mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kuba Piecuch <jpiecuch@google.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
	Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
	 Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: Kuba Piecuch <jpiecuch@google.com>,
	Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
	sched-ext@lists.linux.dev,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.3-fixes] sched_ext: Fix missing ops.dequeue() on remote local DSQ moves
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 16:17:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929161730.185271-1-jpiecuch@google.com> (raw)

Hi,

Since ebf1ccff79c4 ("sched_ext: Fix ops.dequeue() semantics"), every task
entering the BPF scheduler's custody gets exactly one ops.dequeue() when
it leaves it. A dispatch to a terminal DSQ ends custody with a flag-less
ops.dequeue() at insertion time.

That doesn't happen when the task is moved to the local DSQ of a CPU other
than the one whose rq it's on (SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON dispatch,
scx_bpf_dsq_move_to_local(), scx_bpf_dsq_move*()).
move_remote_task_to_local_dsq() sets p->scx.sticky_cpu to mark the
internal migration, but enqueue_task_scx() only clears it after the task
has been inserted into the destination local DSQ. task_leave_custody()
thus skips the custody exit on insertion, and the task sits on the local
DSQ with SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY still set. The BPF scheduler is only told
later, either:

 - when the task is picked, via ops.dequeue(SCX_DEQ_CORE_SCHED_EXEC) from
   set_next_task_scx(), even though core scheduling isn't involved, or

 - on a property change while the task waits on the local DSQ, via
   ops.dequeue(SCX_DEQ_SCHED_CHANGE) for a task already out of custody.

The existing dequeue selftest doesn't notice because it treats the late
SCX_DEQ_CORE_SCHED_EXEC dequeue like a regular dispatch dequeue, and it
still arrives before ops.running().

Patch 1 adds a dequeue_remote selftest that makes remote moves the common
case and fails on a SCX_DEQ_CORE_SCHED_EXEC dequeue, on a task running
without a preceding ops.dequeue(), or on unbalanced ops.enqueue() /
ops.dequeue() calls. Since core scheduling can legitimately pick tasks
straight out of custody, the test is skipped if any task has a core
scheduling cookie when it starts. It isn't added to auto-test-targets
since it fails on the current tree. Patch 2 fixes the bug by clearing
p->scx.sticky_cpu before scx_do_enqueue_task(). Patch 3 enables the test.

This is based on sched_ext/for-7.3-fixes (94480606a677) and also applies
cleanly to sched_ext/for-next. Testing was done on x86_64 in virtme-ng
with 4 vCPUs in an SMT topology (2 cores x 2 threads) and
CONFIG_SCHED_CORE=y, with no core scheduling cookies in use.

Without patch 2, dequeue_remote fails in every run (30/30), within the
first few custody enqueues after the scheduler is loaded:

  sched_ext: dequeue_remote: dequeue_remote.bpf.c:143: 156 (runner): late ops.dequeue() with SCX_DEQ_CORE_SCHED_EXEC (enq_cpu=1 cpu=3 seq=1)
     ...
     ops_dequeue+0x114/0x170
     set_next_task_scx+0x104/0x1e0

and the full sched_ext selftest suite reports:

  PASSED:  31
  SKIPPED: 1  (nohz_tick)
  FAILED:  1  (dequeue_remote)

With patch 2, dequeue_remote passes in every run (30/30). A typical run
does ~140k custody enqueues across both variants, each matched by exactly
one ops.dequeue(), with ~90k of them followed by the task running on a
CPU other than the one it was enqueued on. The full suite reports:

  PASSED:  32
  SKIPPED: 1  (nohz_tick)
  FAILED:  0

With a core scheduling cookie in use, dequeue_remote is skipped as
expected.

Thanks,
Kuba

Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5.5

Kuba Piecuch (3):
  selftests/sched_ext: Add a test for ops.dequeue() on remote local DSQ
    moves
  sched_ext: Call ops.dequeue() when a task arrives on a remote local
    DSQ
  selftests/sched_ext: Enable the dequeue_remote test

 kernel/sched/ext/ext.c                        |  16 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/Makefile    |   1 +
 .../selftests/sched_ext/dequeue_remote.bpf.c  | 272 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/sched_ext/dequeue_remote.c      | 243 ++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 527 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/dequeue_remote.bpf.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/dequeue_remote.c


base-commit: 94480606a677deb68d5622cf0ded88626514b3f2
-- 
2.56.0.rc1.315.gc6ed9934b7-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2026-09-29 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-29 16:17 Kuba Piecuch [this message]
2026-09-29 16:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftests/sched_ext: Add a test for " Kuba Piecuch
2026-09-29 18:42   ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-30 11:50     ` Kuba Piecuch
2026-09-29 16:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched_ext: Call ops.dequeue() when a task arrives on a remote local DSQ Kuba Piecuch
2026-09-29 18:33   ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-30 11:50     ` Kuba Piecuch
2026-09-29 16:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftests/sched_ext: Enable the dequeue_remote test Kuba Piecuch
2026-09-29 17:13 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.3-fixes] sched_ext: Fix missing ops.dequeue() on remote local DSQ moves Tejun Heo
2026-09-29 18:30   ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-30 11:50   ` Kuba Piecuch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260929161730.185271-1-jpiecuch@google.com \
    --to=jpiecuch@google.com \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®