mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
To: "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
	"Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next v2 6/6] selftests/cgroup: Skip test_cpuset_prs.sh test if some required CPUs are offline
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 17:00:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <27675c88-061c-4f84-9387-324071a16b45@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261010221938.243859-7-longman@redhat.com>



在 2026/10/11 06:19, Waiman Long 写道:
> The test_cpuset_prs.sh test assumes that all the relevant CPUs being
> tested are online. If some of them are offline, some of the test cases
> may fail. So skip the test if the required CPUs are either offline or
> not present.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
>  .../selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh       | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> index 3d392e8c66aa..f57971ebb90e 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> @@ -118,6 +118,26 @@ TEST_ISOLCPUS=
>  		skip_test "Current isolated CPUs ($CURRENT_ISOLCPUS) don't match boot isolated CPUs!"
>  }
>  
> +#
> +# This test assumes that all the relevant CPUs being tested are online.
> +# If some of them are offline, some of the tests may fail. So we are going to
> +# skip running this test script if some of the required CPUs may be offline.
> +# The required CPUs include CPUs 0-7 and the first boot time isolated CPU if
> +# present. However the check below is not exhaustive and can be a false
> +# positive, but users should not run this test if some CPUs are offline.
> +#
> +ONLINE_CPUS=$(cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/online | sed -e "s/,.*//")
> +ONLINE_FIRST=$(echo $ONLINE_CPUS | sed -e "s/-.*//")
> +ONLINE_LAST=$(echo $ONLINE_CPUS | sed -e "s/.*-//")
> +if [[ -n "$FIRST_ISOLCPUS" ]]
> +then
> +	LAST_REQUIRED_CPU=$FIRST_ISOLCPUS
> +else
> +	LAST_REQUIRED_CPU=7
> +fi
> +[[ $ONLINE_FIRST != 0 || $ONLINE_LAST -lt $LAST_REQUIRED_CPU ]] &&
> +	skip_test "Some of the required CPUs are offline or not present!"
> +

Could this check run before the setup that creates the test cgroup and
changes sched/verbose?

skip_test() exits directly, and the cleanup trap hasn't been installed
here. We have already created test; with -v, sched/verbose has also been
set to Y. This exit leaves the cgroup behind and bypasses restoring
verbose.

Thanks,
Guopeng
>  cleanup()
>  {
>  	online_cpus


      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-11  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-10 22:19 [PATCH-next v2 0/6] cgroup/cpuset: Fix various housekeeping check problems Waiman Long
2026-10-10 22:19 ` [PATCH-next v2 1/6] cgroup/cpuset: Consolidate isolated_cpus_can_update() into prstate_housekeeping_conflict() Waiman Long
2026-10-11  2:02   ` Ridong Chen
2026-10-11  5:49   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-10 22:19 ` [PATCH-next v2 2/6] cgroup/cpuset: Consider all the exclusive CPUs when doing housekeeping check Waiman Long
2026-10-11  8:34   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-10 22:19 ` [PATCH-next v2 3/6] cgroup/cpuset: Do housekeeping check before converting invalid partition to valid Waiman Long
2026-10-11  2:06   ` Ridong Chen
2026-10-11  6:04   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-10 22:19 ` [PATCH-next v2 4/6] cgroup/cpuset: Properly disabling partition when partition state switching fails Waiman Long
2026-10-11  6:05   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-10 22:19 ` [PATCH-next v2 5/6] selftests/cgroup: Add tests for housekeeping check Waiman Long
2026-10-11  8:48   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-10 22:19 ` [PATCH-next v2 6/6] selftests/cgroup: Skip test_cpuset_prs.sh test if some required CPUs are offline Waiman Long
2026-10-11  9:00   ` Guopeng Zhang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=27675c88-061c-4f84-9387-324071a16b45@linux.dev \
    --to=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=benquike@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®