Re: [PATCH 1/2] agents: add infrastructure for agent resources

[Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Fri, Oct 09, 2026 at 07:36:17PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > Hm... What do you think Konstantin?
> > > 
> > > I remember the workflows@ list was originally created to share our
> > > secret/magical workflows, and I'm not sure that this one qualifies. We can
> > > start a new list too if it's easier.
> > 
> > Eh. At this point I'm trying to shove everyone towards "just use dfn: queries
> > for your stuff, stop relying on actual 'lists'". I'd just leave it as
> > linux-kernel@vger, honestly, since the automated patch churn may annoy those
> > people on the workflows list that we actually want to keep there.
> 
> Konstantin,
> 
> The "Documentation Process" entry already points to the workflow@ mailing list.
> Changes proposed in "AGENT RESOURCES" will affect everyone, so sending such
> important patches to LKML (/dev/null) does not seem right to me.

Ah, sorry, I hadn't actually realized that it already has F: entries in
MAINTAINERS. Then my observation is really moot and if you think workflows
makes more sense, especially with linux-kernel being a firehose where everyone
is just going to miss any patches, then let's use workflows@.

-K