From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@gmail.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>,
Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] drm/bridge: Add a BPF-based MIPI-DSI panel driver
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 19:37:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260928163711.GA210522@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928-drm-mipi-dsi-panel-ebpf-v1-0-5244926aace4@kernel.org>
Hi Maxime,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 06:22:00PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Panels in general, and MIPI-DSI panels in particular, are pretty
> difficult to support and require pretty much a panel driver for each
> panel produced. Most of them are pretty simple, and require an opaque
> initialization sequence that is usually poorly documented.
>
> This creates a tension between OEMs and distros because OEMs will
> typically get a new panel to react to a sourcing issue during
> production, and thus need some swift turnaround between getting their
> new panel and it being operational in the OS. Distributions on the other
> hand can take years to ship a kernel with that new panel driver.
>
> To solve this, I followed the example of HID-BPF and wrote a panel
> driver that will rely on BPF programs to perform the panel
> initialization. That way, we can ship the programs separately from the
> kernel, and with a different lifecycle. If this driver is accepted, the
> plan is to have a userspace component started by udev to identify and
> load the right BPF program for the panels found on the device.
Interesting idea.
How would that work for devices that want early display support ? In
particular, how does it interact with your recent work on "fastboot"
support (with the kernel drivers taking over a running display
configured by the boot loader) ?
I'm also wondering about the incentives for vendors to upstream the
code. How will we avoid having a proliferation of out-of-tree drivers ?
> This driver is fully functional and works with both 5" and 7" Touch
> Display 2 panels for the RaspberryPi. However, it breaks away from the
> typical panel driver in multiple ways:
>
> - BPF programs can only be loaded by userspace. This leaves us with two
> choices:
>
> * We prevent the driver from loading until the script itself is
> loaded. This has the side effect of preventing any other output to
> be used until the initramfs is ran at the earliest, and possibly
> ever if the loader isn't installed for example.
>
> * Or we probe the driver all the time, but only report it as connected
> once a program has been registered. This is somewhat unconventional,
> but allows the other outputs to be functional, *and* allows the user
> to force the output if their panel doesn't require any
> initialization or during debugging. I chose this solution.
>
> - It's not a panel driver, but a bridge one, which is also pretty
> unconventional. This is required because panel drivers don't have
> access to a detect callback that is required for the above, but I also
> think that the recent work from Luca blurs the line from panels and
> bridges and we'll end up going that road anyway.
>
> Let me know what you think,
> Maxime
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> ---
> Maxime Ripard (6):
> dt-bindings: display: Add panel-mipi-dsi-bpf generic panel binding
> drm/panel: Add generic MIPI-DSI panel driver with BPF init sequences
> drm/panel: dsi-bpf: Add BPF program build infrastructure and helper header
> drm/panel: dsi-bpf: Add Raspberry Pi 7-inch panel BPF program
> drm/panel: dsi-bpf: Add Raspberry Pi 5-inch panel BPF program
> [DO NOT MERGE] arm64: dts: broadcom: Add Raspberry Pi ILI9881C DSI panel overlays
>
> .../bindings/display/panel/panel-mipi-dsi-bpf.yaml | 184 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile | 8 +
> .../bcm2711-rpi-4-b-dsi-ili9881-5inch.dtso | 22 +
> .../bcm2711-rpi-4-b-dsi-ili9881-7inch.dtso | 22 +
> .../dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-4-b-dsi-ili9881.dtsi | 65 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig | 3 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/bpf/Kconfig | 28 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/bpf/Makefile | 10 +
> .../gpu/drm/panel/bpf/panel-bpf-mipi-dsi-core.c | 452 +++++++++++++++++++++
> .../gpu/drm/panel/bpf/panel-bpf-mipi-dsi-kfuncs.c | 278 +++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/bpf/panel-bpf-mipi-dsi-ops.c | 242 +++++++++++
> .../gpu/drm/panel/bpf/panel-bpf-mipi-dsi-trace.c | 4 +
> .../gpu/drm/panel/bpf/panel-bpf-mipi-dsi-trace.h | 246 +++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/bpf/panel-bpf-mipi-dsi.h | 264 ++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/bpf/progs/Makefile | 93 +++++
> .../panel/bpf/progs/Raspberrypi__dsi-5inch.bpf.c | 266 ++++++++++++
> .../panel/bpf/progs/Raspberrypi__dsi-7inch.bpf.c | 271 ++++++++++++
> .../gpu/drm/panel/bpf/progs/panel-bpf-mipi-dsi.h | 95 +++++
> 19 files changed, 2554 insertions(+)
> ---
> base-commit: 6e375de99d0c420169481fcd36064177ab55b09d
> change-id: 20260928-drm-mipi-dsi-panel-ebpf-d78b72a9c47f
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 16:22 Maxime Ripard
2026-09-28 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: display: Add panel-mipi-dsi-bpf generic panel binding Maxime Ripard
2026-09-28 19:16 ` Neil Armstrong
2026-09-28 20:40 ` Rob Herring
2026-09-29 8:39 ` Maxime Ripard
2026-09-28 20:43 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-09-28 16:22 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/panel: Add generic MIPI-DSI panel driver with BPF init sequences Maxime Ripard
2026-09-28 16:22 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/panel: dsi-bpf: Add BPF program build infrastructure and helper header Maxime Ripard
2026-09-28 16:22 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/panel: dsi-bpf: Add Raspberry Pi 7-inch panel BPF program Maxime Ripard
2026-09-28 16:22 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/panel: dsi-bpf: Add Raspberry Pi 5-inch " Maxime Ripard
2026-09-28 16:22 ` [PATCH DO NOT MERGE 6/6] arm64: dts: broadcom: Add Raspberry Pi ILI9881C DSI panel overlays Maxime Ripard
2026-09-28 16:37 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2026-09-28 17:31 ` [PATCH 0/6] drm/bridge: Add a BPF-based MIPI-DSI panel driver Benjamin Tissoires
2026-09-28 18:12 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-09-29 6:54 ` Maxime Ripard
2026-09-28 16:39 ` Neil Armstrong
2026-09-28 17:24 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2026-09-28 19:20 ` Neil Armstrong
2026-09-28 19:48 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2026-09-28 20:36 ` Neil Armstrong
2026-09-29 7:41 ` Maxime Ripard
2026-09-29 7:55 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2026-09-29 7:27 ` Maxime Ripard
2026-09-29 7:13 ` Maxime Ripard
2026-09-29 7:46 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2026-09-29 9:03 ` Jani Nikula
2026-09-29 9:32 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2026-09-29 10:16 ` Jani Nikula
2026-09-29 12:28 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260928163711.GA210522@killaraus.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=aesteve@redhat.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=bentiss@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=jesszhan0024@gmail.com \
--cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®