From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Brian Masney <bmasney+clk@redhat.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet+clk@baylibre.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org, mfd@lists.linux.dev,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/20] dt-bindings: reset: add Synaptics SL261X SoCs
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 17:49:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260930-legend-helium-ca5a0ff56709@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ar0npPCHX1P5Gjzx@xhacker>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8515 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 11:15:48PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 08:44:13PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 02:14:05PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > Add device tree bindings for the resets on Synaptics SL261X SoCs.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/reset/syna,sl261x-reset.yaml | 40 ++++++++++
> > > include/dt-bindings/reset/syna,sl261x-reset.h | 80 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 120 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/syna,sl261x-reset.yaml
> > > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/syna,sl261x-reset.h
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/syna,sl261x-reset.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/syna,sl261x-reset.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..8cfec17df800
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/syna,sl261x-reset.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > +# Copyright (C) 2026 Synaptics Incorporated
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/reset/syna,sl261x-reset.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: Synaptics SL261X reset controller
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > + - Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
> > > +
> > > +description: The reset controller node must be a sub-node of the chip
> > > + controller node on SL261X SoCs.
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > + compatible:
> > > + enum:
> > > + - syna,sl261x-soc-reset
> > > + - syna,sl261x-system-reset
> > > +
> > > + "#reset-cells":
> > > + const: 1
> > > +
> > > +required:
> > > + - compatible
> > > + - "#reset-cells"
> > > +
> > > +additionalProperties: false
> > > +
> > > +examples:
> > > + - |
> > > + chip: chip-control@f7e10000 {
> > > + reg = <0xf7e10000 0x1000>;
> > > +
> > > + chip_rst: reset {
> > > + compatible = "syna,sl261x-soc-reset";
> > > + #reset-cells = <1>;
> > > + };
> >
> > Why can't this just be part of the parent node?
>
> Good question! IMHO, the reasons are:
>
> 1. the so called Gbls(Gbl means global) such as mcuGbl and
> chip control Gbl contain not only reset, pinctrl and clk/plls
> but also some other registers for different purposes, e.g in the
> chip control gbl, there are some registers to control eth phy sel(RMII
> or RGMII), and TXC 90 degree selection etc. These registers will
> be used by the Ethernet driver;
>
> While there's no pinctrl regs in avioGbl and vppGbl. In the vppgbl,
> there are some registers for DPHYTX etc.
>
> As can been, in different Gbls, there maybe different purposes registers, no
> obvious patterns.
>
> So the question here is why not split the gbl into different register
> spaces, and abstract each space for each function group?
No, you misunderstood. I'm not asking for the register space to be
split, I am asking why you cannot do
| syscon@f7e1000 {
| compatible = "syna,sl2610-soc-syscon", "syscon";
| reg = <0xf7e10000 0x1000>;
| #clock-cells = <1>;
| #reset-cells = <1>;
| };
With this kind of thing, you can either use the auxiliary bus or
MFD_CELL_NAME() to create the other devices. The latter is good if
you've got a region with clocks that also has resets thrown in, the
former is probably better if you have a syscon with a genuine
assortment of different functions that you're going to be looking up via
phandle.
> Two blocking
> points make this impossible and ugly: different reg space may not be
> aligned at 4KB boundary, e.g reset: 0x350 ~ 0x37c; eth phy sel:0xa18;
> some registers which belong to similar functionality, e.g clks, may not be
> adjacent.
This sort of thing, with non-adjacent clocks is still possible, you have
a regmap just like before.
> So the best way is to abstract these GBLs via. "syscon", "simple-mfd", and
> put necessary subnodes such as reset, pinctrl and clks under the GBL
> node. If the registers in GBL is misc control, pass the syscon phandle
> to the main driver, e.g I planed to pass the syscon phandle to GMAC
> driver to control the RMII/RGMII selection.
And you can get the regmap from other drivers by doing phandle or
compatible based lookups just like before.
>
> 2.follow current bg2 and bg2q style
> e.g arch/arm/boot/dts/synaptics/berlin2q.dtsi
>
> IMHO, why bg2 and bg2q dtsi files are implemented as current
> style is due to the above point 1.
Unfortunately, this is the berlin2q devicetree showing its age, we've
been pushing people away from nodes that exist just to probe a driver
and don't provide any additional value. Something like
| chip-control@f7e10000 {
| reg = <0xf7e10000 0x1000>;
|
| chip_rst: reset {
| compatible = "syna,sl261x-soc-reset";
| #reset-cells = <1>;
| };
|
| chip_clk: clock {
| compatible = "syna,sl261x-soc-clock";
| #clock-cells = <1>;
| };
is exactly the pattern we are trying to avoid.
Cheers,
Conor.
>
> Kindly let me know if there's a better solution.
>
> > From a quick check of the dts, the node with this subnode didn't also
> > have a system-reset node too, so there's no conflict or anything of that
> > nature.
> >
> > > + };
> > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/reset/syna,sl261x-reset.h b/include/dt-bindings/reset/syna,sl261x-reset.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..7034f58aae5b
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/reset/syna,sl261x-reset.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT) */
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright (C) 2026 Synaptics Incorporated
> > > + *
> > > + * Author: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_SL261X_RESET_H
> > > +#define _DT_BINDINGS_SL261X_RESET_H
> > > +
> > > +/* ACPU subsystem */
> > > +#define RST_SOC_SDIO0 0
> > > +#define RST_SOC_USB0 1
> > > +#define RST_SOC_EMMC 2
> > > +#define RST_SOC_GETH0 3
> > > +#define RST_SOC_SDIO1 4
> > > +#define RST_SOC_USB1 5
> > > +#define RST_SOC_GETH1 6
> > > +#define RST_SOC_USB0PHY 7
> > > +#define RST_SOC_USB0CORE 8
> > > +#define RST_SOC_USB0MAHB 9
> > > +#define RST_SOC_USB1PHY 10
> > > +#define RST_SOC_USB1CORE 11
> > > +#define RST_SOC_USB1MAHB 12
> > > +#define RST_SOC_UART0 13
> > > +#define RST_SOC_UART1 14
> > > +#define RST_SOC_UART2 15
> > > +#define RST_SOC_UART3 16
> > > +#define RST_SOC_I2C0 17
> > > +#define RST_SOC_I2C1 18
> > > +#define RST_SOC_SPI0 19
> > > +#define RST_SOC_SPI1 20
> > > +#define RST_SOC_SPI2 21
> > > +#define RST_SOC_SPI3 22
> > > +#define RST_SOC_APBTIMERS 23
> > > +#define RST_SOC_APBSYSCNT 24
> > > +#define RST_SOC_APBWDT 25
> > > +#define RST_SOC_APBGPIO 26
> > > +#define RST_SOC_APBDMA 27
> > > +#define RST_SOC_GPUCORE 28
> > > +#define RST_SOC_NPUCORE 29
> > > +#define RST_SOC_AVIOAIOG 30
> > > +#define RST_SOC_AVIOVPPG 31
> > > +#define RST_SOC_AVIOVIPG 32
> > > +
> > > +/* system subsystem */
> > > +#define RST_SM_ADCCORE 0
> > > +#define RST_SM_ADCPRST 1
> > > +#define RST_SM_CAN0PRST 2
> > > +#define RST_SM_CAN0SRST 3
> > > +#define RST_SM_CAN1PRST 4
> > > +#define RST_SM_CAN1SRST 5
> > > +#define RST_SM_GPIOPRST 6
> > > +#define RST_SM_GPIOSRST 7
> > > +#define RST_SM_I2CM0PRST 8
> > > +#define RST_SM_I2CM0SRST 9
> > > +#define RST_SM_I2CM1PRST 10
> > > +#define RST_SM_I2CM1SRST 11
> > > +#define RST_SM_I3CPRST 12
> > > +#define RST_SM_I3CSRST 13
> > > +#define RST_SM_PDMPRST 14
> > > +#define RST_SM_PDMSRST 15
> > > +#define RST_SM_PVTHSRST 16
> > > +#define RST_SM_PVTPRST 17
> > > +#define RST_SM_PWMPERIRST 18
> > > +#define RST_SM_PWMPRST 19
> > > +#define RST_SM_SPIMPRST 20
> > > +#define RST_SM_SPIMSRST 21
> > > +#define RST_SM_SPISPRST 22
> > > +#define RST_SM_SPISSRST 23
> > > +#define RST_SM_UART0PRST 24
> > > +#define RST_SM_UART0SRST 25
> > > +#define RST_SM_UART1PRST 26
> > > +#define RST_SM_UART1SRST 27
> > > +#define RST_SM_UART2PRST 28
> > > +#define RST_SM_UART2SRST 29
> > > +#define RST_SM_UART3PRST 30
> > > +#define RST_SM_UART3SRST 31
> > > +
> > > +#endif /* _DT_BINDINGS_SL261X_RESET_H */
> > > --
> > > 2.53.0
> > >
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-30 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 6:13 [PATCH 00/20] arm64: add Synaptics SL261X SoCs and RDK boards Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 6:13 ` [PATCH 01/20] dt-bindings: serial: snps-dw-apb-uart: Add Synaptics sl261x uart Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 6:13 ` [PATCH 02/20] dt-bindings: i2c: dw: Add Synaptics sl261x i2c Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 20:57 ` Andi Shyti
2026-09-29 6:14 ` [PATCH 03/20] spi: dt-bindings: snps,dw-apb-ssi: Add Synaptics sl261x spi Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 6:14 ` [PATCH 04/20] dt-bindings: i3c: dw: support up to two reset lines Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 19:40 ` Conor Dooley
2026-09-29 6:14 ` [PATCH 05/20] i3c: dw: switch to array-based exclusive reset control Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 15:01 ` Frank Li
2026-09-29 6:14 ` [PATCH 06/20] dt-bindings: i3c: Add Synaptics sl261x i3c Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 6:14 ` [PATCH 07/20] arm64: kconfig: let ARCH_BERLIN cover Synaptics arm64 SoCs Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 6:14 ` [PATCH 08/20] dt-bindings: reset: add Synaptics SL261X SoCs Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 19:44 ` Conor Dooley
2026-09-30 15:15 ` Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-30 16:49 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2026-09-29 6:14 ` [PATCH 09/20] reset: add Synaptics SL261x reset support Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 6:14 ` [PATCH 10/20] pinctrl: berlin: use u16 instead of u8 for the offset Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 6:14 ` [PATCH 11/20] pinctrl: berlin: enable module build support Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 6:14 ` [PATCH 12/20] pinctrl: berlin: add optional pinconf support Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 6:14 ` [PATCH 13/20] dt-bindings: pinctrl: berlin: Support Synaptics SL261X SoCs Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 6:14 ` [PATCH 14/20] pinctrl: berlin: support " Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 15:34 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-09-29 6:14 ` [PATCH 15/20] dt-bindings: clock: add Synaptics SL261X clock Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 19:46 ` Conor Dooley
2026-09-29 20:49 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-09-30 14:18 ` Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 6:14 ` [PATCH 16/20] clk: berlin: add Synaptics SL261X SoC clocks and plls Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 6:14 ` [PATCH 17/20] dt-bindings: mfd: Add Synaptics SL261x global block binding Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 19:55 ` Conor Dooley
2026-09-29 6:14 ` [PATCH 18/20] regulator: dt-bindings: sy8827n: support standard properties Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 19:40 ` Conor Dooley
2026-09-29 6:14 ` [PATCH 19/20] dt-bindings: arm: berlin: Add Synaptics SL261X SoC and RDK board Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 6:14 ` [PATCH 20/20] arm64: dts: synaptics: " Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-29 19:38 ` [PATCH 00/20] arm64: add Synaptics SL261X SoCs and RDK boards Conor Dooley
2026-09-30 14:15 ` Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-30 14:32 ` Jisheng Zhang
2026-09-30 16:35 ` Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260930-legend-helium-ca5a0ff56709@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=bmasney+clk@redhat.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jbrunet+clk@baylibre.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfd@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®