From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: "Michal Pecio" <michal.pecio@gmail.com>, 胡连勤 <hulianqin@vivo.com>
Cc: Selvarasu Ganesan <selvarasu.g@samsung.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"quic_wcheng@quicinc.com" <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>,
"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"cpgs@samsung.com" <cpgs@samsung.com>,
"alim.akhtar@samsung.com" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
"thiagu.r@samsung.com" <thiagu.r@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xhci: sideband: check vdev liveness before removing endpoints on unregister
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 15:26:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <852003c6-317c-4004-ba2c-d6c4b0bd31e6@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914110949.38a46596.michal.pecio@gmail.com>
On 9/14/26 12:09, Michal Pecio wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2026 07:04:17 +0000, 胡连勤 wrote:
>>> It doesn't cover hub_port_reset() called by port_event() for
>>> SuperSpeed devices, not sure what that is and whether it's
>>> dangerous. I noted that the original patch talks about hub_event(),
>>> but maybe it's a mistake?
>>
>> Thanks for the analysis. A clarification on the hub_event() reference
>> in my patch:
>>
>> The crash trace shows hub_event() at the top because that's the actual
>> crash call stack from the failing device. The full sequence is:
>>
>> hub_event()
>> -> port_event() [hub.c:5966]
>> -> usb_reset_device(udev) [hub.c:5875]
>> -> usb_reset_and_verify_device() [hub.c:6183]
>> -> hub_port_init() [hub.c:6228]
>> -> hcd->driver->address_device() [hub.c:4781]
>> -> xhci_setup_device() <-- COMP_USB_TRANSACTION_ERROR
>> -> xhci_disable_and_free_slot() [xhci.c:4438]
>> -> xhci_free_virt_device() <-- frees vdev here
>
> So not a mistake and this is indeed a dangerous case. And AFAICT, in
> this path udev's pre_reset() routine isn't called and therefore can't
> be used to fix your issue, unless USB core is patched to call it.
>
> But xhci_discover_or_reset_device() is called: before hub_port_init()
> calls problematic hub_enable_device() / hub_address_device() functions,
> it calls hub_port_reset(), which calls hcd->driver->reset_device().
To me it looks like both drv->pre_reset and xhci_discover_or_reset_device()
are called in this path.
hub_event()
port_event()
usb_reset_device(udev)
if (config) //and for each interface in this config: , for each interface)
if (cintf->dev.driver) {
drv = to_usb_driver(cintf->dev.driver);
if (drv->pre_reset && drv->post_reset)
unbind = (drv->pre_reset)(cintf);
Any chance you could trace the whole call path in more details and see exactly which path
is staken before the crash.
port_event() should only call usb_reset_device() for usb3 devices with link stuck in
ss.inactive for longer than ~100ms. Is this really a usb3 audio device?
Thanks
Mathias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 12:24 胡连勤
2026-09-10 9:34 ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-10 11:10 ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2026-09-10 12:11 ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-10 13:50 ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-11 5:10 ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2026-09-11 7:29 ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-11 8:41 ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2026-09-11 13:10 ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-11 14:49 ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-12 12:18 ` Michal Pecio
2026-09-14 7:04 ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-14 9:09 ` Michal Pecio
2026-09-14 12:24 ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-14 13:09 ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-14 14:06 ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-14 15:34 ` Michal Pecio
2026-09-14 12:26 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2026-09-14 13:00 ` 答复: " 胡连勤
2026-09-14 13:40 ` Mathias Nyman
2026-09-14 13:46 ` Michal Pecio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=852003c6-317c-4004-ba2c-d6c4b0bd31e6@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cpgs@samsung.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hulianqin@vivo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--cc=quic_wcheng@quicinc.com \
--cc=selvarasu.g@samsung.com \
--cc=thiagu.r@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®