From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, tj@kernel.org,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/21] sched/deadline: Do not lose a throttled task switched out and back
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 22:09:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-198201@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104211207.1392343-7-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] sched/deadline: replenish_dl_entity() in dl_task_timer() skips 0-lag reset
--
commit a554b85972acb72b5ec447330ac07adc4a64ee34
Author: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
sched/deadline: Do not lose a throttled task switched out and back
This commit calls replenish_dl_entity() from dl_task_timer() when a throttled
task has switched out of SCHED_DEADLINE before the replenishment timer fires,
so that if the task switches back before its 0-lag time, it does not remain
throttled with no pending timer.
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 30a52e42c26d8..b646063a7b0d5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1232,10 +1232,23 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
>
> /*
> * The task might have changed its scheduling policy to something
> - * different than SCHED_DEADLINE (through switched_from_dl()).
> + * different than SCHED_DEADLINE (through switched_from_dl()). It
> + * keeps its parameters until its 0-lag time and may come back to
> + * SCHED_DEADLINE before then, switched_to_dl() cancelling the
> + * inactive timer: give it the replenishment this timer owes it, as
> + * the !queued case below does, and leave the enqueue to its return.
> + * A throttle left behind would never be lifted; an overrun left in
> + * its runtime would be forgiven by the new period its enqueue
> + * starts; and a yield left set would throttle it again at once.
> */
> - if (!dl_task(p))
> + if (!dl_task(p)) {
> + if (dl_se->dl_throttled && !is_dl_boosted(dl_se)) {
> + sched_clock_tick();
> + update_rq_clock(rq);
> + replenish_dl_entity(dl_se);
> + }
> goto unlock;
> + }
[Severity: High]
What happens if the task stays out of SCHED_DEADLINE past its 0-lag time, and
then switches back to SCHED_DEADLINE while runnable before the replenished
dl_se->deadline expires?
When replenish_dl_entity() runs here in dl_task_timer() at the end of the
period, it advances dl_se->deadline by one or more periods (past the 0-lag
time) and sets a positive dl_se->runtime:
kernel/sched/deadline.c:replenish_dl_entity() {
...
while (dl_se->runtime <= 0) {
dl_se->deadline += pi_of(dl_se)->dl_period;
dl_se->runtime += pi_of(dl_se)->dl_runtime;
}
...
}
If the task does not return before the 0-lag time, inactive_task_timer()
fires, subtracts the old bandwidth from dl_b, and calls __dl_clear_params():
kernel/sched/deadline.c:inactive_task_timer() {
...
raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock);
__dl_sub(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(task_cpu(p)));
raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock);
__dl_clear_params(dl_se);
...
}
However, __dl_clear_params() only zeroes the static reservation parameters and
flags; it leaves the dynamic dl_se->deadline and dl_se->runtime untouched:
kernel/sched/deadline.c:__dl_clear_params() {
dl_se->dl_runtime = 0;
dl_se->dl_deadline = 0;
dl_se->dl_period = 0;
dl_se->flags = 0;
dl_se->dl_bw = 0;
dl_se->dl_density = 0;
...
}
If the runnable task then switches back to SCHED_DEADLINE via sched_setattr()
after the 0-lag time has passed, but before the replenished dl_se->deadline,
__setparam_dl() writes the new static parameters and sched_change_end() calls
enqueue_task_dl() -> enqueue_dl_entity() with ENQUEUE_MOVE (and without
ENQUEUE_WAKEUP):
kernel/sched/deadline.c:enqueue_dl_entity() {
...
} else if ((flags & ENQUEUE_MOVE) &&
!is_dl_boosted(dl_se) &&
dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, rq_clock(rq_of_dl_se(dl_se)))) {
setup_new_dl_entity(dl_se);
}
...
}
Previously, dl_se->deadline stayed at the old deadline (which is earlier than
the 0-lag time), so dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, rq_clock(rq)) was always
true after the 0-lag time and setup_new_dl_entity() initialized a fresh period
from the new static parameters.
With dl_se->deadline pushed past the 0-lag time by replenish_dl_entity(),
won't dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, rq_clock(rq)) evaluate to false during
the window between the 0-lag time and the replenished dl_se->deadline,
skipping setup_new_dl_entity()?
If setup_new_dl_entity() is skipped after the 0-lag time has already freed the
old bandwidth and reset the reservation, the task will run with stale dynamic
dl_se->runtime and dl_se->deadline from its previous reservation. For example,
a task could re-enter SCHED_DEADLINE with a tiny new runtime reservation after
its old bandwidth was released at 0-lag, yet still consume the large
dl_se->runtime replenished from its previous reservation, or conversely remain
penalized by a previous overrun after its 0-lag time has already elapsed.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261104211207.1392343-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 21:11 [PATCH v2 00/21] sched/deadline: bandwidth accounting fixes and selftests Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 01/21] sched: Reject SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS before reserving deadline bandwidth Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 02/21] sched: Refuse SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS that would change the policy Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 03/21] sched/deadline: Do not admit bandwidth for parameters that are kept Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 04/21] sched/deadline: Do not divide by zero active CPUs of a root domain Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 05/21] sched/deadline: Do not BUG() on a deadline task with no active CPU allowed Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 06/21] sched/deadline: Do not lose a throttled task switched out and back Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 22:09 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 07/21] sched/deadline: Do not release a departing sleeper's bandwidth twice Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 22:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 08/21] selftests/sched: Add a test of SCHED_DEADLINE policy round trips Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 09/21] sched/deadline: Keep departing bandwidth across a root domain rebuild Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 22:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 10/21] selftests/sched: Test SCHED_DEADLINE " Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 11/21] sched/deadline: Do not take a waking task's bandwidth off a runqueue it left Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 12/21] sched/debug: Show the deadline bandwidth of each runqueue Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 13/21] sched/deadline: Rebuild the root domains' accounting without cpusets too Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 23:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 14/21] selftests/sched: Add a test of SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth accounting Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 15/21] sched/deadline: Record the root domain holding a task's bandwidth Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 23:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 16/21] sched/deadline: Move a task's bandwidth only where room was made Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 17/21] cgroup/cpuset: Give back the bandwidth an attach did not move Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 23:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 18/21] sched/deadline: Credit a rebuild to a CPU that can hold the bandwidth Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-05 0:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 19/21] sched: Clear cpuset_locked where the policy check retries Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 20/21] sched/deadline: Cancel the replenishment timer with the parameters Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-05 0:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 21/21] sched/deadline: Count the bandwidth a boosted task is given Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-05 0:36 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-198201@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®