mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>, Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
	Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
	Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 13/15] perf/x86: Validate event type before topdown/mem-loads classification
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 15:43:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260928074309.898043-14-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928074309.898043-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

Software events can be grouped with x86 PMU events. While iterating an
x86 event group, a non-x86 event may be misclassified as a SLOTS,
topdown metric or mem-loads{,-aux} events if its config bits happen to
match the x86 masks.

Require is_x86_event() before classifying SLOTS, topdown metric or
mem-loads{,-aux} events to avoid false matches on software events.

Fixes: 7b2c05a15d29 ("perf/x86/intel: Generic support for hardware TopDown metrics")
Fixes: 61b985e3e775 ("perf/x86/intel: Add perf core PMU support for Sapphire Rapids")
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c |  8 ++++++--
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 14 ++++++++------
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 0d360fba4b79..6cc1462c9c82 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -4809,12 +4809,16 @@ static bool is_available_metric_event(struct perf_event *event)
 
 static inline bool is_mem_loads_event(struct perf_event *event)
 {
-	return (event->attr.config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) == X86_CONFIG(.event=0xcd, .umask=0x01);
+	return is_x86_event(event) &&
+	       ((event->attr.config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) ==
+		X86_CONFIG(.event = 0xcd, .umask = 0x01));
 }
 
 static inline bool is_mem_loads_aux_event(struct perf_event *event)
 {
-	return (event->attr.config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) == X86_CONFIG(.event=0x03, .umask=0x82);
+	return is_x86_event(event) &&
+	       ((event->attr.config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) ==
+		X86_CONFIG(.event = 0x03, .umask = 0x82));
 }
 
 static inline bool require_mem_loads_aux_event(struct perf_event *event)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index e274802ef062..55f9684152c9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -96,18 +96,22 @@ static inline bool is_topdown_count(struct perf_event *event)
 	return event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN;
 }
 
+int is_x86_event(struct perf_event *event);
+
 static inline bool is_metric_event(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	u64 config = event->attr.config;
 
-	return ((config & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT) == 0) &&
-		((config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) >= INTEL_TD_METRIC_RETIRING)  &&
-		((config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) <= INTEL_TD_METRIC_MAX);
+	return is_x86_event(event) &&
+	       ((config & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT) == 0) &&
+	       ((config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) >= INTEL_TD_METRIC_RETIRING) &&
+	       ((config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) <= INTEL_TD_METRIC_MAX);
 }
 
 static inline bool is_slots_event(struct perf_event *event)
 {
-	return (event->attr.config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) == INTEL_TD_SLOTS;
+	return is_x86_event(event) &&
+	       (event->attr.config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) == INTEL_TD_SLOTS;
 }
 
 static inline bool is_topdown_event(struct perf_event *event)
@@ -115,8 +119,6 @@ static inline bool is_topdown_event(struct perf_event *event)
 	return is_metric_event(event) || is_slots_event(event);
 }
 
-int is_x86_event(struct perf_event *event);
-
 static inline bool check_leader_group(struct perf_event *leader, int flags)
 {
 	return is_x86_event(leader) ? !!(leader->hw.flags & flags) : false;
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-28  7:42 [PATCH 00/15] perf/x86: Fix sampling bugs and relax slots-event grouping Dapeng Mi
2026-09-28  7:42 ` [PATCH 01/15] perf/x86/intel: Guard leader sibling walk on nr_siblings Dapeng Mi
2026-09-28  7:42 ` [PATCH 02/15] perf/x86/intel: Reset active_fixed_ctrl_val on CPU teardown Dapeng Mi
2026-09-28  7:42 ` [PATCH 03/15] perf/x86/intel: Reset active_pebs_data_cfg " Dapeng Mi
2026-09-28  7:42 ` [PATCH 04/15] perf/x86/intel: Reset cached acr_cfg_b[] and cfg_c_val[] " Dapeng Mi
2026-09-28  7:42 ` [PATCH 05/15] perf/x86/intel: Pass correct PEBS counter mask to no-drain update path Dapeng Mi
2026-09-28  7:43 ` [PATCH 06/15] perf/x86/intel: Limit PEBS counter iteration to valid array bounds Dapeng Mi
2026-09-28  7:43 ` [PATCH 07/15] perf/x86/intel: Reject SAMPLE_READ for no-counter-snapshot ACR events Dapeng Mi
2026-09-28  7:43 ` [PATCH 08/15] perf/x86/intel: Fix stale PEBS count without counter-group support Dapeng Mi
2026-09-28  7:43 ` [PATCH 09/15] perf/x86/intel: Refactor intel_pmu_drain_arch_pebs() Dapeng Mi
2026-09-28  7:43 ` [PATCH 10/15] perf/x86/intel: Refactor intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl() Dapeng Mi
2026-09-28  7:43 ` [PATCH 11/15] perf/x86/intel: Fix invalid PEBS counts with counter-group support Dapeng Mi
2026-09-28  7:43 ` [PATCH 12/15] perf/x86/intel: Make ACR static_call update architectural Dapeng Mi
2026-09-28  7:43 ` Dapeng Mi [this message]
2026-09-28  7:43 ` [PATCH 14/15] perf/core: Add event_caps dependency flags Dapeng Mi
2026-09-28  7:43 ` [PATCH 15/15] perf/x86/intel: Allow Topdown metrics with a non-leader slots event Dapeng Mi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260928074309.898043-14-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
    --cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
    --cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®