From: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: bsegall@google.com, christian.loehle@arm.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
kayracizmeci@gmail.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
vschneid@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/fair: remove dead code on enqueue_task_fair()
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 16:42:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261013134227.11350-1-kayracizmeci@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013115835.GI2009045@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Ah... Just a dead code removal and look what were dealing with.
But killing your own beast must be a good thing, no? Instead
of just doing nothing.
> > The dequeue()->enqueue() also lets place_entity()
> > 'double-account' the entity's (on dequeue() saved) lag, right?
> > After dequeue: curr == se, on_rq == 0 -> excl from average
> > enqueue_hierarchy(): curr == se, on_rq == 1 -> incl again
> > place_entity(): calculate placement assuming se is excl
> I'm not entirely sure I follow. With the above fix there is still only
> one place_entity(), which is after enqueue_hierarchy() and has
> ENQUEUE_QUEUED on.
> Here enqueue_hierarchy() adds the entity to h_nr_queued, and
> ENQUEUE_QUEUED tells place_entity() exactly this, so it can adjust.
I think Christian doesn't means the entity count, but the lag doble accounting?
On the case of se == curr, and on_rq == 1? Or maybe I'm missing something. Christian?
Thanks
Kayra
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 12:52 [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: reuse the ENQUEUE_DELAYED calculation in enqueue_task_fair() Kayra Cizmeci
2026-08-24 12:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: avoid recalculating curr status in place_entity() and requeue_delayed_entity() Kayra Cizmeci
2026-08-26 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] sched/fair: reduce repeated work in enqueue path Kayra Cizmeci
2026-08-26 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/fair: reuse the ENQUEUE_DELAYED calculation in enqueue_task_fair() Kayra Cizmeci
2026-08-26 10:41 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 18:44 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-07 16:05 ` [PATCH] sched/fair: Remove unused autogroup.h include Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-07 16:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/fair: reuse the ENQUEUE_DELAYED calculation in enqueue_task_fair() Kayra Cizmeci
2026-08-26 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/fair: avoid recalculating curr status in place_entity() and requeue_delayed_entity() Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-11 10:57 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-11 12:19 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-11 13:10 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-11 12:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-11 14:08 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-11 16:02 ` [PATCH v3] sched/fair: remove dead code on enqueue_task_fair() Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-12 12:58 ` Christian Loehle
2026-10-12 13:33 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-12 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-12 14:15 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-12 14:59 ` Christian Loehle
2026-10-13 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-13 13:42 ` Kayra Cizmeci [this message]
2026-10-13 19:56 ` Christian Loehle
2026-10-15 7:42 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-15 7:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261013134227.11350-1-kayracizmeci@gmail.com \
--to=kayracizmeci@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®