Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/radeon: process the VCE interrupt on SI and Trinity

[Matheus Tagliari <mptagliari@gmail.com>]

Hi Timur, Christian,

Thanks for the input, Timur.

To be clear, I'm not opposed to a backport. Fixing VCE1 for people stuck
on the radeon driver with an LTS kernel is exactly the case that made me
look into this in the first place. But my goal is only to help, and as I
said before, I do not want to push a change you don't want.

Christian, if you'd rather keep this out of stable, I'll drop the
"Cc: stable" tag in v3 and leave the decision to you. If there is a
specific concern behind it (risk of regressions on other SI/Trinity
parts, say), I'd be glad to hear it. I can also try to address it, for
example with more testing, so that a backport can be reconsidered later.

On that note, the SI part was tested on real hardware together with
patch 2, but the Trinity/Richland part only mirrors the existing CIK and
SI handling and has not been tested on hardware. If anyone has a
Trinity or Richland machine and can run a VCE encode with the series
applied, a Tested-by would help for both the review and any backport
discussion.

Either way, I'll respin v3 with whatever you both prefer.

Thanks,
Matheus