From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Min Li <min.li@microchip.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
Grzegorz Nitka <grzegorz.nitka@intel.com>,
Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacinski@intel.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>, Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 10/10] dpll: document locking rules
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 13:10:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261106121005.1327603-11-ivecera@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106121005.1327603-1-ivecera@redhat.com>
Describe the lock levels of the subsystem, which domain a callback runs
under and the rules device drivers have to follow.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
---
Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c | 9 +++++++
2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
index 7c117ae37cc1bc..40d5037ff3bb0f 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
@@ -675,6 +675,50 @@ In the error path we have to rewind every allocation in the reverse order:
More complex example can be found in Intel's ICE driver or nVidia's mlx5 driver.
+Locking
+=======
+
+The subsystem uses two levels of locks, always taken in this order:
+
+- ``dpll_lock`` protects the topology of dpll devices and pins and their
+ lifetime. Functions changing the topology, for example dpll_pin_register(),
+ take it for write and send the create and delete notifications under it.
+ Netlink requests, each part of a dump and change notifications take it for
+ read for their whole duration.
+- A domain lock serializes driver callbacks. All dpll devices and pins created
+ with the same module and ``clock_id`` belong to one domain, in practice to
+ one chip or card.
+
+A netlink request addressing a device or a pin by its ID holds the domain lock
+of that object from start to end. A notification holds it while its message is
+built and sent, so messages of one object are sent in the order they were
+built. Only one domain lock is held at a time, so domains have no lock order,
+and callbacks of different domains can run concurrently.
+
+Callbacks of a dpll device run under the domain of the device. Callbacks of a
+pin run under the domain of the pin, whichever driver registered them:
+
+- A driver registering a pin of another driver with its dpll device has these
+ callbacks serialized with the driver that created the pin, not with the other
+ callbacks of its device, so it has to protect the state they share by itself.
+ A callback stuck in such a registration stops the domain of the pin.
+- The parent pin of a pin registered with dpll_pin_on_pin_register() and its
+ dpll devices can belong to another driver, so the callback must not
+ dereference their private data.
+- The frequency monitor belongs to the dpll device, so only callbacks of a pin
+ of the same domain registered with dpll_pin_register() can include
+ ``.measured_freq_get``.
+
+Device drivers have to follow these rules:
+
+- A callback must not call dpll_device_change_ntf(), dpll_pin_change_ntf() or
+ any function changing the topology.
+- A callback notifies about objects of the domain it runs under with
+ __dpll_device_change_ntf() or __dpll_pin_change_ntf(). Other objects have to
+ be notified from a context that holds no domain lock, for example a work item.
+- A driver must not call dpll_device_change_ntf(), dpll_pin_change_ntf() or any
+ function changing the topology while holding a lock that its callbacks take.
+
SyncE enablement
================
For SyncE enablement it is required to allow control over dpll device
diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
index 84377f8ba16036..6ad40fb9eee855 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
@@ -932,6 +932,10 @@ __dpll_pin_register(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin,
* @ops: ops for a dpll pin ops
* @priv: pointer to private information of owner
*
+ * The callbacks run under the domain of @pin. If @pin belongs to another domain
+ * than @dpll, they are not serialized with the callbacks of @dpll and @ops must
+ * not include .measured_freq_get.
+ *
* Context: Acquires dpll_lock and domain locks
* Return:
* * 0 on success
@@ -1049,6 +1053,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_pin_unregister);
* Register a pin with a parent pin, create references between them and
* between newly registered pin and dplls connected with a parent pin.
*
+ * The callbacks run under the domain of @pin. The parent pin and its dplls can
+ * belong to another driver, so @ops must not dereference their private data.
+ * The frequency monitor belongs to a dpll, so @ops must not include
+ * .measured_freq_get.
+ *
* Context: Acquires dpll_lock and domain locks
* Return:
* * 0 on success
--
2.56.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 12:09 [PATCH net-next 00/10] dpll: do not serialize driver callbacks under global dpll_lock Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] ice: dpll: notify TSPLL lock status from the periodic work only Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] ice: dpll: serialize changes of the SyncE CGU registers Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] dpll: add domain object Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] dpll: take domain locks around driver callbacks Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] dpll: convert dpll_lock to rwsem Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] dpll: add KUnit tests for core locking Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] dpll: reject measured_freq_get for foreign and on-pin registrations Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] dpll: zl3073x: update locking comments Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] ice: dpll: " Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:10 ` Ivan Vecera [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261106121005.1327603-11-ivecera@redhat.com \
--to=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=grzegorz.nitka@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=karol.kolacinski@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=min.li@microchip.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=poros@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®