Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] mm: Switch device DAX to section-based vmemmap optimization

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Sun, 27 Sep 2026 18:51:15 +0800 Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> wrote:

> 
> 
> > On Sep 27, 2026, at 13:51, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Sun, 27 Sep 2026 10:54:29 +0800 Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> After the HugeTLB conversion, optimized vmemmap state is described by
> >> the memory section and the sparse-vmemmap population path can allocate or
> >> reuse shared tail vmemmap pages based on that metadata. Device DAX still
> >> uses the older DAX-specific population model, including a separate tail
> >> vmemmap page reservation and architecture-specific logic to locate or
> >> populate reusable tail pages.
> >> 
> >> This series makes device DAX use the same section-based model. Device DAX
> >> records the compound page order from pgmap->vmemmap_shift in section
> >> metadata before vmemmap population, uses the common per-zone shared tail
> >> vmemmap page, and drops the extra reserved tail page. The powerpc radix
> >> path is updated to use the same shared tail-page helper, so the generic
> >> and powerpc DAX paths follow the same reservation model.
> > 
> > Thanks, I've updated mm-unstable to this version.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > 
> > Sashiko asked a thing:
> > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260927025441.741633-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com
> 
> Sashiko said page->refcount can overflow by incrementing it over 2.14 billion
> times when mapping more than **524 TB** of DEV-DAX memory on a single NUMA
> node, where the pages share the same node, order, and zone.
> 
> I am not aware of any practical hardware configuration approaching this
> topology today.
> 
> Handling that theoretical limit would add non-trivial lifetime or
> architecture-specific teardown complexity. Without a concrete hardware
> requirement, I prefer not to over-engineer the current series. We can revisit
> it when such a system or use case becomes realistic.

OK.  Presumably it would be cheap to add a check for this craziness and
return ENOSOMETHING?