From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>,
Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
Ricardo Neri-Calderon <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Lu Wang <wanglu.priv@gmail.com>,
Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>,
Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>,
Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>,
Yi Lai <yi1.lai@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:30:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260916123046.GE776954@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82736e1329bf8ed195bbbc4990486c87094e6789.1789061845.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 10:46:09AM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> alb_break_llc() decides whether to break LLC preference during active
> load balance. It does so by testing that every runnable fair task on the
> source rq prefers its LLC:
>
> env->src_rq->nr_pref_llc_running == env->src_rq->cfs.h_nr_runnable
>
> But the two counters cover different sets. nr_pref_llc_running is updated
> in account_llc_enqueue()/account_llc_dequeue(), next to cfs_rq->nr_queued,
> so it follows queued tasks. h_nr_runnable is updated in set_delayed()/
> clear_delayed() and drops delay-dequeued tasks.
>
> So under DELAY_DEQUEUE, a preferring task that goes to sleep stays counted
> in nr_pref_llc_running while h_nr_runnable falls. The equality then breaks,
> alb_break_llc() returns false, and active balance is free to pull a task
> off its preferred LLC. Active balance only moves runnable tasks, and this
> is the only LLC check it consults: once the stopper runs, LBF_ACTIVE_LB
> skips the per-task test in can_migrate_task(). The runnable set is the one
> we want.
>
> Fix it on the counter side. A task should be counted in
> nr_pref_llc_running exactly while it is both queued on its preferred LLC
> (pref_llc_queued) and runnable (!sched_delayed). Define that membership
> once in task_pref_llc_runnable(), and adjust the counter only through
> pref_llc_running_inc()/pref_llc_running_dec() from the four sites that
> change either input: account_llc_enqueue(), account_llc_dequeue(),
> set_delayed() and clear_delayed(). Gating every update on the same
> predicate keeps the delay, wake and dequeue paths from double-counting
> or underflowing; see the comments at those sites for the ordering.
>
> nr_llc_running and sd->llc_counts are not touched and stay on queued
> semantics.
Needs a fixes tag.
> Reported-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260827135000.735138-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com/
> Suggested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> @@ -6395,6 +6428,14 @@ static __always_inline void return_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
>
> static void set_delayed(struct sched_entity *se)
> {
> + /*
> + * Drop a task leaving the runnable set. Must run before sched_delayed
> + * is set, or task_pref_llc_runnable() would already exclude it;
> + * clear_delayed() mirrors this after clearing the flag.
> + */
> + if (entity_is_task(se))
> + pref_llc_running_dec(rq_of(cfs_rq_of(se)), task_of(se));
> +
> se->sched_delayed = 1;
>
> /*
With flat pick stuff only task can get delayed. Now, I think we merged
the cache aware stuff last cycle, so it we backport this (see that Fixes
thing) then this must stay. But then also please make a note to take out
this condition again later.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 17:46 [PATCH 0/4] sched/cache: Fixes for cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-09-10 17:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain Tim Chen
2026-09-10 18:33 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-10 20:46 ` Tim Chen
2026-09-10 22:03 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-14 2:02 ` Chen Yu
2026-09-14 5:27 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-14 22:25 ` Tim Chen
2026-09-10 22:48 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-16 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-09-16 13:33 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-10 17:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/cache: Honor migrate_llc_task semantics in active load balance Tim Chen
2026-09-10 17:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/cache: Decouple sched_cache_group from mm Tim Chen
2026-09-16 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-10 17:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/cache: Introduce task_struct->sched_cache_grp Tim Chen
2026-09-10 19:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-10 22:50 ` Tim Chen
2026-09-14 14:34 ` Chen Yu
2026-09-16 13:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260916123046.GE776954@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wanglu.priv@gmail.com \
--cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com \
--cc=zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com \
--cc=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®