From: Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: o.rempel@pengutronix.de, kory.maincent@bootlin.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, piotr.kubik@adtran.com,
saikrishnag@marvell.com, horms@kernel.org, kyle.swenson@est.tech,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 06/10] net: pse-pd: do not tie a shared power domain to its creator's devres
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 21:56:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261019195625.308047-1-github@szelinsky.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179239987471.3135.11859262024217714390@kernel.org>
On Mon, 19 Oct 2026 08:51:14 +0000, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote:
> [Severity: High]
> Is the shared domain still tied to its creator through this supply handle?
Yes. That is an older bug, and the cover letter lists it as not fixed
here. It needs a supply handle whose consumer device the creator does
not own. I will look at that as a follow-up.
> [Severity: Medium]
> What happens to the PIs handled before the failing one?
Right, this patch alone does not undo them. "net: pse-pd: unwind
allocations when controller registration fails" does: it undoes them
inside pse_register_pw_ds(), while it holds pse_pw_d_mutex. That patch
moves to this series in the next version.
> [Severity: Medium]
> Can the PI regulator ops still run here and see pw_d == NULL?
Yes, in the short window before the PI array is freed. That is the
same older bug as the freed PI array. I will rework the second patch
of [1] and fold it into this series: it stops the PI regulator ops at
the start of unregister, before this flush.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260813200653.980170-1-github@szelinsky.de/
Carlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-19 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-18 8:23 [PATCH net 00/10] net: pse-pd: assorted lifetime and error-path fixes Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-18 8:23 ` [PATCH net 01/10] net: pse-pd: size the notification kfifo after defaulting nr_lines Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19 9:22 ` Kory Maincent
2026-10-18 8:23 ` [PATCH net 02/10] net: pse-pd: fix module refcount leak in pse_control_get_internal() Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19 8:51 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-19 19:56 ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19 9:31 ` Kory Maincent
2026-10-19 19:56 ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-18 8:23 ` [PATCH net 03/10] net: pse-pd: do not keep a failed IRQ in pcdev->irq Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19 9:33 ` Kory Maincent
2026-10-18 8:23 ` [PATCH net 04/10] net: pse-pd: do not reach a freed PHY from the notification worker Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19 8:51 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-19 19:56 ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-18 8:23 ` [PATCH net 05/10] net: pse-pd: check the PI state under the lock when setting a power limit Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19 8:51 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-19 12:30 ` Kory Maincent
2026-10-19 19:56 ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-20 5:40 ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-10-20 10:19 ` Kory Maincent
2026-10-19 19:56 ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-18 8:23 ` [PATCH net 06/10] net: pse-pd: do not tie a shared power domain to its creator's devres Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19 8:51 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-19 19:56 ` Carlo Szelinsky [this message]
2026-10-18 8:23 ` [PATCH net 07/10] net: pse-pd: pd692x0: release the manager power budget through devres Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19 12:45 ` Kory Maincent
2026-10-18 8:23 ` [PATCH net 08/10] net: pse-pd: pd692x0: defer probe while a manager supply is unresolved Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19 12:47 ` Kory Maincent
2026-10-18 8:23 ` [PATCH net 09/10] net: pse-pd: si3474: fix use-after-free in ancillary client error path Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19 12:50 ` Kory Maincent
2026-10-19 19:56 ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-18 8:23 ` [PATCH net 10/10] net: pse-pd: reject a power limit whose current does not fit an int Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-19 12:53 ` Kory Maincent
2026-10-19 19:56 ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-10-18 23:32 ` [PATCH net 00/10] net: pse-pd: assorted lifetime and error-path fixes Ross Cawston
2026-10-19 19:56 ` Carlo Szelinsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261019195625.308047-1-github@szelinsky.de \
--to=github@szelinsky.de \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kyle.swenson@est.tech \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=piotr.kubik@adtran.com \
--cc=saikrishnag@marvell.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®