* [PATCH 0/1] nfc: nci: do not process unexpected or invalid CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP
@ 2026-09-18 2:04 zjamg
2026-09-18 2:04 ` [PATCH 1/1] " zjamg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: zjamg @ 2026-09-18 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Heidelberg
Cc: Christophe Ricard, David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, oe-linux-nfc, netdev,
linux-kernel, Yuchao Zhang
From: Yuchao Zhang <ndaugoing@gmail.com>
Hello,
This patch addresses several issues in the NCI core logical connection
handling where an unsolicited or malformed CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP packet
can corrupt connection tracking, shadow the static RF connection, and
cause TX queue stalls or hung waiters.
Problem Overview:
=================
In the NCI core stack, logical connections can be created by sending
NCI_OP_CORE_CONN_CREATE_CMD to the NFCC, which answers with
NCI_OP_CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP. nci_core_conn_create_rsp_packet() parses
this response and adds a new struct nci_conn_info to ndev->conn_info_list.
However, nci_core_conn_create_rsp_packet() had several vulnerabilities:
1. No Pending Command Check:
It did not check whether a connection creation command was actually
pending. An unsolicited or delayed CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP packet
unconditionally allocated and inserted a connection into
ndev->conn_info_list, and called nci_req_complete(ndev, status),
prematurely completing whatever unrelated request was in-flight.
2. Connection ID Collision & Shadowing:
Dynamic logical connections allocated by the NFCC must not use
NCI_STATIC_RF_CONN_ID (0x00) or collide with existing connections.
Furthermore, nci_core_conn_create_rsp_packet() used list_add() to
prepend the new connection to ndev->conn_info_list. Because
connection lookups (e.g. in nci_tx_work() and
nci_data_exchange_complete()) use first-match semantics, prepending
allowed an injected connection with conn_id = 0 to shadow
ndev->rf_conn_info. This caused:
- Cross-connection credit accounting in nci_tx_work().
- TX queue stall when credits == 0 (frame wedged without timer).
- Dropped RX completion (cb == NULL on the rogue connection, hanging
the real waiter registered by nci_transceive()).
3. Missing Length Validation:
The handler accessed payload fields without checking whether
skb->len >= sizeof(struct nci_core_conn_create_rsp), risking
out-of-bounds reads.
4. Spurious HCI conn_info Assignment:
ndev->hci_dev->conn_info was updated whenever cur_params.id matched
hci_dev->nfcee_id. Because both default to 0, non-NFCEE connections
(such as loopback) erroneously updated ndev->hci_dev->conn_info.
Solution:
=========
- Add an NCI_CONN_CREATE_PENDING flag in enum nci_flag to track
in-flight connection creation commands, and reject unsolicited or
delayed responses.
- Validate packet length before reading payload fields.
- Reject responses that allocate NCI_STATIC_RF_CONN_ID or duplicate
existing connection IDs.
- Append new connections with list_add_tail() instead of list_add().
- Restrict ndev->hci_dev->conn_info assignment to NFCEE destination
types.
Non-overlap with adjacent fixes:
================================
This issue does not overlap with the adjacent upstream fixes in this
area: Lin Ma's commit 1b1499a817c9 ("nfc: nci: fix the UAF of
rf_conn_info object") addresses a use-after-free in the conn_close
path, and Yun Zhou's commit d56575a2595e ("nfc: nci: fix use of
uninitialized memory in CORE_INIT_RSP parsing") addresses a different
packet. The problem fixed here is the list_add() head-insertion
combined with first-match lookup semantics (core.c:43-54), which lets
a forged connection shadow the real one.
Testing:
========
Verified with QEMU arm64 empirical test harness. Unsolicited
CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP frames were rejected with a rate-limited warning;
conn_count remained 1, and the static RF connection was not shadowed.
Verified with module compilation and checkpatch.pl (0 errors, 0 warnings).
Thanks,
Yuchao Zhang
Yuchao Zhang (1):
nfc: nci: do not process unexpected or invalid CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP
include/net/nfc/nci_core.h | 1 +
net/nfc/nci/core.c | 2 ++
net/nfc/nci/rsp.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/1] nfc: nci: do not process unexpected or invalid CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP 2026-09-18 2:04 [PATCH 0/1] nfc: nci: do not process unexpected or invalid CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP zjamg @ 2026-09-18 2:04 ` zjamg 2026-09-21 13:29 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: zjamg @ 2026-09-18 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Heidelberg Cc: Christophe Ricard, David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, oe-linux-nfc, netdev, linux-kernel, Yuchao Zhang, stable From: Yuchao Zhang <ndaugoing@gmail.com> When an NCI_OP_CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP packet is received, nci_core_conn_create_rsp_packet() parses it and creates a logical connection entry in ndev->conn_info_list. However, nci_core_conn_create_rsp_packet() suffers from several issues: 1. It does not verify that a connection creation command is currently pending. An unsolicited or delayed CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP packet unconditionally creates a rogue connection and calls nci_req_complete(), prematurely completing unrelated in-flight requests. 2. It lacks bounds checking against sizeof(struct nci_core_conn_create_rsp) for the packet payload, leading to potential out-of-bounds reads. 3. It does not validate rsp->conn_id. Dynamic logical connections assigned by the NFCC must not use NCI_STATIC_RF_CONN_ID (0x00) or collide with any existing connection ID. 4. It inserts the new connection at the head of ndev->conn_info_list via list_add(). Because connection lookup (e.g. in nci_tx_work() and nci_data_exchange_complete()) uses first-match semantics, prepending allows a newly created connection with a duplicate ID to shadow the static RF connection or earlier connections. Furthermore, ndev->hci_dev->conn_info is mistakenly updated even when the destination type is not NCI_DESTINATION_NFCEE because cur_params.id and nfcee_id both default to 0. Fix this by: - Adding an NCI_CONN_CREATE_PENDING flag in enum nci_flag to track in-flight connection creation commands, and rejecting unsolicited or delayed responses. - Adding packet length verification before reading payload fields. - Rejecting responses that allocate NCI_STATIC_RF_CONN_ID or duplicate existing connection IDs. - Appending new connections with list_add_tail() instead of list_add(). - Restricting ndev->hci_dev->conn_info assignment to NFCEE destination types. Fixes: 736bb9577407 ("NFC: nci: Support logical connections management") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Yuchao Zhang <ndaugoing@gmail.com> --- include/net/nfc/nci_core.h | 1 + net/nfc/nci/core.c | 2 ++ net/nfc/nci/rsp.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h b/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h index 664d5058e66e..a4652ffc173d 100644 --- a/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h +++ b/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ enum nci_flag { NCI_DATA_EXCHANGE, NCI_DATA_EXCHANGE_TO, NCI_UNREG, + NCI_CONN_CREATE_PENDING, }; /* NCI device states */ diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/core.c b/net/nfc/nci/core.c index 5f46c4b5720f..b5fa17f0524e 100644 --- a/net/nfc/nci/core.c +++ b/net/nfc/nci/core.c @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ static int __nci_request(struct nci_dev *ndev, } ndev->req_status = ndev->req_result = 0; + clear_bit(NCI_CONN_CREATE_PENDING, &ndev->flags); return rc; } @@ -709,6 +710,7 @@ static void nci_core_conn_create_req(struct nci_dev *ndev, const void *opt) { const struct core_conn_create_data *data = opt; + set_bit(NCI_CONN_CREATE_PENDING, &ndev->flags); nci_send_cmd(ndev, NCI_OP_CORE_CONN_CREATE_CMD, data->length, data->cmd); } diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/rsp.c b/net/nfc/nci/rsp.c index b0ab4f5acbce..a56a7392ab5e 100644 --- a/net/nfc/nci/rsp.c +++ b/net/nfc/nci/rsp.c @@ -305,15 +305,37 @@ static void nci_nfcee_mode_set_rsp_packet(struct nci_dev *ndev, static void nci_core_conn_create_rsp_packet(struct nci_dev *ndev, const struct sk_buff *skb) { - __u8 status = skb->data[0]; struct nci_conn_info *conn_info = NULL; const struct nci_core_conn_create_rsp *rsp; + __u8 status; + + if (skb->len < 1) + return; + status = skb->data[0]; pr_debug("status 0x%x\n", status); + if (!test_and_clear_bit(NCI_CONN_CREATE_PENDING, &ndev->flags)) { + pr_warn_ratelimited("unexpected CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP\n"); + return; + } + if (status == NCI_STATUS_OK) { + if (skb->len < sizeof(*rsp)) { + status = NCI_STATUS_SYNTAX_ERROR; + goto exit; + } + rsp = (struct nci_core_conn_create_rsp *)skb->data; + if (rsp->conn_id == NCI_STATIC_RF_CONN_ID || + nci_get_conn_info_by_conn_id(ndev, rsp->conn_id)) { + pr_warn_ratelimited("invalid or duplicate conn_id 0x%x\n", + rsp->conn_id); + status = NCI_STATUS_REJECTED; + goto exit; + } + conn_info = devm_kzalloc(&ndev->nfc_dev->dev, sizeof(*conn_info), GFP_KERNEL); if (!conn_info) { @@ -339,21 +361,22 @@ static void nci_core_conn_create_rsp_packet(struct nci_dev *ndev, */ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&conn_info->list); - list_add(&conn_info->list, &ndev->conn_info_list); + list_add_tail(&conn_info->list, &ndev->conn_info_list); - if (ndev->cur_params.id == ndev->hci_dev->nfcee_id) + if (conn_info->dest_type == NCI_DESTINATION_NFCEE && + ndev->cur_params.id == ndev->hci_dev->nfcee_id) ndev->hci_dev->conn_info = conn_info; - conn_info->conn_id = rsp->conn_id; conn_info->max_pkt_payload_len = rsp->max_ctrl_pkt_payload_len; atomic_set(&conn_info->credits_cnt, rsp->credits_cnt); } + nci_req_complete(ndev, status); + return; + free_conn_info: - if (status == NCI_STATUS_REJECTED) - devm_kfree(&ndev->nfc_dev->dev, conn_info); + devm_kfree(&ndev->nfc_dev->dev, conn_info); exit: - nci_req_complete(ndev, status); } -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] nfc: nci: do not process unexpected or invalid CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP 2026-09-18 2:04 ` [PATCH 1/1] " zjamg @ 2026-09-21 13:29 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2026-09-21 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zjamg Cc: David Heidelberg, Christophe Ricard, David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, oe-linux-nfc, netdev, linux-kernel, stable On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 10:04:12AM +0800, zjamg wrote: > From: Yuchao Zhang <ndaugoing@gmail.com> > > When an NCI_OP_CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP packet is received, > nci_core_conn_create_rsp_packet() parses it and creates a logical > connection entry in ndev->conn_info_list. > > However, nci_core_conn_create_rsp_packet() suffers from several issues: > 1. It does not verify that a connection creation command is currently > pending. An unsolicited or delayed CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP packet > unconditionally creates a rogue connection and calls > nci_req_complete(), prematurely completing unrelated in-flight > requests. > 2. It lacks bounds checking against sizeof(struct nci_core_conn_create_rsp) > for the packet payload, leading to potential out-of-bounds reads. > 3. It does not validate rsp->conn_id. Dynamic logical connections > assigned by the NFCC must not use NCI_STATIC_RF_CONN_ID (0x00) or > collide with any existing connection ID. > 4. It inserts the new connection at the head of ndev->conn_info_list > via list_add(). Because connection lookup (e.g. in nci_tx_work() and > nci_data_exchange_complete()) uses first-match semantics, prepending > allows a newly created connection with a duplicate ID to shadow the > static RF connection or earlier connections. > Furthermore, ndev->hci_dev->conn_info is mistakenly updated even > when the destination type is not NCI_DESTINATION_NFCEE because > cur_params.id and nfcee_id both default to 0. > > Fix this by: > - Adding an NCI_CONN_CREATE_PENDING flag in enum nci_flag to track > in-flight connection creation commands, and rejecting unsolicited or > delayed responses. > - Adding packet length verification before reading payload fields. > - Rejecting responses that allocate NCI_STATIC_RF_CONN_ID or duplicate > existing connection IDs. > - Appending new connections with list_add_tail() instead of list_add(). > - Restricting ndev->hci_dev->conn_info assignment to NFCEE destination > types. > > Fixes: 736bb9577407 ("NFC: nci: Support logical connections management") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Yuchao Zhang <ndaugoing@gmail.com> > --- > include/net/nfc/nci_core.h | 1 + > net/nfc/nci/core.c | 2 ++ > net/nfc/nci/rsp.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h b/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h > index 664d5058e66e..a4652ffc173d 100644 > --- a/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h > +++ b/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ enum nci_flag { > NCI_DATA_EXCHANGE, > NCI_DATA_EXCHANGE_TO, > NCI_UNREG, > + NCI_CONN_CREATE_PENDING, > }; Hi, This patch seems to use a similar mechanism to another patch that you recently posted - [PATCH 1/1] nfc: nci: ignore unexpected CORE_RESET_NTF https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260918013337.82214-2-ndaugoing@gmail.com/ I forwarded an AI-generated review in response to that patch and I am concerned that this patch has similar issues centred around: * Use of a single-bit gate, in this case NCI_CONN_CREATE_PENDING, may match against a late-arriving packet for an earlier request * Concurrency between a work queue handler and other execution paths As this patch seems related to the one at the link above I would suggest either concluding one first. Or provided any updated versions in the form of a patch-set that includes both patches. And I would suggest the first of those options would lead to a faster conclusion. ... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-21 13:29 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-09-18 2:04 [PATCH 0/1] nfc: nci: do not process unexpected or invalid CORE_CONN_CREATE_RSP zjamg 2026-09-18 2:04 ` [PATCH 1/1] " zjamg 2026-09-21 13:29 ` Simon Horman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®