mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	"Dietmar Eggemann" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Ben Segall" <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	"K Prateek Nayak" <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	"Luca Abeni" <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
	"Mathieu Poirier" <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
	"Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	"Clark Williams" <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v2 21/21] sched/deadline: Count the bandwidth a boosted task is given
Date: Wed,  4 Nov 2026 16:12:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261104211207.1392343-22-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104211207.1392343-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>

The runqueue a sleeping deadline task is on counts the bandwidth of
that task in this_bw, which switched_to_dl() hands it as the task
enters the class. A task that priority inheritance boosted into the
class is in it already: __sched_setscheduler() neither dequeues it nor
enqueues it back, so switched_to_dl() does not run, and sched_setattr()
of SCHED_DEADLINE on such a task leaves this_bw without the bandwidth
the task now has. Its wake-up gives that bandwidth to running_bw alone:

	WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_rq->running_bw > dl_rq->this_bw);

and the two sums GRUB reclaims from disagree by the bandwidth of the
task until it migrates, where the enqueue adds it (add_rq_bw()).

Change the bandwidth the runqueue counts where the parameters change,
in __setparam_dl(), which every task that gains deadline parameters
goes through, rather than in sched_dl_overflow(), which only a task of
the class reaches that way. A runqueue that counts nothing of the task
takes the new bandwidth, where the previous patch left it to the
enqueue to come: that enqueue finds the bandwidth there and leaves it
(add_rq_bw() of a task a runqueue counts), and a task waking up has
task_cpu() pointing at the runqueue it wakes on. The bandwidth of a
special entity stays counted nowhere.

Fixes: 8fd27231c330 ("sched/deadline: Track the "total rq utilization" too")
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 15d224846eba..a3b45bb4f35e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -442,22 +442,32 @@ void cancel_inactive_timer(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
 	cancel_dl_timer(dl_se, &dl_se->inactive_timer);
 }
 
+/*
+ * The runqueue a sleeping task is on counts the bandwidth the task has:
+ * give it @new_bw in place of what it counts of the task's.
+ */
 static void dl_change_utilization(struct task_struct *p, u64 new_bw)
 {
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(p->dl.flags & SCHED_FLAG_SUGOV);
+	struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
+	struct rq *rq = task_rq(p);
 
-	if (task_on_rq_queued(p))
+	if (task_on_rq_queued(p) || dl_entity_is_special(dl_se))
 		return;
 
 	/*
-	 * Waking up on another CPU, the task has its bandwidth on no
-	 * runqueue: the enqueue to come charges the new one, with the new
-	 * parameters, which __setparam_dl() sets right after this.
+	 * No runqueue counts bandwidth of the task's: this one takes the
+	 * new one, and the enqueue to come leaves it there (add_rq_bw() of
+	 * a task a runqueue counts). A task waking up on another CPU has
+	 * none of its bandwidth on a runqueue, and task_cpu() points at the
+	 * one it wakes on.
 	 */
-	if (!p->dl.dl_bw_oncpu)
+	if (!dl_se->dl_bw_oncpu) {
+		__add_rq_bw(new_bw, &rq->dl);
+		dl_se->dl_bw_oncpu = 1;
 		return;
+	}
 
-	dl_rq_change_utilization(task_rq(p), &p->dl, new_bw);
+	dl_rq_change_utilization(rq, dl_se, new_bw);
 }
 
 static void __dl_clear_params(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se);
@@ -4217,7 +4227,6 @@ int sched_dl_overflow(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
 		if (counted)
 			__dl_sub(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpus);
 		__dl_add(dl_b, new_bw, cpus);
-		dl_change_utilization(p, new_bw);
 		err = 0;
 	} else if (!dl_policy(policy) && task_has_dl_policy(p)) {
 		/*
@@ -4266,6 +4275,18 @@ int sched_dl_overflow(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
 void __setparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr)
 {
 	struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
+	u64 period = attr->sched_period ?: attr->sched_deadline;
+
+	/*
+	 * The bandwidth of a special entity is counted on no runqueue.
+	 * The rest have theirs changed here, where their parameters are:
+	 * switched_to_dl() hands it to the runqueue of a task that enters
+	 * the class, and a task that priority inheritance boosted into the
+	 * class is in it already, so nothing dequeues it and enqueues it
+	 * back for that.
+	 */
+	if (!(attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_SUGOV))
+		dl_change_utilization(p, to_ratio(period, attr->sched_runtime));
 
 	dl_se->dl_runtime = attr->sched_runtime;
 	dl_se->dl_deadline = attr->sched_deadline;
-- 
2.47.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-04 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-04 21:11 [PATCH v2 00/21] sched/deadline: bandwidth accounting fixes and selftests Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 01/21] sched: Reject SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS before reserving deadline bandwidth Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 02/21] sched: Refuse SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS that would change the policy Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 03/21] sched/deadline: Do not admit bandwidth for parameters that are kept Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 04/21] sched/deadline: Do not divide by zero active CPUs of a root domain Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 05/21] sched/deadline: Do not BUG() on a deadline task with no active CPU allowed Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 06/21] sched/deadline: Do not lose a throttled task switched out and back Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 22:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 07/21] sched/deadline: Do not release a departing sleeper's bandwidth twice Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 22:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 08/21] selftests/sched: Add a test of SCHED_DEADLINE policy round trips Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 09/21] sched/deadline: Keep departing bandwidth across a root domain rebuild Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 22:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 10/21] selftests/sched: Test SCHED_DEADLINE " Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 11/21] sched/deadline: Do not take a waking task's bandwidth off a runqueue it left Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 12/21] sched/debug: Show the deadline bandwidth of each runqueue Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 13/21] sched/deadline: Rebuild the root domains' accounting without cpusets too Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 23:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 14/21] selftests/sched: Add a test of SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth accounting Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 15/21] sched/deadline: Record the root domain holding a task's bandwidth Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 23:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 16/21] sched/deadline: Move a task's bandwidth only where room was made Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 17/21] cgroup/cpuset: Give back the bandwidth an attach did not move Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 23:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 18/21] sched/deadline: Credit a rebuild to a CPU that can hold the bandwidth Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-05  0:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 19/21] sched: Clear cpuset_locked where the policy check retries Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 20/21] sched/deadline: Cancel the replenishment timer with the parameters Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-05  0:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2026-11-05  0:36   ` [PATCH v2 21/21] sched/deadline: Count the bandwidth a boosted task is given sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261104211207.1392343-22-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®