Re: [PATCH] PCI: iproc: Use pci_alloc_host_bridge() on BCMA

[Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>]

On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 09:02:23PM +0300, Semih Baskan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 10:59:29AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > And why do we need pcie-iproc-platform, since pcie-iproc-bcma.c will
> > claim them?
> 
> I do not see anything on Northstar that needs it. I think
> pcie-iproc-platform is the front end for the iProc SoCs that have no
> bcma bus.
> 
> > Is there a requirement that pcie-iproc-platform must be able to claim
> > the PCI host bridge if CONFIG_PCIE_IPROC_BCMA is not enabled?
> 
> None that I can find. Neither symbol depends on the other, no in-tree
> defconfig sets either one, and multi_v7_defconfig gets both from their
> defaults. OpenWrt builds only the BCMA one. The one use of the
> platform driver on Northstar I know of is Rafał's: 767012397976 says
> it was tested with it on BCM47094, and his test in the thread on the
> axi ranges ran both drivers on his board. The platform driver
> enumerated the two BCM4366 devices on its own:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/93ee7456-4179-4d78-b980-1df0b7e0278a@gmail.com/
> I have not looked outside the tree.

Then it seems like we should remove the "brcm,iproc-pcie" compatible
from DTs for platforms where bcma can enumerate it via EROM.  Those
platforms can enable CONFIG_PCIE_IPROC_BCMA.  They still need the PCIe
controller node in DT so they can use the wifi nodes below it, but if
there's no "brcm,iproc-pcie" compatible, pcie-iproc-platform shouldn't
do anything.

Arnd, Rafał, jump in if I'm in the weeds here.