mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>
To: <mhonap@nvidia.com>
Cc: <jgg@ziepe.ca>, <ankita@nvidia.com>, <jic23@kernel.org>,
	<dave.jiang@intel.com>, <alejandro.lucero-palau@amd.com>,
	<smadhavan@nvidia.com>, <corbet@lwn.net>,
	<skhan@linuxfoundation.org>, <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	<iweiny@kernel.org>, <ming.li@zohomail.com>, <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
	<skolothumtho@nvidia.com>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	<bhelgaas@google.com>, <dmatlack@google.com>, <kees@kernel.org>,
	<gustavoars@kernel.org>, <cjia@nvidia.com>, <kjaju@nvidia.com>,
	<vsethi@nvidia.com>, <zhiw@nvidia.com>,
	<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>,
	alex@shazbot.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 22/27] vfio/cxl: Clear the HDM access gate after a hot reset
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 20:13:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921201315.6e237710@shazbot.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916183540.3813685-23-mhonap@nvidia.com>

On Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:05:35 +0530
<mhonap@nvidia.com> wrote:

> From: Manish Honap <mhonap@nvidia.com>
> 
> The HDM memory fault inserts a PFN only when the decoder is in a
> known-good state (cxl->hdm_valid), so the host CPU never faults the
> coherent range into a disabled decoder.
> 
> VFIO_DEVICE_PCI_HOT_RESET drives a plain secondary bus reset rather than
> the CXL reset sequence, so nothing restores the decoder in the
> reset_done handler. A secondary bus reset only reaches a CXL endpoint
> when the upstream port has SBR unmasked (CXL r3.1 sec 8.1.5.2); in that
> case the reset decommits the decoder, so clear cxl->hdm_valid to keep a
> later fault from inserting a PFN into a dead decoder.
> 
> A subsequent VFIO_DEVICE_RESET runs the CXL reset sequence and restores
> it, and a masked SBR is a no-op that leaves the decoder intact.
> 
> vfio_cxl_sbr_unmasked() mirrors the cxl_sbr_masked() check the PCI core
> uses (drivers/pci/pci.c) for its own CXL bus reset.

This all sounds very broken.  If a hot reset is masked, it should fail,
not silently do nothing.  If a hot reset is unmasked, we can't just
invent that the user needs to follow it with a reset ioctl, and the
decoder is dead for the remainder of their session otherwise.

So on one hand, we have a reset we can't use because it doesn't do
anything, and on the other we have a reset that we can't use because in
doing something it makes the device effectively unrecoverable, without
some assumption to perform a reset ioctl.

Are bus resets just not supported on CXL devices through vfio-pci?
Thanks,

Alex

 
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Manish Honap <mhonap@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/pci/cxl/vfio_cxl_core.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/cxl/vfio_cxl_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/cxl/vfio_cxl_core.c
> index 37e8a3b54cfb..395b4a5b0956 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/cxl/vfio_cxl_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/cxl/vfio_cxl_core.c
> @@ -514,8 +514,46 @@ static void vfio_cxl_reset_prepare(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
>  {
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * A secondary bus reset only reaches a CXL endpoint when the upstream port
> + * has SBR unmasked (CXL r3.1 sec 8.1.5.2); otherwise the Bridge Control SBR
> + * bit is ignored and the decoder is left intact. Mirrors the cxl_sbr_masked()
> + * check the PCI core uses for its own CXL bus reset.
> + */
> +static bool vfio_cxl_sbr_unmasked(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(pdev);
> +	u16 dvsec, ctl;
> +
> +	if (!bridge)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	dvsec = pci_find_dvsec_capability(bridge, PCI_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
> +					  PCI_DVSEC_CXL_PORT);
> +	if (!dvsec)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (pci_read_config_word(bridge, dvsec + PCI_DVSEC_CXL_PORT_CTL, &ctl))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return ctl & PCI_DVSEC_CXL_PORT_CTL_UNMASK_SBR;
> +}
> +
>  static void vfio_cxl_reset_done(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
>  {
> +	struct vfio_cxl_state *cxl = vdev->cxl;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * VFIO_DEVICE_PCI_HOT_RESET drives a plain secondary bus reset, not the
> +	 * CXL-aware cxl_reset_bus_function(), so nothing restores the HDM
> +	 * decoder here. When the upstream port has SBR unmasked the reset
> +	 * decommits the decoder; gate host access to the HDM range so a later
> +	 * fault cannot insert a PFN into a dead decoder. A VFIO_DEVICE_RESET
> +	 * then runs the CXL reset sequence and restores it. A masked SBR is a
> +	 * no-op and leaves the decoder intact.
> +	 */
> +	if (vfio_cxl_sbr_unmasked(vdev->pdev))
> +		cxl->hdm_valid = false;
>  }
>  
>  static const struct vfio_cxl_ops vfio_cxl_ops = {


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-22  2:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-16 18:35 [PATCH v5 00/27] vfio/pci: Add CXL Type-2 device passthrough support mhonap
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 01/27] cxl/regs: Split the BAR block request and ioremap helpers mhonap
2026-09-22  1:28   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 02/27] cxl/regs: Let a BAR-owning driver own the component register block mhonap
2026-09-22  1:36   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 03/27] cxl: Move component register defines to uapi/cxl/cxl_regs.h mhonap
2026-09-22  1:43   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 04/27] cxl: Add cxl_reset_dvsec_sequence() for vfio-pci mhonap
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 05/27] vfio/pci: Add the CXL provider ops registration interface mhonap
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 06/27] vfio/pci: Detect CXL devices and load the CXL provider on demand mhonap
2026-09-17  8:48   ` Richard Cheng
2026-09-21 10:05     ` Manish Honap
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 07/27] vfio/pci: Honor -EPROBE_DEFER from CXL provider probe mhonap
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 08/27] vfio/pci: Fall back to plain vfio-pci when CXL init fails mhonap
2026-09-22  2:15   ` Alex Williamson
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 09/27] vfio/pci: Add a generic excluded-range list mhonap
2026-09-22  2:13   ` Alex Williamson
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 10/27] vfio/pci: Migrate MSI-X exclusion onto the " mhonap
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 11/27] vfio/pci: Virtualize the CXL DVSEC in vfio_pci_config.c mhonap
2026-09-22  2:14   ` Alex Williamson
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 12/27] vfio/pci: Call the CXL open and close hooks around device use mhonap
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 13/27] vfio/pci: Bracket PCI resets with the CXL reset hooks mhonap
2026-09-22  2:14   ` Alex Williamson
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 14/27] vfio/pci: Provide an opt-out for the CXL Type-2 extensions mhonap
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 15/27] vfio/cxl: Add the vfio-cxl provider module skeleton mhonap
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 16/27] vfio/cxl: Create the CXL memdev and set media ready at bind mhonap
2026-09-22  2:14   ` Alex Williamson
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 17/27] vfio/cxl: Own the whole component register BAR mhonap
2026-09-22  2:14   ` Alex Williamson
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 18/27] vfio/cxl: Expose the HDM memory region to the guest mhonap
2026-09-22  2:14   ` Alex Williamson
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 19/27] vfio/cxl: Contain HDM memory errors with memory_failure() mhonap
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 20/27] vfio/cxl: Expose the HDM decoder registers read-only to the guest mhonap
2026-09-22  2:13   ` Alex Williamson
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 21/27] vfio/cxl: Exclude the HDM decoder registers from direct BAR access mhonap
2026-09-17  7:28   ` Richard Cheng
2026-09-21  9:52     ` Manish Honap
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 22/27] vfio/cxl: Clear the HDM access gate after a hot reset mhonap
2026-09-22  2:13   ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 23/27] vfio/cxl: Describe the CXL device and decoder geometry to userspace mhonap
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 24/27] vfio/cxl: Export the HDM memory region as a dma-buf mhonap
2026-09-17  7:55   ` Richard Cheng
2026-09-21  9:58     ` Manish Honap
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 25/27] vfio/cxl: Run the CXL reset at the vfio reset points mhonap
2026-09-17  8:11   ` Richard Cheng
2026-09-21 10:01     ` Manish Honap
2026-09-22  2:13   ` Alex Williamson
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 26/27] Documentation: vfio-pci: Document CXL Type-2 device passthrough mhonap
2026-09-16 19:33   ` Gregory Price
2026-09-21  9:43     ` Manish Honap
2026-09-16 18:35 ` [PATCH v5 27/27] selftests/vfio: Add CXL Type-2 passthrough tests mhonap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260921201315.6e237710@shazbot.org \
    --to=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=alejandro.lucero-palau@amd.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=iweiny@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kjaju@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhonap@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=skolothumtho@nvidia.com \
    --cc=smadhavan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    --cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®