintf->dev.driver);
>> if (drv->pre_reset && drv->post_reset)
>> unbind = (drv->pre_reset)(cintf);
>>
>>
>> Any chance you could trace the whole call path in more details and see exactly which path
>> is staken before the crash.
>>
>> port_event() should only call usb_reset_device() for usb3 devices with link stuck in
>> ss.inactive for longer than ~100ms. Is this really a usb3 audio device?
>>
> No, it is not. The device is a full-speed Apple EarPods
> (USB 1.1):
>
> usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 2 using xhci-hcd
> usb 1-1: Product: EarPods
> usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=05ac, idProduct=110b
>
> So the port_event() → usb_reset_device() warm-reset path for
> SS.Inactive does not apply here.
> The actual crash path is through usb_disconnect(), not
> usb_reset_device(). The full sequence from dmesg + crash trace:
Thanks for clarifying, the crash part is now clear.
What is still unclear is the parts before this.
How do we end up in a situation where we are resetting and addressing
a device with sideband still registered.
What codepath ends up calling the futile
hub_port_init()
->hub_address_device()
that ends up freeing and reallocating the xhci vdev?
Is there a way (like drv->pre_reset call) among that path to
inform audio driver to unregister sideband?
Thanks
Mathias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 12:24 胡连勤
2026-09-10 9:34 ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-10 11:10 ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2026-09-10 12:11 ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-10 13:50 ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-11 5:10 ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2026-09-11 7:29 ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-11 8:41 ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2026-09-11 13:10 ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-11 14:49 ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-12 12:18 ` Michal Pecio
2026-09-14 7:04 ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-14 9:09 ` Michal Pecio
2026-09-14 12:24 ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-14 13:09 ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-14 14:06 ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-14 15:34 ` Michal Pecio
2026-09-14 12:26 ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-14 13:00 ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-14 13:40 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2026-09-14 13:46 ` Michal Pecio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6e2c9b03-4694-4f6b-8fc0-552c069de65f@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cpgs@samsung.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hulianqin@vivo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--cc=quic_wcheng@quicinc.com \
--cc=selvarasu.g@samsung.com \
--cc=thiagu.r@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®