mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <chleroy@kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/12] mm/sparse-vmemmap: set compound page order for device DAX
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 09:30:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <751f6586-625b-4485-9f27-409fdf38bf3e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260927025441.741633-7-songmuchun@bytedance.com>

On 9/27/26 04:54, Muchun Song wrote:
> Device DAX can use vmemmap optimization only when a full section is
> populated with a compound-page geometry. Record that geometry as the
> compound page order in section metadata before populating the section, so
> later vmemmap accounting and population decisions can use the section state
> directly.
> 
> Clear the compound page order when the section becomes empty again. Also
> reject partial additions to a section that already has optimized vmemmap
> mappings. compound_nr_pages() determines how many struct pages to
> initialize with a section as the smallest granularity. A section therefore
> cannot safely mix optimized and ordinary vmemmap layouts.
> 
> Partial additions continue to use ordinary vmemmap population, so they do
> not save vmemmap memory. Such additions are uncommon, and the lost saving
> is negligible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> Acked-by: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
> ---
> v3:
> - Update the subject and commit message to use compound page order
>   terminology
> - Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP
> 
> v2:
> - Explain why optimized and ordinary layouts cannot share a section
>   (suggested by Qi Zheng)
> - Collect Acked-by from Qi Zheng
> ---

[...]>
>  static struct page * __meminit section_activate(int nid, unsigned long pfn,
> @@ -838,8 +840,13 @@ static struct page * __meminit section_activate(int nid, unsigned long pfn,
>  	struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
>  	struct mem_section_usage *usage = NULL;
>  	struct page *memmap;
> +	unsigned int order;
>  	int rc;
>  
> +	order = vmemmap_can_optimize(altmap, pgmap) ? pgmap->vmemmap_shift : 0;
> +	if (nr_pages < PAGES_PER_SECTION && section_compound_order(ms))
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);

Hm. Why should we support optimizing the vmemmap in case we fall into the same
memory section as boot memory?

In that case, there already is a memmap allocated during boot for the entire
section. IOW, we really shouldn't mess with the vmemmap in case we have an early
section.

But maybe I am missing something and this is already disallowed?

-- 
Cheers,

David

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-29  7:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-27  2:54 [PATCH v5 00/12] mm: Switch device DAX to section-based vmemmap optimization Muchun Song
2026-09-27  2:54 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] mm/sparse-vmemmap: factor out shared vmemmap tail page allocation Muchun Song
2026-09-29  7:16   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-29  7:55     ` Muchun Song
2026-09-27  2:54 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] mm/sparse-vmemmap: allocate shared tail page array dynamically Muchun Song
2026-09-29  7:21   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-29  8:00     ` Muchun Song
2026-09-27  2:54 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] mm/sparse-vmemmap: introduce CONFIG_VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION Muchun Song
2026-09-29  7:11   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-29  7:53     ` Muchun Song
2026-09-29  8:43       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-27  2:54 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] mm/sparse-vmemmap: open-code init_compound_tail() Muchun Song
2026-09-27  2:54 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] mm/sparse-vmemmap: prepare DAX vmemmap population for compound page orders Muchun Song
2026-09-29  7:24   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-29  8:04     ` Muchun Song
2026-09-27  2:54 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] mm/sparse-vmemmap: set compound page order for device DAX Muchun Song
2026-09-29  7:30   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-09-29  8:22     ` Muchun Song
2026-09-29  8:43       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-27  2:54 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] mm/sparse-vmemmap: switch device DAX to shared tail vmemmap pages Muchun Song
2026-09-28  4:41   ` [PATCH] fixup! " Muchun Song
2026-09-29  7:36   ` [PATCH v5 07/12] " David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-29  8:36     ` Muchun Song
2026-09-27  2:54 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] mm/sparse-vmemmap: move vmemmap optimization helpers to a public header Muchun Song
2026-09-29  7:39   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-29  8:44     ` Muchun Song
2026-09-27  2:54 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] powerpc/mm: switch device DAX to shared tail vmemmap pages Muchun Song
2026-09-29  8:44   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-27  2:54 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] mm/sparse-vmemmap: drop the extra tail page from device DAX reservation Muchun Song
2026-09-29  7:45   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-27  2:54 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] mm/sparse-vmemmap: drop unused section_nr_vmemmap_pages() arguments Muchun Song
2026-09-29  7:41   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-27  2:54 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] Documentation/mm: update DAX vmemmap deduplication docs Muchun Song
2026-09-29  7:43   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-27  5:51 ` [PATCH v5 00/12] mm: Switch device DAX to section-based vmemmap optimization Andrew Morton
2026-09-27 10:51   ` Muchun Song
2026-09-27 19:54     ` Andrew Morton
2026-09-28  4:25       ` Muchun Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=751f6586-625b-4485-9f27-409fdf38bf3e@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®