From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>,
Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Joerg Roedel (AMD)" <joro@8bytes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
Tushar Dave <tdave@nvidia.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 17/18] dma-buf: Let importers ask how peer-to-peer traffic is routed
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 09:23:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260915062347.GB13683@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3fb7ea0-019f-4311-bf0f-00d25bdebda0@amd.com>
On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 04:27:00PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> On 9/14/26 13:22, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> >
> > Exporters keep the &struct p2pdma_provider backing a buffer in their own
> > private data. An importer cannot reach it, so it has no way to learn how
> > its own peer-to-peer traffic would be routed before it programs its
> > hardware.
> >
> > Add an optional @p2pdma_provider callback for an exporter to hand that
> > provider out, and dma_buf_p2pdma_map_type() for an importer to ask by TLP
> > class. Exporters keep the provider where it already lives, so this adds an
> > operation rather than changing any existing signature or structure.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-mapping.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_std_types_dmabuf.c | 12 +++++++++
> > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c | 12 +++++++++
> > include/linux/dma-buf-mapping.h | 3 +++
> > include/linux/dma-buf.h | 17 ++++++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 76 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-mapping.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-mapping.c
> > index 794acff2546a..fb03a698b381 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-mapping.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-mapping.c
> > @@ -6,6 +6,38 @@
> > #include <linux/dma-buf-mapping.h>
> > #include <linux/dma-resv.h>
> >
> > +/**
> > + * dma_buf_p2pdma_map_type - How peer-to-peer traffic to a buffer is routed
> > + * @attach: attachment of the importer that will issue the traffic
> > + * @tlp_flags: &enum pci_p2pdma_tlp_flags describing the TLPs it will issue
> > + *
> > + * Reports how the PCIe fabric routes @tlp_flags traffic between the buffer
> > + * behind @attach and the importer attached to it, so that an importer can
> > + * choose the TLP attributes that earn it a direct route before it programs
> > + * its hardware.
> > + *
> > + * Return: the mapping type for @tlp_flags traffic, or PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_NONE
> > + * when the exporter names no &struct p2pdma_provider and nothing is known
> > + * about the route.
> > + */
> > +enum pci_p2pdma_map_type
> > +dma_buf_p2pdma_map_type(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
> > + unsigned int tlp_flags)
> > +{
> > + struct dma_buf *dmabuf = attach->dmabuf;
> > + struct p2pdma_provider *provider;
> > +
> > + if (!dmabuf->ops->p2pdma_provider)
> > + return PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_NONE;
> > +
> > + provider = dmabuf->ops->p2pdma_provider(dmabuf);
> > + if (!provider)
> > + return PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_NONE;
> > +
> > + return pci_p2pdma_map_type_tlp(provider, attach->dev, tlp_flags);
>
> Calling PCI subsystem functions from dma-buf is a hard NO-GO.
There are two main reasons for this design:
1. DMA-buf's broken use of scatter-gather lists.
2. Hellwig's NAK on exporting low-level PCI P2P functions. These should be
used by core code, while in-kernel exporters and importers may be built
as modules and therefore need EXPORT_SYMBOL() to access PCI P2P
functionality.
>
> Then wrappers for DMA-buf backend functions should be in dma-buf.c and not here.
>
> I shouldn't have allowed the mapping functions to be added to DMA-buf in the first place, all of this belongs either into the DMA layer or the exporter.
Due to item #2, they cannot be in the exporters. Ideally, the DMA layer
should not have PCI-specific paths.
>
> We should probably have a single callback the exporter provides to fill in a structure with PCI specific information for a mapping.
If you have an idea how to do this without adding EXPORT_SYMBOL to p2p,
let me know and I will implement it.
DMA-buf is the de facto mechanism for setting up and using p2p between
devices. There is no other mechanism (except NVMe which is unique)
in the kernel to achieve this. IMHO, the dmabuf code should try to implement
as much of the common functionality as possible, so that dmabuf consumers
do not have to reinvent their own p2p implementations.
>
<...>
> > +
> > static const struct dma_buf_ops vfio_pci_dmabuf_ops = {
> > .attach = vfio_pci_dma_buf_attach,
> > .map_dma_buf = vfio_pci_dma_buf_map,
> > .unmap_dma_buf = vfio_pci_dma_buf_unmap,
> > .release = vfio_pci_dma_buf_release,
> > + .p2pdma_provider = vfio_pci_dma_buf_provider,
>
> Please split up the patch into the actual DMA-buf changes, exporter changes and importer changes.
Sure, will do.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-15 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 11:22 [PATCH v6 00/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route peer-to-peer DMA by TLP class Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v6 01/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Document pdev->p2pdma lifetime rules Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v6 02/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Document the TLP attribute assumptions Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v6 03/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Derive routing from directional ACS controls Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v6 04/18] PCI: Reject unreadable ACS controls in isolation checks Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v6 05/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Evaluate ACS controls at the path divergence Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v6 06/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Document directional ACS routing Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v6 07/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Collect the path's ACS controls before deciding Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v6 08/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Answer routing per TLP class Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v6 09/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route Relaxed Ordering Completions directly Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v6 10/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Reject Translated Requests blocked by Translation Blocking Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v6 11/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route Translated Requests under Direct Translated P2P Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v6 12/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Log detailed ACS routing diagnostics Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v6 13/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Add KUnit tests for the ACS routing decisions Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v6 14/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Test the ACS P2P routing walk Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v6 15/18] PCI: Add KUnit coverage for ACS isolation checks Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v6 16/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Document TLP-class routing Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v6 17/18] dma-buf: Let importers ask how peer-to-peer traffic is routed Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-14 14:27 ` Christian König
2026-09-14 22:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-15 6:28 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-15 6:23 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2026-09-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v6 18/18] RDMA/mlx5: Ask P2PDMA whether ATS takes a direct peer-to-peer route Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260915062347.GB13683@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tdave@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®