From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, lukas@wunner.de,
terry.bowman@amd.com, kanie@linux.alibaba.com, olof@lixom.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 3/4] PCI/ACPI: Centralize pcie_ports_native checking
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 15:54:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001205404.GA2718182@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922204548.3884906-4-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 01:45:47PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> If the user booted with "pcie_ports=native", we take control of the PCIe
> port services unconditionally, regardless of what _OSC says.
>
> Centralize the testing of pcie_ports_native in acpi_pci_root_create(),
> where we interpret the _OSC results, so other places only have to check
> host_bridge->native_X and we don't have to sprinkle tests of
> pcie_ports_native everywhere.
>
> Rather than overriding the host_bridge->native_X flags after the fact,
> fold "pcie_ports=native" into the _OSC control mask we evaluate, i.e.,
> proceed as though the platform had granted control of the port services.
> That way there is a single mechanism deciding each native_X flag, and we
> can report exactly which features we are overriding _OSC for instead of
> just noting that we are overriding something:
>
> acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS forcing control ("pcie_ports=native") of [PCIeHotplug PME AER DPC]
>
> Forcing host_bridge->native_aer also restores DPC service binding under
> "pcie_ports=native", which regressed in commit 97ca178c899d ("PCI/DPC:
> Allow DPC on all Downstream Ports when OS controls AER"). That commit
> replaced the AER service test in get_port_device_capability() with
> host->native_aer, so DPC stayed off when host_bridge->native_aer was not
> set.
>
> This also extends "pcie_ports=native" to host_bridge->native_dpc, which
> had no pcie_ports_native fallback before. That effect is narrow.
> native_dpc is only consumed by pci_dpc_recovered(), where with
> CONFIG_PCIE_EDR=n it previously gave up immediately and now lets pciehp
> wait for DPC recovery before treating a Link Down as a hotplug event.
>
> host_bridge->native_ltr is deliberately not forced. "pcie_ports="
> controls PCIe port services and LTR is not one. There is no
> PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_LTR, and native_ltr is only used by
> pci_configure_ltr() to enable ASPM L1.2, so forcing it would be an ASPM
> policy decision users did not ask for.
>
> SHPC hotplug is left alone for a simpler reason: SHPC is a conventional
> PCI feature rather than a PCIe one, so "pcie_ports=" has no bearing on
> it.
>
> Fixes: 97ca178c899d ("PCI/DPC: Allow DPC on all Downstream Ports when OS controls AER")
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20260901064554.2178688-1-kanie@linux.alibaba.com/
> [bhelgaas: commit log, rework OSC_PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_CONTROLS, logging]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/bc87c9e675118960949043a832bed86bc22becbd.1603766889.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) <rafael@kernel.org> # ACPI core
> ---
> Changes since v13
>
> * Added the Fixes: tag for 97ca178c899d. (Guixin Liu)
> * Reworded the commit log (Sashiko AI review).
> * No code change. Picked up Rafael's Acked-by.
>
> v13 posting
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260919162655.3499010-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com
>
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 3 ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer_cxl_rch.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c | 6 +++---
> 7 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index 756dc2f055f5..2494811dd69b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -999,6 +999,19 @@ static void acpi_pci_root_release_info(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
> flag = 0; \
> } while (0)
>
> +#define FLAG(x) ((x) ? '+' : '-')
> +
> +/*
> + * _OSC control bits for the features implemented by the PCIe port driver,
> + * i.e., the ones "pcie_ports=native" applies to. LTR and SHPC hotplug are
> + * negotiated via _OSC as well, but they are not portdrv services, so
> + * "pcie_ports=" has no bearing on them.
> + */
> +#define OSC_PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_CONTROLS (OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL | \
> + OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL | \
> + OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL | \
> + OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL)
> +
> struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
> struct acpi_pci_root_ops *ops,
> struct acpi_pci_root_info *info,
> @@ -1039,6 +1052,21 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
> ctrl = root->osc_control_set;
> ext_ctrl = root->osc_ext_control_set;
>
> + /*
> + * If the user specified "pcie_ports=native", use the PCIe port
> + * services regardless of what _OSC says, i.e., proceed as though the
> + * platform had granted us control of them. This may conflict with
> + * firmware that expects to own those features.
> + */
> + if (pcie_ports_native) {
> + u32 override = OSC_PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_CONTROLS & ~ctrl;
> +
> + if (override)
> + decode_osc_control(root, "OS forcing control (\"pcie_ports=native\") of",
> + override);
> + ctrl |= override;
> + }
> +
> OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL,
> host_bridge->native_pcie_hotplug);
> OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL,
> @@ -1051,6 +1079,14 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
> OSC_OWNER(ext_ctrl, OSC_CXL_ERROR_REPORTING_CONTROL,
> host_bridge->native_cxl_error);
>
> + dev_info(&root->device->dev, "OS native features: SHPCHotplug%c PCIeHotplug%c PME%c AER%c DPC%c LTR%c\n",
> + FLAG(host_bridge->native_shpc_hotplug),
> + FLAG(host_bridge->native_pcie_hotplug),
> + FLAG(host_bridge->native_pme),
> + FLAG(host_bridge->native_aer),
> + FLAG(host_bridge->native_dpc),
I think the native_dpc printed here is inaccurate if booted with
"pci=dpc-native", isn't it?
Can we test pcie_ports_dpc_native above, similar to what we did with
pcie_ports_native?
The DPC probe handling still seems kind of convoluted. In portdrv.c,
we have this:
get_port_device_capability()
{
if (pci_find_ext_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_DPC) &&
pci_aer_available() &&
(pcie_ports_dpc_native || host->native_aer))
services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_DPC;
And then we have this in dpc.c:
dpc_probe()
{
if (!pcie_aer_is_native(pdev) && !pcie_ports_dpc_native)
return -ENOTSUPP;
The combination of get_port_device_capability() and dpc_probe() makes
my head hurt.
It seems like the DPC clause of get_port_device_capability() should be
parallel to the AER clause, i.e., set PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_DPC if the
device has a DPC Capability and the OS owns DPC (host->native_dpc).
Anything other than that needs explanation.
I'm confused about why host->native_dpc is not involved in the
dpc_probe() path at all.
> + FLAG(host_bridge->native_ltr));
> +
> acpi_dev_power_up_children_with_adr(device);
>
> pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
> index 2cafd3b26f34..b42829cf1377 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
> @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static bool pme_is_native(struct pcie_device *dev)
> const struct pci_host_bridge *host;
>
> host = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->port->bus);
> - return pcie_ports_native || host->native_pme;
> + return host->native_pme;
> }
>
> static void pciehp_disable_interrupt(struct pcie_device *dev)
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> index 42d545edd7fa..1150f2fbabf4 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> @@ -812,9 +812,6 @@ bool pciehp_is_native(struct pci_dev *bridge)
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE))
> return false;
>
> - if (pcie_ports_native)
> - return true;
> -
> host = pci_find_host_bridge(bridge->bus);
> return host->native_pcie_hotplug;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index d8dcd238fda1..e84dd686582a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ int pcie_aer_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev)
> if (!dev->aer_cap)
> return 0;
>
> - return pcie_ports_native || host->native_aer;
> + return host->native_aer;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(pcie_aer_is_native, "CXL");
>
> @@ -1847,7 +1847,7 @@ static pci_ers_result_t aer_root_reset(struct pci_dev *dev)
> */
> aer = root ? root->aer_cap : 0;
>
> - if ((host->native_aer || pcie_ports_native) && aer)
> + if (host->native_aer && aer)
> aer_disable_irq(root);
>
> if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC || type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END) {
> @@ -1862,7 +1862,7 @@ static pci_ers_result_t aer_root_reset(struct pci_dev *dev)
> pci_is_root_bus(dev->bus) ? "Root" : "Downstream", rc);
> }
>
> - if ((host->native_aer || pcie_ports_native) && aer) {
> + if (host->native_aer && aer) {
> /* Clear Root Error Status */
> pci_read_config_dword(root, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, ®32);
> pci_write_config_dword(root, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, reg32);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer_cxl_rch.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer_cxl_rch.c
> index e471eefec9c4..b480dad8bbf4 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer_cxl_rch.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer_cxl_rch.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static bool cxl_error_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> struct pci_host_bridge *host = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->bus);
>
> - return (pcie_ports_native || host->native_aer);
> + return host->native_aer;
> }
>
> static int cxl_rch_handle_error_iter(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> index d77403d8855b..1a7fc71c79d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
> * it is responsible for clearing this status. In that case, the
> * signaling device may not even be visible to the OS.
> */
> - if (host->native_aer || pcie_ports_native) {
> + if (host->native_aer) {
> pcie_clear_device_status(dev);
> pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(dev);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c
> index a9cbfc1d2bc7..32fc623dd410 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
> if (dev->is_pciehp &&
> (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
> pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM) &&
> - (pcie_ports_native || host->native_pcie_hotplug)) {
> + host->native_pcie_hotplug) {
> services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_HP;
>
> /*
> @@ -240,14 +240,14 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
> if ((pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
> pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC) &&
> dev->aer_cap && pci_aer_available() &&
> - (pcie_ports_native || host->native_aer))
> + host->native_aer)
> services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER;
> #endif
>
> /* Root Ports and Root Complex Event Collectors may generate PMEs */
> if ((pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
> pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC) &&
> - (pcie_ports_native || host->native_pme)) {
> + host->native_pme) {
> services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_PME;
>
> /*
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 20:45 [PATCH v14 0/4] Simplify PCIe native ownership Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-22 20:45 ` [PATCH v14 1/4] PCI: Assume control of portdrv-related features only when portdrv enabled Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-22 20:45 ` [PATCH v14 2/4] PCI/ACPI: Tidy _OSC control bit checking Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-22 20:45 ` [PATCH v14 3/4] PCI/ACPI: Centralize pcie_ports_native checking Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-23 1:44 ` Guixin Liu
2026-10-01 20:54 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2026-10-01 21:48 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-10-01 22:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-09-22 20:45 ` [PATCH v14 4/4] PCI: Centralize pci_aer_available() checking Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261001205404.GA2718182@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®