mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, lukas@wunner.de,
	terry.bowman@amd.com, kanie@linux.alibaba.com, olof@lixom.net,
	Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v14 2/4] PCI/ACPI: Tidy _OSC control bit checking
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 13:45:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260922204548.3884906-3-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922204548.3884906-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>

Add OSC_OWNER() helper to prettify checking the _OSC control bits to learn
whether the platform has granted us control of PCI features.  No functional
change intended.

[bhelgaas: split to separate patch, commit log]
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) <rafael@kernel.org>
---
Changes since v13

 * No change.  Picked up Rafael's Acked-by.

v13 posting
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260919162655.3499010-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com

 drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index 88c65f34e305..756dc2f055f5 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -993,6 +993,12 @@ static void acpi_pci_root_release_info(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
 	__acpi_pci_root_release_info(bridge->release_data);
 }
 
+#define OSC_OWNER(ctrl, bit, flag)		\
+	do {					\
+		if (!((ctrl) & (bit)))		\
+			flag = 0;		\
+	} while (0)
+
 struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
 				     struct acpi_pci_root_ops *ops,
 				     struct acpi_pci_root_info *info,
@@ -1003,6 +1009,7 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
 	int node = acpi_get_node(device->handle);
 	struct pci_bus *bus;
 	struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge;
+	u32 ctrl, ext_ctrl;
 
 	info->root = root;
 	info->bridge = device;
@@ -1028,21 +1035,21 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
 		goto out_release_info;
 
 	host_bridge = to_pci_host_bridge(bus->bridge);
-	if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
-		host_bridge->native_pcie_hotplug = 0;
-	if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
-		host_bridge->native_shpc_hotplug = 0;
-	if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL))
-		host_bridge->native_aer = 0;
-	if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL))
-		host_bridge->native_pme = 0;
-	if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL))
-		host_bridge->native_ltr = 0;
-	if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL))
-		host_bridge->native_dpc = 0;
-
-	if (!(root->osc_ext_control_set & OSC_CXL_ERROR_REPORTING_CONTROL))
-		host_bridge->native_cxl_error = 0;
+
+	ctrl = root->osc_control_set;
+	ext_ctrl = root->osc_ext_control_set;
+
+	OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL,
+		  host_bridge->native_pcie_hotplug);
+	OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL,
+		  host_bridge->native_shpc_hotplug);
+	OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL, host_bridge->native_aer);
+	OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL, host_bridge->native_pme);
+	OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL, host_bridge->native_ltr);
+	OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL, host_bridge->native_dpc);
+
+	OSC_OWNER(ext_ctrl, OSC_CXL_ERROR_REPORTING_CONTROL,
+		  host_bridge->native_cxl_error);
 
 	acpi_dev_power_up_children_with_adr(device);
 
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-22 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-22 20:45 [PATCH v14 0/4] Simplify PCIe native ownership Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-22 20:45 ` [PATCH v14 1/4] PCI: Assume control of portdrv-related features only when portdrv enabled Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-22 20:45 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan [this message]
2026-09-22 20:45 ` [PATCH v14 3/4] PCI/ACPI: Centralize pcie_ports_native checking Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-23  1:44   ` Guixin Liu
2026-10-01 20:54   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 21:48     ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-10-01 22:14       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-09-22 20:45 ` [PATCH v14 4/4] PCI: Centralize pci_aer_available() checking Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260922204548.3884906-3-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®