From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: "Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>,
Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH-next v2 3/6] cgroup/cpuset: Do housekeeping check before converting invalid partition to valid
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 18:19:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261010221938.243859-4-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261010221938.243859-1-longman@redhat.com>
When a hotplug event happens or when update_cpumasks_hier() is called, an
invalid partition may be converted back to valid. However check against
housekeeping conflict isn't being done which can lead to a partition
state that violates the housekeeping rules. Update the code to allow
reviving an invalid partition only if it can pass the housekeeping check.
Fixes: 4a74e418881f ("cgroup/cpuset: Check partition conflict with housekeeping setup")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 1c0441fa3bea..fb41cd76add6 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -1374,6 +1374,13 @@ static bool prstate_housekeeping_conflict(int new_prs, int parent_prs,
cpumask_var_t full_hk_cpus;
int res;
+ /*
+ * For a currently invalid partition state, do the check assuming that
+ * it may be converted back to valid.
+ */
+ if (new_prs < 0)
+ new_prs = -new_prs;
+
if (housekeeping_enabled(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN_BOOT) && (new_prs == PRS_ROOT) &&
!cpumask_subset(add_cpus, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN_BOOT)))
return true;
@@ -1956,9 +1963,16 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
bool exclusive = true;
/*
- * Convert invalid partition to valid has to
- * pass the cpu exclusivity test.
+ * Convert invalid partition to valid has to pass the
+ * cpu exclusivity test as well as the housekeeping
+ * check.
*/
+ if (prstate_housekeeping_conflict(cs->partition_root_state,
+ parent->partition_root_state,
+ xcpus, NULL)) {
+ part_error = PERR_HKEEPING;
+ goto write_error;
+ }
rcu_read_lock();
cpuset_for_each_child(child, css, parent) {
if (child == cs)
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-10 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-10 22:19 [PATCH-next v2 0/6] cgroup/cpuset: Fix various housekeeping check problems Waiman Long
2026-10-10 22:19 ` [PATCH-next v2 1/6] cgroup/cpuset: Consolidate isolated_cpus_can_update() into prstate_housekeeping_conflict() Waiman Long
2026-10-11 2:02 ` Ridong Chen
2026-10-11 5:49 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-10 22:19 ` [PATCH-next v2 2/6] cgroup/cpuset: Consider all the exclusive CPUs when doing housekeeping check Waiman Long
2026-10-11 8:34 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-10 22:19 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2026-10-11 2:06 ` [PATCH-next v2 3/6] cgroup/cpuset: Do housekeeping check before converting invalid partition to valid Ridong Chen
2026-10-11 6:04 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-10 22:19 ` [PATCH-next v2 4/6] cgroup/cpuset: Properly disabling partition when partition state switching fails Waiman Long
2026-10-11 6:05 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-10 22:19 ` [PATCH-next v2 5/6] selftests/cgroup: Add tests for housekeeping check Waiman Long
2026-10-11 8:48 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-10 22:19 ` [PATCH-next v2 6/6] selftests/cgroup: Skip test_cpuset_prs.sh test if some required CPUs are offline Waiman Long
2026-10-11 9:00 ` Guopeng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261010221938.243859-4-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=benquike@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®