mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
To: "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
	"Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next v2 4/6] cgroup/cpuset: Properly disabling partition when partition state switching fails
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 14:05:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe08846e-715f-4819-b08d-95ca3e20f725@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261010221938.243859-5-longman@redhat.com>



在 2026/10/11 06:19, Waiman Long 写道:
> Before commit 103b08709e8a ("cgroup/cpuset: Fail if isolated and nohz_full
> don't leave any housekeeping"), the partition state can be freely switched
> from "root" to "isolated" and vice versa. After that commit, the switch
> from "root" to "isolated" can fail if it exhausts all the housekeeping
> CPUs. Later on, the switch from "isolated" to "root" can also fail if
> some of the partition CPUs are boot-time isolated by "isolcpus".
> 
> A local or remote partition is made invalid when the switch fails.
> However there are 2 problems with the existing invalidation code.
> 
>  1) Both the subpartitions_cpus and isolated_cpus are not properly
>     updated.
>  2) In the case of remote partition with remote_partition flag set, it
>     is not cleared.
> 
> Fix this by calling the proper partition disabling function in this case.
> 
> On an x86 test system with boot option "isolcpus=10 cgroup_debug" set
> and more than 16 cores, the following commands were executed after boot.
> 
>   # cd /sys/fs/cgroup
>   # echo +cpuset > cgroup.subtree_control
>   # cat cpuset.cpus.isolated
>   10
>   # mkdir A
>   # echo 10-12 > A/cpuset.cpus
>   # echo isolated > A/cpuset.cpus.partition
>   # cat A/cpuset.cpus.partition
>   isolated
> 
> Before the patch:
> 
>   # echo root > A/cpuset.cpus.partition
>   # cat A/cpuset.cpus.partition
>   root invalid (partition config conflicts with housekeeping setup)
>   # cat cpuset.cpus.isolated .__DEBUG__.cpuset.cpus.subpartitions
>   10-12
>   10-12
> 
> After the patch:
> 
>   # echo root > A/cpuset.cpus.partition
>   # cat A/cpuset.cpus.partition
>   root invalid (partition config conflicts with housekeeping setup)
>   # cat cpuset.cpus.isolated .__DEBUG__.cpuset.cpus.subpartitions
>   10
> 
> Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7f4c57b26ad120ab30adf35653f1dd94@kernel.org/
> Fixes: 4a74e418881f ("cgroup/cpuset: Check partition conflict with housekeeping setup")
> Fixes: 103b08709e8a ("cgroup/cpuset: Fail if isolated and nohz_full don't leave any housekeeping")
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index fb41cd76add6..df1619d7a701 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -2863,6 +2863,7 @@ static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
>  	struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cs);
>  	struct tmpmasks tmpmask;
>  	bool isolcpus_updated = false;
> +	bool disable_partition = false;
>  
>  	if (old_prs == new_prs)
>  		return 0;
> @@ -2920,15 +2921,21 @@ static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
>  		 */
>  		compute_excpus(cs, tmpmask.new_cpus);
>  		if (prstate_housekeeping_conflict(new_prs, parent_prs,
> -						  tmpmask.new_cpus, NULL))
> +						  tmpmask.new_cpus, NULL)) {
> +			disable_partition = true;
>  			err = PERR_HKEEPING;
> -		else
> +		} else {
>  			isolcpus_updated = true;
> +		}
>  	} else {
>  		/*
>  		 * Switching back to member is always allowed even if it
>  		 * disables child partitions.
>  		 */
> +		disable_partition = true;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (disable_partition) {
>  		if (is_remote_partition(cs))
>  			remote_partition_disable(cs, &tmpmask);
>  		else
> @@ -2937,7 +2944,7 @@ static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * Invalidation of child partitions will be done in
> -		 * update_cpumasks_hier().
> +		 * update_cpumasks_hier() below.
>  		 */
>  	}
>  out:
> @@ -2956,8 +2963,8 @@ static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
>  		isolated_cpus_update(old_prs, new_prs, cs->effective_xcpus);
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
>  
> -	/* Force update if switching back to member & update effective_xcpus */
> -	update_cpumasks_hier(cs, &tmpmask, !new_prs);
> +	/* Force update if partition is disabled & update effective_xcpus */
> +	update_cpumasks_hier(cs, &tmpmask, disable_partition);
>  
>  	/* A newly created partition must have effective_xcpus set */
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(!old_prs && (new_prs > 0)


Reviewed-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>

Thanks,
Guopeng

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-11  6:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-10 22:19 [PATCH-next v2 0/6] cgroup/cpuset: Fix various housekeeping check problems Waiman Long
2026-10-10 22:19 ` [PATCH-next v2 1/6] cgroup/cpuset: Consolidate isolated_cpus_can_update() into prstate_housekeeping_conflict() Waiman Long
2026-10-11  2:02   ` Ridong Chen
2026-10-11  5:49   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-10 22:19 ` [PATCH-next v2 2/6] cgroup/cpuset: Consider all the exclusive CPUs when doing housekeeping check Waiman Long
2026-10-11  8:34   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-10 22:19 ` [PATCH-next v2 3/6] cgroup/cpuset: Do housekeeping check before converting invalid partition to valid Waiman Long
2026-10-11  2:06   ` Ridong Chen
2026-10-11  6:04   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-10 22:19 ` [PATCH-next v2 4/6] cgroup/cpuset: Properly disabling partition when partition state switching fails Waiman Long
2026-10-11  6:05   ` Guopeng Zhang [this message]
2026-10-10 22:19 ` [PATCH-next v2 5/6] selftests/cgroup: Add tests for housekeeping check Waiman Long
2026-10-11  8:48   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-10 22:19 ` [PATCH-next v2 6/6] selftests/cgroup: Skip test_cpuset_prs.sh test if some required CPUs are offline Waiman Long
2026-10-11  9:00   ` Guopeng Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fe08846e-715f-4819-b08d-95ca3e20f725@linux.dev \
    --to=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=benquike@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®