From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: zjamg <ndaugoing@gmail.com>
Cc: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>,
Christophe Ricard <christophe.ricard@gmail.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] nfc: nci: do not process unexpected or invalid CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 14:29:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921132949.GQ13925@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918020412.82878-2-ndaugoing@gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 10:04:12AM +0800, zjamg wrote:
> From: Yuchao Zhang <ndaugoing@gmail.com>
>
> When an NCI_OP_CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP packet is received,
> nci_core_conn_create_rsp_packet() parses it and creates a logical
> connection entry in ndev->conn_info_list.
>
> However, nci_core_conn_create_rsp_packet() suffers from several issues:
> 1. It does not verify that a connection creation command is currently
> pending. An unsolicited or delayed CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP packet
> unconditionally creates a rogue connection and calls
> nci_req_complete(), prematurely completing unrelated in-flight
> requests.
> 2. It lacks bounds checking against sizeof(struct nci_core_conn_create_rsp)
> for the packet payload, leading to potential out-of-bounds reads.
> 3. It does not validate rsp->conn_id. Dynamic logical connections
> assigned by the NFCC must not use NCI_STATIC_RF_CONN_ID (0x00) or
> collide with any existing connection ID.
> 4. It inserts the new connection at the head of ndev->conn_info_list
> via list_add(). Because connection lookup (e.g. in nci_tx_work() and
> nci_data_exchange_complete()) uses first-match semantics, prepending
> allows a newly created connection with a duplicate ID to shadow the
> static RF connection or earlier connections.
> Furthermore, ndev->hci_dev->conn_info is mistakenly updated even
> when the destination type is not NCI_DESTINATION_NFCEE because
> cur_params.id and nfcee_id both default to 0.
>
> Fix this by:
> - Adding an NCI_CONN_CREATE_PENDING flag in enum nci_flag to track
> in-flight connection creation commands, and rejecting unsolicited or
> delayed responses.
> - Adding packet length verification before reading payload fields.
> - Rejecting responses that allocate NCI_STATIC_RF_CONN_ID or duplicate
> existing connection IDs.
> - Appending new connections with list_add_tail() instead of list_add().
> - Restricting ndev->hci_dev->conn_info assignment to NFCEE destination
> types.
>
> Fixes: 736bb9577407 ("NFC: nci: Support logical connections management")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Yuchao Zhang <ndaugoing@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/net/nfc/nci_core.h | 1 +
> net/nfc/nci/core.c | 2 ++
> net/nfc/nci/rsp.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h b/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h
> index 664d5058e66e..a4652ffc173d 100644
> --- a/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h
> +++ b/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ enum nci_flag {
> NCI_DATA_EXCHANGE,
> NCI_DATA_EXCHANGE_TO,
> NCI_UNREG,
> + NCI_CONN_CREATE_PENDING,
> };
Hi,
This patch seems to use a similar mechanism to another patch that
you recently posted
- [PATCH 1/1] nfc: nci: ignore unexpected CORE_RESET_NTF
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260918013337.82214-2-ndaugoing@gmail.com/
I forwarded an AI-generated review in response to that patch
and I am concerned that this patch has similar issues centred around:
* Use of a single-bit gate, in this case NCI_CONN_CREATE_PENDING, may
match against a late-arriving packet for an earlier request
* Concurrency between a work queue handler and other execution paths
As this patch seems related to the one at the link above I would suggest
either concluding one first. Or provided any updated versions in the form
of a patch-set that includes both patches. And I would suggest the first
of those options would lead to a faster conclusion.
...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 2:04 [PATCH 0/1] " zjamg
2026-09-18 2:04 ` [PATCH 1/1] " zjamg
2026-09-21 13:29 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260921132949.GQ13925@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.ricard@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@ixit.cz \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ndaugoing@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®