From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: maddy@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
peterz@infradead.org, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
yu.c.chen@intel.com, vineethr@linux.ibm.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
mpe@ellerman.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/topology: Introduce llc_override debug knob
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:44:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aszPQppmUXcJER1x@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012102037.2477378-2-sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
* Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com> [2026-10-12 15:50:34]:
Hi Shrikanth,
>
> As a result, it may be enabled but has no room to operate.
> Hence provide a debugfs option one can set to try experiment their
> workload with cache aware scheduling. This also provides ways to explore
> it on system with SMT=4 to see if there are any opportunities
> to improve or uncover bugs if there is any.
>
> This does not change the hardware cache topology. It only changes the
> sched-domain level at which SD_SHARE_LLC is set.
>
> Initially start with,
> - New debugs file called llc_override. It can be set/get on
> /sys/kernel/debug/powerpc/llc_override
> - Adds parser logic for the debug knob.
>
This is a good way to allow experimenting to know if a software override of
the LLC esp given the latency numbers within hemisphere and chip.
> There is no point in setting NUMA as the LLC domain. So give option
> until pkg to experiment with.
>
> Actual flag manipulations and rebuilding sched domains are introduced
> in subsequent patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> PS: Split is deliberate. If squashing all this into one patch helps,
> let me know.
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index 6a5a5469aaae..433757511adb 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> #include <linux/pgtable.h>
> #include <linux/clockchips.h>
> #include <linux/kexec.h>
> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
>
> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
> #include <linux/atomic.h>
> @@ -1826,3 +1827,92 @@ void __noreturn arch_cpu_idle_dead(void)
> }
>
> #endif
> +
> +enum llc_override_values {
> + LLC_OVERRIDE_DISABLED,
> + LLC_OVERRIDE_SMT,
> + LLC_OVERRIDE_MC,
> + LLC_OVERRIDE_PKG,
> +};
> +
For the current experiments, would it help to keep it simple and have just
SMT and MC. I mean we can include disabled and pkg based on our experiments.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 10:20 [PATCH 0/4] powerpc/topology: Introduce llc_override debugfs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/topology: Introduce llc_override debug knob Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-12 12:14 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2026-10-12 14:10 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/topology: Add docs for llc_override Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] powerpc/topology: Update mc/pkg flags based on llc_override Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/topology: Rebuild sched domains on llc_override change Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-12 12:19 ` [PATCH 0/4] powerpc/topology: Introduce llc_override debugfs Srikar Dronamraju
2026-10-12 14:14 ` Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aszPQppmUXcJER1x@linux.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®