From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
"Tim Chen" <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
<loongarch@lists.linux.dev>, <driver-core@lists.linux.dev>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 02/13] drivers/base/arch_topology: Add support for initializing sbm topology
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 19:28:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001192849.74788-3-kprateek.nayak@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001192849.74788-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Add (fragile) support for initializing sparsebitmap topology for
architectures that support GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY.
Similar to setting cpu_smt_set_num_threads(), count the number of unique
LLCs (if last_level_cache_is_valid() true, otherwise) / packages, and
the maximum threads that exist in those instance and set
sbm_set_proc_config().
Any failure on the path will default to considering the entire processor
as a single sbm domain and the default logic will divide the system into
BITS_PER_LONG chunks. In case of a failure, sbm core will skip using
arch_sbm_cpu_instance_id() and assume all CPUs belong to the same
instance with the same instance id.
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
---
drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 121 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
index 8c5e47c28d9a..f55745a93298 100644
--- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/sbm.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/units.h>
@@ -930,6 +931,114 @@ __weak int __init parse_acpi_topology(void)
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * Note: arch_sbm_cpu_instance_id() is only used if init_sbm_topology()
+ * below succeeds at setting the sbm topology. Either the LLC
+ * information is valid or package_id is dependable.
+ */
+int arch_sbm_cpu_instance_id(int cpu)
+{
+ if (last_level_cache_is_valid(cpu)) {
+ struct cacheinfo *llc_info = get_cpu_cacheinfo_llc(cpu);
+
+ if (!llc_info)
+ goto out;
+
+ if (llc_info->attributes & CACHE_ID)
+ return llc_info->id;
+
+ /*
+ * XXX: fw_token be truncated from cast
+ * when the value is returned as an int.
+ */
+ return (int)((long)llc_info->fw_token);
+ }
+out:
+ return cpu_topology[cpu].package_id;
+}
+
+static void __init init_sbm_topology(void)
+{
+ int num_sbm_instances = 0, max_threads_per_instance = -1;
+ bool has_cache = false, has_package = false;
+ cpumask_var_t unique_cpus;
+ struct xarray instances;
+ unsigned long cpu, *count;
+
+ /*
+ * If the allocation fails, the sbm core will use
+ * the default logic of splitting CPUs evenly in
+ * BITS_PER_LONG chunk.
+ */
+ if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&unique_cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
+ return;
+
+ xa_init(&instances);
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ bool found = false;
+ int unique_cpu;
+
+ for_each_cpu(unique_cpu, unique_cpus) {
+ /*
+ * XXX: Assumes last_level_cache_is_valid() is uniformly true
+ * across the entire system if it is true for one CPU.
+ */
+ if (last_level_cache_is_valid(cpu)) {
+ has_cache = true;
+ if (last_level_cache_is_shared(cpu, unique_cpu)) {
+ found = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ } else {
+ /* Go by package_id if no LLC information is found. */
+ has_package = true;
+ if (cpu_topology[unique_cpu].package_id ==
+ cpu_topology[cpu].package_id) {
+ found = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* XXX: CPUs should not suddenly switch IDs mid way. */
+ if (has_cache && has_package)
+ goto out;
+
+ if (!found) {
+ count = kzalloc_obj(*count);
+ if (!count)
+ goto out;
+
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, unique_cpus);
+ *count += 1;
+
+ xa_store(&instances, cpu, count, GFP_KERNEL);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ count = xa_load(&instances, unique_cpu);
+ if (!count)
+ goto out;
+
+ *count += 1;
+ }
+
+ xa_for_each(&instances, cpu, count) {
+ max_threads_per_instance = max_t(int, max_threads_per_instance, *count);
+ num_sbm_instances++;
+ }
+
+ sbm_set_topology(num_sbm_instances, max_threads_per_instance);
+out:
+ xa_for_each(&instances, cpu, count) {
+ xa_erase(&instances, cpu);
+ kfree(count);
+ }
+ xa_destroy(&instances);
+ free_cpumask_var(unique_cpus);
+}
+
void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
{
int cpu, ret;
@@ -954,8 +1063,19 @@ void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
continue;
else if (ret != -ENOENT)
pr_err("Early cacheinfo failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
- return;
+ break;
}
+
+ /*
+ * If fetch_cache_info() fails for first CPU,
+ * init_cpu_sbm_topology() will use pacakge_id instead.
+ *
+ * Uniform cache topology is a necessary since implementation
+ * assumes last_level_cache_is_valid() gives same result for
+ * all possible CPUs
+ */
+ if (!ret || (cpu == 0 && ret == -ENOENT))
+ init_sbm_topology();
}
void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 19:28 [RFC PATCH v3 00/13] lib, sched: Introduce sparsebitmap (sbm) K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/13] lib/sbm: Introduce helpers for architectures to configure LLC properties K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/13] LoongArch: Initialize CPU _PXM relation for disabled CPUs from SRAT K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/13] LoongArch: Configure sbm topology during SMP preparation K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/13] MIPS: Initialize sbm topology on multi-node systems K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/13] powerpc/setup: Initialize sbm topology based on coregroup / NUMA topology K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/13] s390/topology: Initialize sbm topology during topology_init_early() K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/13] sparc64: Initialize sbm topology on multi-LLC system K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/13] x86/cpu/topology: Initialize sbm topology after topology parsing K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-03 8:27 ` Chen Yu
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/13] lib/sbm: Dynamically allocate sbm index when CPU is activated K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/13] lib/sbm: Add helpers to allocate, set, clear, and traverse the bits on sbm K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/13] sched/fair: Allocate nohz.idle_cpus_mask during sched_init_smp() K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/13] sched/fair: Switch nohz.idle_cpus to use sbm K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-03 9:10 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/13] lib, sched: Introduce sparsebitmap (sbm) Chen Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261001192849.74788-3-kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®