mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: o.rempel@pengutronix.de, kory.maincent@bootlin.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, piotr.kubik@adtran.com,
	saikrishnag@marvell.com, horms@kernel.org, kyle.swenson@est.tech,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 04/10] net: pse-pd: do not reach a freed PHY from the notification worker
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 21:56:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261019195619.307990-1-github@szelinsky.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179239987207.3135.17141454695480717442@kernel.org>

On Mon, 19 Oct 2026 08:51:12 +0000, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote:
> [Severity: Low]
> Could the comment say that it relies on attached_phydev being cleared in
> the shared-PI case?

Yes. I will add that to the comment in the next version.

> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue and was not introduced by this patch. This
> patch relies on the pse_control_put() in phy_device_remove(). Does that
> call leave phydev->psec dangling?

Yes, an older bug, and it is not fixed in net. The PSE notifier
series for net-next fixes it: phy_device_remove() clears phydev->psec
under pse_phy_lock(), and the ethtool PSE handlers take the same lock,
so a request that is already running ends before the handle is
dropped.

Carlo

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-19 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-18  8:23 [PATCH net 00/10] net: pse-pd: assorted lifetime and error-path fixes Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-18  8:23 ` [PATCH net 01/10] net: pse-pd: size the notification kfifo after defaulting nr_lines Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19  9:22   ` Kory Maincent
2026-10-18  8:23 ` [PATCH net 02/10] net: pse-pd: fix module refcount leak in pse_control_get_internal() Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19  8:51   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-19 19:56     ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19  9:31   ` Kory Maincent
2026-10-19 19:56     ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-18  8:23 ` [PATCH net 03/10] net: pse-pd: do not keep a failed IRQ in pcdev->irq Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19  9:33   ` Kory Maincent
2026-10-18  8:23 ` [PATCH net 04/10] net: pse-pd: do not reach a freed PHY from the notification worker Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19  8:51   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-19 19:56     ` Carlo Szelinsky [this message]
2026-10-18  8:23 ` [PATCH net 05/10] net: pse-pd: check the PI state under the lock when setting a power limit Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19  8:51   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-19 12:30     ` Kory Maincent
2026-10-19 19:56       ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19 19:56     ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-18  8:23 ` [PATCH net 06/10] net: pse-pd: do not tie a shared power domain to its creator's devres Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19  8:51   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-19 19:56     ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-18  8:23 ` [PATCH net 07/10] net: pse-pd: pd692x0: release the manager power budget through devres Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19 12:45   ` Kory Maincent
2026-10-18  8:23 ` [PATCH net 08/10] net: pse-pd: pd692x0: defer probe while a manager supply is unresolved Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19 12:47   ` Kory Maincent
2026-10-18  8:23 ` [PATCH net 09/10] net: pse-pd: si3474: fix use-after-free in ancillary client error path Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19 12:50   ` Kory Maincent
2026-10-19 19:56     ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-18  8:23 ` [PATCH net 10/10] net: pse-pd: reject a power limit whose current does not fit an int Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19 12:53   ` Kory Maincent
2026-10-19 19:56     ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-18 23:32 ` [PATCH net 00/10] net: pse-pd: assorted lifetime and error-path fixes Ross Cawston
2026-10-19 19:56   ` Carlo Szelinsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261019195619.307990-1-github@szelinsky.de \
    --to=github@szelinsky.de \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kyle.swenson@est.tech \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=piotr.kubik@adtran.com \
    --cc=saikrishnag@marvell.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®