* [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use rdmsrq_safe() to read MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT
@ 2026-11-04 7:01 Li Zhaoxin
2026-11-04 14:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Li Zhaoxin @ 2026-11-04 7:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Srinivas Pandruvada, Rafael J . Wysocki
Cc: Len Brown, Viresh Kumar, linux-pm, linux-kernel, Li Zhaoxin, stable
From: lizhaoxin04 <lizhaoxin04@baidu.com>
Commit ed7cad0504e3 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Relocate platform
preference check") moved the intel_pstate_platform_pwr_mgmt_exists()
call to the beginning of intel_pstate_init(), right after the vendor
check, so it now runs before "no_load" (intel_pstate=disable) and the
other checks.
MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT is model-specific and KVM does not emulate it. In a
KVM guest using a CPU model listed in intel_pstate_cpu_oob_ids[] (for
example "-cpu host" on Emerald Rapids), reading it raises #GP and the
unchecked rdmsrq() emits a warning with a call trace on every boot, even
with intel_pstate=disable:
unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x1aa at rIP: 0xffffffffa4009342 (native_read_msr+0x2/0x50)
Call Trace:
<TASK>
intel_pstate_platform_pwr_mgmt_exists+0x3b/0x220
intel_pstate_init+0x1e/0x500
do_one_initcall+0x59/0x350
...
Before that commit, such guests typically returned from
intel_pstate_init() earlier, either because of intel_pstate=disable or
because intel_pstate_msrs_not_valid() failed on the zero ratios that
KVM reports in MSR_PLATFORM_INFO by default, so the MSR was not read.
Use rdmsrq_safe() and treat a failing read as "no OOB mode". The
exception fixup already zeroes the result of a failed unchecked read,
so apart from the warning going away there is no functional change.
Fixes: ed7cad0504e3 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Relocate platform preference check")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Li Zhaoxin <lizhaoxin04@baidu.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index 0e6ae4cdda5d..67447280e86a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -3649,12 +3649,12 @@ static struct acpi_platform_list plat_info[] __initdata = {
static bool __init intel_pstate_platform_pwr_mgmt_exists(void)
{
const struct x86_cpu_id *id;
- u64 misc_pwr;
+ u64 misc_pwr = 0;
int idx;
id = x86_match_cpu(intel_pstate_cpu_oob_ids);
if (id) {
- rdmsrq(MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT, misc_pwr);
+ rdmsrq_safe(MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT, &misc_pwr);
if (misc_pwr & BITMASK_OOB) {
pr_debug("Bit 8 or 18 in the MISC_PWR_MGMT MSR set\n");
pr_debug("P states are controlled in Out of Band mode by the firmware/hardware\n");
base-commit: 6628e7d4c6b25c8d18f1345e3a20d21829aae7e4
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use rdmsrq_safe() to read MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT
2026-11-04 7:01 [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use rdmsrq_safe() to read MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT Li Zhaoxin
@ 2026-11-04 14:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) @ 2026-11-04 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li Zhaoxin
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada, Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown, Viresh Kumar,
linux-pm, linux-kernel, stable
On Wed, Nov 4, 2026 at 8:02 AM Li Zhaoxin <lizhaoxin04@baidu.com> wrote:
>
> From: lizhaoxin04 <lizhaoxin04@baidu.com>
>
> Commit ed7cad0504e3 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Relocate platform
> preference check") moved the intel_pstate_platform_pwr_mgmt_exists()
> call to the beginning of intel_pstate_init(), right after the vendor
> check, so it now runs before "no_load" (intel_pstate=disable) and the
> other checks.
>
> MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT is model-specific and KVM does not emulate it. In a
> KVM guest using a CPU model listed in intel_pstate_cpu_oob_ids[] (for
> example "-cpu host" on Emerald Rapids), reading it raises #GP and the
> unchecked rdmsrq() emits a warning with a call trace on every boot, even
> with intel_pstate=disable:
>
> unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x1aa at rIP: 0xffffffffa4009342 (native_read_msr+0x2/0x50)
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> intel_pstate_platform_pwr_mgmt_exists+0x3b/0x220
> intel_pstate_init+0x1e/0x500
> do_one_initcall+0x59/0x350
> ...
>
> Before that commit, such guests typically returned from
> intel_pstate_init() earlier, either because of intel_pstate=disable or
> because intel_pstate_msrs_not_valid() failed on the zero ratios that
> KVM reports in MSR_PLATFORM_INFO by default, so the MSR was not read.
>
> Use rdmsrq_safe() and treat a failing read as "no OOB mode". The
> exception fixup already zeroes the result of a failed unchecked read,
> so apart from the warning going away there is no functional change.
>
> Fixes: ed7cad0504e3 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Relocate platform preference check")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhaoxin <lizhaoxin04@baidu.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index 0e6ae4cdda5d..67447280e86a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -3649,12 +3649,12 @@ static struct acpi_platform_list plat_info[] __initdata = {
> static bool __init intel_pstate_platform_pwr_mgmt_exists(void)
> {
> const struct x86_cpu_id *id;
> - u64 misc_pwr;
> + u64 misc_pwr = 0;
> int idx;
>
> id = x86_match_cpu(intel_pstate_cpu_oob_ids);
> if (id) {
> - rdmsrq(MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT, misc_pwr);
> + rdmsrq_safe(MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT, &misc_pwr);
> if (misc_pwr & BITMASK_OOB) {
> pr_debug("Bit 8 or 18 in the MISC_PWR_MGMT MSR set\n");
> pr_debug("P states are controlled in Out of Band mode by the firmware/hardware\n");
>
Applied as 7.4-rc material, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-04 14:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-04 7:01 [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use rdmsrq_safe() to read MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT Li Zhaoxin
2026-11-04 14:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®