* Re: [PATCH v2] mm/vmalloc: reject overflowing vm_map_ram page counts
2026-10-23 6:43 [PATCH v2] mm/vmalloc: reject overflowing vm_map_ram page counts Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere)
@ 2026-10-30 3:55 ` Andrew Morton
2026-10-30 6:23 ` Dev Jain
2026-11-02 4:16 ` Andrew Morton
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2026-10-30 3:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere)
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki, Nicholas Piggin, Shubhang Kaushik,
Christoph Lameter (Ampere),
linux-mm, linux-kernel, stable, Dev Jain, Anshuman Khandual
On Thu, 22 Oct 2026 23:43:47 -0700 "Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere)" <sh@gentwo.org> wrote:
> vm_map_ram() accepts a page count and must either map that many pages or
> fail. It currently converts the count to a byte size with:
>
> (unsigned long)count << PAGE_SHIFT
>
> On 32-bit kernels, this conversion overflows when count is greater than
> ULONG_MAX >> PAGE_SHIFT. vm_map_ram() then allocates and maps only the
> wrapped byte size, but returns a non-NULL address to its caller.
>
> For example, with 4 KiB pages, a count of 1048577 wraps to PAGE_SIZE.
> vm_map_ram() therefore returns a mapping containing one page instead of
> the requested 1048577 pages.
>
> If a caller uses the successful result as a mapping of all requested
> pages, it can access beyond the allocated mapping. Such an access can
> fault. If the accessed virtual address is occupied by another vmalloc
> mapping, it can instead access and corrupt unrelated kernel memory. In a
> userspace-reachable call path, this can result in a failed operation, a
> kernel oops or panic, or the effects of corrupted kernel data.
>
> Return NULL before allocating or mapping anything when count * PAGE_SIZE
> cannot be represented in an unsigned long.
Thanks. Let's cc the developers who commented on the v1 patch.
> Fixes: db64fe02258f ("mm: rewrite vmap layer")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere) <sh@gentwo.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Use check_mul_overflow() to validate the page-count-to-byte conversion.
> - Describe the short-mapping failure mode and its worst-case effects.
>
> Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261022-vmalloc-reject-overflow-v1-1-5fde0042ffb9@gentwo.org
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index bea9f76ed7e74247d4ce919250c2f02dd5c36483..8a056e424a4f2c037c10f736002839014f1f57dc 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -3083,10 +3083,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_unmap_ram);
> */
> void *vm_map_ram(struct page **pages, unsigned int count, int node)
> {
> - unsigned long size = (unsigned long)count << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + unsigned long size;
> unsigned long addr;
> void *mem;
>
> + if (check_mul_overflow((unsigned long)count, PAGE_SIZE, &size))
> + return NULL;
> +
> if (likely(count <= VMAP_MAX_ALLOC)) {
> mem = vb_alloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (IS_ERR(mem))
>
> ---
> base-commit: 734bef548a96e8774d6eef5dfa2026c6edc4e80b
> change-id: 20261022-vmalloc-reject-overflow-e532c556f3fa
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere) <sh@gentwo.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] mm/vmalloc: reject overflowing vm_map_ram page counts
2026-10-23 6:43 [PATCH v2] mm/vmalloc: reject overflowing vm_map_ram page counts Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere)
2026-10-30 3:55 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2026-10-30 6:23 ` Dev Jain
2026-11-02 4:16 ` Andrew Morton
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dev Jain @ 2026-10-30 6:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere),
Andrew Morton, Uladzislau Rezki, Nicholas Piggin,
Shubhang Kaushik, Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, stable
On 23/10/26 12:13 pm, Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere) wrote:
> vm_map_ram() accepts a page count and must either map that many pages or
> fail. It currently converts the count to a byte size with:
>
> (unsigned long)count << PAGE_SHIFT
>
> On 32-bit kernels, this conversion overflows when count is greater than
> ULONG_MAX >> PAGE_SHIFT. vm_map_ram() then allocates and maps only the
> wrapped byte size, but returns a non-NULL address to its caller.
>
> For example, with 4 KiB pages, a count of 1048577 wraps to PAGE_SIZE.
> vm_map_ram() therefore returns a mapping containing one page instead of
> the requested 1048577 pages.
>
> If a caller uses the successful result as a mapping of all requested
> pages, it can access beyond the allocated mapping. Such an access can
> fault. If the accessed virtual address is occupied by another vmalloc
> mapping, it can instead access and corrupt unrelated kernel memory. In a
> userspace-reachable call path, this can result in a failed operation, a
> kernel oops or panic, or the effects of corrupted kernel data.
>
> Return NULL before allocating or mapping anything when count * PAGE_SIZE
> cannot be represented in an unsigned long.
>
> Fixes: db64fe02258f ("mm: rewrite vmap layer")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere) <sh@gentwo.org>
> ---
I don't have much knowledge about 32-bit stuff but upon some discussion with LLM
the problem seems legit, maybe just hard to reproduce. Also there are sufficient
users of vm_map_ram() to care about this:
Reviewed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> Changes in v2:
> - Use check_mul_overflow() to validate the page-count-to-byte conversion.
> - Describe the short-mapping failure mode and its worst-case effects.
>
> Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261022-vmalloc-reject-overflow-v1-1-5fde0042ffb9@gentwo.org
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index bea9f76ed7e74247d4ce919250c2f02dd5c36483..8a056e424a4f2c037c10f736002839014f1f57dc 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -3083,10 +3083,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_unmap_ram);
> */
> void *vm_map_ram(struct page **pages, unsigned int count, int node)
> {
> - unsigned long size = (unsigned long)count << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + unsigned long size;
> unsigned long addr;
> void *mem;
>
> + if (check_mul_overflow((unsigned long)count, PAGE_SIZE, &size))
> + return NULL;
> +
> if (likely(count <= VMAP_MAX_ALLOC)) {
> mem = vb_alloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (IS_ERR(mem))
>
> ---
> base-commit: 734bef548a96e8774d6eef5dfa2026c6edc4e80b
> change-id: 20261022-vmalloc-reject-overflow-e532c556f3fa
>
> Best regards,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] mm/vmalloc: reject overflowing vm_map_ram page counts
2026-10-23 6:43 [PATCH v2] mm/vmalloc: reject overflowing vm_map_ram page counts Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere)
2026-10-30 3:55 ` Andrew Morton
2026-10-30 6:23 ` Dev Jain
@ 2026-11-02 4:16 ` Andrew Morton
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2026-11-02 4:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere)
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki, Nicholas Piggin, Shubhang Kaushik,
Christoph Lameter (Ampere),
linux-mm, linux-kernel, stable
On Thu, 22 Oct 2026 23:43:47 -0700 "Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere)" <sh@gentwo.org> wrote:
> vm_map_ram() accepts a page count and must either map that many pages or
> fail. It currently converts the count to a byte size with:
>
> (unsigned long)count << PAGE_SHIFT
>
> On 32-bit kernels, this conversion overflows when count is greater than
> ULONG_MAX >> PAGE_SHIFT. vm_map_ram() then allocates and maps only the
> wrapped byte size, but returns a non-NULL address to its caller.
>
> For example, with 4 KiB pages, a count of 1048577 wraps to PAGE_SIZE.
> vm_map_ram() therefore returns a mapping containing one page instead of
> the requested 1048577 pages.
>
> If a caller uses the successful result as a mapping of all requested
> pages, it can access beyond the allocated mapping. Such an access can
> fault. If the accessed virtual address is occupied by another vmalloc
> mapping, it can instead access and corrupt unrelated kernel memory. In a
> userspace-reachable call path, this can result in a failed operation, a
> kernel oops or panic, or the effects of corrupted kernel data.
>
> Return NULL before allocating or mapping anything when count * PAGE_SIZE
> cannot be represented in an unsigned long.
Thanks.
Is there a case where userspace can actually hit this, or is it a
theoretical case which can't actually be encountered, or something else?
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -3083,10 +3083,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_unmap_ram);
> */
> void *vm_map_ram(struct page **pages, unsigned int count, int node)
> {
> - unsigned long size = (unsigned long)count << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + unsigned long size;
> unsigned long addr;
> void *mem;
>
> + if (check_mul_overflow((unsigned long)count, PAGE_SIZE, &size))
> + return NULL;
> +
> if (likely(count <= VMAP_MAX_ALLOC)) {
> mem = vb_alloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (IS_ERR(mem))
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread