From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: maddy@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
peterz@infradead.org, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Cc: sshegde@linux.ibm.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, yu.c.chen@intel.com,
vineethr@linux.ibm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
srikar@linux.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/topology: Rebuild sched domains on llc_override change
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 15:50:37 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261012102037.2477378-5-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012102037.2477378-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
On changing the llc_override, rebuild the sched domains.
For the rebuild to happen, indicate it to the scheduler that
complete rebuild of the sched domains need to happen
via arch_update_cpu_topology().
With this, llc_override functionality is complete.
For example, on CPU10,
domain0/name:SMT
domain1/name:MC
domain2/name:PKG
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/powerpc/llc_override
SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY SD_SHARE_LLC SD_PREFER_SIBLING
SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_PREFER_SIBLING
SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_PREFER_SIBLING
echo mc > /sys/kernel/debug/powerpc/llc_override
SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY SD_SHARE_LLC SD_PREFER_SIBLING
SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_SHARE_LLC SD_PREFER_SIBLING
SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_PREFER_SIBLING
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
index 4b6512d25f73..6a4ee7d3b8e5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
#include <linux/clockchips.h>
#include <linux/kexec.h>
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
+#include <linux/cpuset.h>
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
@@ -1863,6 +1864,16 @@ void __noreturn arch_cpu_idle_dead(void)
#endif
+int arch_update_cpu_topology(void)
+{
+ if (READ_ONCE(llc_override_changed)) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(llc_override_changed, 0);
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static ssize_t llc_override_get(struct file *file, char __user *ubuf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
@@ -1909,10 +1920,10 @@ static ssize_t llc_override_set(struct file *file, const char __user *ubuf,
if (override != READ_ONCE(llc_override)) {
WRITE_ONCE(llc_override, override);
WRITE_ONCE(llc_override_changed, 1);
- pr_info("sched LLC override set to %s\n",
+ pr_info("sched LLC override set to %s. Rebuilding sched domains\n",
llc_override_str[override]);
- /* Will be calling rebuild sched domain in later patches */
+ rebuild_sched_domains();
}
mutex_unlock(&llc_override_mutex);
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 10:20 [PATCH 0/4] powerpc/topology: Introduce llc_override debugfs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/topology: Introduce llc_override debug knob Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-12 12:14 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-10-12 14:10 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/topology: Add docs for llc_override Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] powerpc/topology: Update mc/pkg flags based on llc_override Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-12 10:20 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-10-12 12:19 ` [PATCH 0/4] powerpc/topology: Introduce llc_override debugfs Srikar Dronamraju
2026-10-12 14:14 ` Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261012102037.2477378-5-sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®