From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Min Li <min.li@microchip.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
Grzegorz Nitka <grzegorz.nitka@intel.com>,
Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacinski@intel.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>, Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 07/10] dpll: reject measured_freq_get for foreign and on-pin registrations
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 13:10:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261106121005.1327603-8-ivecera@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106121005.1327603-1-ivecera@redhat.com>
A message about a pin with .measured_freq_get calls .freq_monitor_get of
a dpll of the pin. For a pin of another domain, this device callback
would run outside the domain of the dpll, so dpll_pin_register() now
rejects such ops.
dpll_pin_on_pin_register() checks nothing about them. The message would
call .freq_monitor_get with no NULL check, on a dpll of the parent pin
that can belong to another driver, so reject them there as well.
No in-tree driver passes such ops. Add KUnit tests: the ops work on a dpll
of the domain of the pin, and are rejected on a dpll of another domain and
under a parent pin.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
---
drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c | 6 +-
drivers/dpll/dpll_core_kunit.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
index 8eb74682343156..84377f8ba16036 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
@@ -958,7 +958,8 @@ dpll_pin_register(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin,
dev_ops = dpll_device_ops(dpll);
if (WARN_ON(ops->measured_freq_get &&
- (!dev_ops || !dev_ops->freq_monitor_get ||
+ (pin->domain != dpll->domain || !dev_ops ||
+ !dev_ops->freq_monitor_get ||
!dev_ops->freq_monitor_set))) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out_unlock;
@@ -1065,7 +1066,8 @@ int dpll_pin_on_pin_register(struct dpll_pin *parent, struct dpll_pin *pin,
if (WARN_ON(!ops) ||
WARN_ON(!ops->state_on_pin_get) ||
- WARN_ON(!ops->direction_get))
+ WARN_ON(!ops->direction_get) ||
+ WARN_ON(ops->measured_freq_get))
return -EINVAL;
down_write(&dpll_lock);
diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core_kunit.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core_kunit.c
index a58800eda5ff51..84c405f855d8cb 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core_kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core_kunit.c
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct dt_reg {
struct dt_dev *dev;
struct dt_pin *parent;
struct dt_pin *notify;
+ const struct dpll_pin_ops *ops;
struct dpll_domain *forbid;
enum dpll_pin_state state;
enum dpll_pin_direction direction;
@@ -276,11 +277,33 @@ static int dt_lock_status_get(const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *priv,
return 0;
}
+static int dt_freq_monitor_set(const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *priv,
+ enum dpll_feature_state state,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int dt_freq_monitor_get(const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *priv,
+ enum dpll_feature_state *state,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ struct dt_dev *dev = priv;
+
+ dt_dev_enter(dev, dpll);
+ *state = DPLL_FEATURE_STATE_ENABLE;
+ dt_leave(dev->dom);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static const struct dpll_device_ops dt_dev_ops = {
.mode_get = dt_mode_get,
.mode_set = dt_mode_set,
.supported_modes_get = dt_supported_modes_get,
.lock_status_get = dt_lock_status_get,
+ .freq_monitor_set = dt_freq_monitor_set,
+ .freq_monitor_get = dt_freq_monitor_get,
};
static int dt_frequency_get(const struct dpll_pin *pin, void *pin_priv,
@@ -433,6 +456,21 @@ static int dt_ref_sync_get(const struct dpll_pin *pin, void *pin_priv,
return 0;
}
+static int dt_measured_freq_get(const struct dpll_pin *pin, void *pin_priv,
+ const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *dpll_priv,
+ u64 *measured_freq,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ struct dt_reg *reg = pin_priv;
+
+ dt_pin_enter(reg, pin);
+ atomic_inc(®->freq_gets);
+ *measured_freq = 1;
+ dt_leave(reg->dom);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static const struct dpll_pin_ops dt_pin_ops = {
.frequency_get = dt_frequency_get,
.state_on_dpll_get = dt_state_on_dpll_get,
@@ -446,6 +484,13 @@ static const struct dpll_pin_ops dt_pin_ops = {
.ref_sync_get = dt_ref_sync_get,
};
+static const struct dpll_pin_ops dt_pin_ops_measured = {
+ .measured_freq_get = dt_measured_freq_get,
+ .state_on_dpll_get = dt_state_on_dpll_get,
+ .state_on_pin_get = dt_state_on_pin_get,
+ .direction_get = dt_direction_get,
+};
+
static const struct dpll_pin_properties dt_prop = {
.type = DPLL_PIN_TYPE_EXT,
.capabilities = DPLL_PIN_CAPABILITIES_STATE_CAN_CHANGE |
@@ -570,9 +615,9 @@ static void dt_reg_release(void *data)
if (reg->parent)
dpll_pin_on_pin_unregister(reg->parent->pin, reg->pin->pin,
- &dt_pin_ops, reg);
+ reg->ops, reg);
else
- dpll_pin_unregister(reg->dev->dpll, reg->pin->pin, &dt_pin_ops,
+ dpll_pin_unregister(reg->dev->dpll, reg->pin->pin, reg->ops,
reg);
}
@@ -588,12 +633,14 @@ static void dt_reg_add(struct kunit *test, struct dt_reg *reg,
reg->parent = parent;
reg->state = DPLL_PIN_STATE_SELECTABLE;
reg->direction = DPLL_PIN_DIRECTION_INPUT;
+ if (!reg->ops)
+ reg->ops = &dt_pin_ops;
if (parent)
- ret = dpll_pin_on_pin_register(parent->pin, pin->pin,
- &dt_pin_ops, reg);
+ ret = dpll_pin_on_pin_register(parent->pin, pin->pin, reg->ops,
+ reg);
else
- ret = dpll_pin_register(dev->dpll, pin->pin, &dt_pin_ops, reg);
+ ret = dpll_pin_register(dev->dpll, pin->pin, reg->ops, reg);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, dt_reg_release,
reg), 0);
@@ -1432,6 +1479,59 @@ static void dt_test_ref_sync_pair(struct kunit *test)
dt_expect_events(test, (void *[]){ ctx->p.pin }, 1);
}
+/* A pin with a measured frequency must be in the domain of its dpll */
+static void dt_test_measured_freq_foreign(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct kunit_suppressed_warning *w;
+ struct dt_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct dt_reg *reg;
+ int ret;
+
+ dt_dev_add(test, &ctx->e0, &ctx->dom_e, DT_CLOCK_ID_E, 0,
+ DPLL_TYPE_PPS);
+ dt_dev_add(test, &ctx->f0, &ctx->dom_f, DT_CLOCK_ID_F, 0,
+ DPLL_TYPE_PPS);
+ dt_fwnode_pin_add(test, &ctx->x, DT_CLOCK_ID_E, DT_PIN_IDX_X);
+
+ reg = &ctx->reg_x_e0;
+ reg->ops = &dt_pin_ops_measured;
+ dt_reg_add(test, reg, &ctx->dom_e, &ctx->x, &ctx->e0, NULL);
+ atomic_set(®->freq_gets, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, dt_run(test, dt_pin_ntf, &ctx->x), 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_GT(test, atomic_read(®->freq_gets), 0);
+
+ w = kunit_start_suppress_warning(test);
+ ret = dpll_pin_register(ctx->f0.dpll, ctx->x.pin, reg->ops, reg);
+ kunit_end_suppress_warning(test, w);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -EINVAL);
+ if (!ret)
+ dpll_pin_unregister(ctx->f0.dpll, ctx->x.pin, reg->ops, reg);
+}
+
+/* A pin under a parent pin cannot have a measured frequency */
+static void dt_test_measured_freq_on_pin(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct kunit_suppressed_warning *w;
+ struct dt_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct dt_reg *reg;
+ int ret;
+
+ dt_on_pin_add(test);
+ dt_pin_add(test, &ctx->y, DT_CLOCK_ID_G, DT_PIN_IDX_Y, &dt_prop);
+ reg = &ctx->reg_c_m;
+
+ w = kunit_start_suppress_warning(test);
+ ret = dpll_pin_on_pin_register(ctx->m.pin, ctx->y.pin,
+ &dt_pin_ops_measured, reg);
+ kunit_end_suppress_warning(test, w);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -EINVAL);
+ if (!ret)
+ dpll_pin_on_pin_unregister(ctx->m.pin, ctx->y.pin,
+ &dt_pin_ops_measured, reg);
+}
+
static struct kunit_case dt_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_domain_sharing),
KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_domain_per_module),
@@ -1456,6 +1556,8 @@ static struct kunit_case dt_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_set_on_pin),
KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_device_set_ntf),
KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_ref_sync_pair),
+ KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_measured_freq_foreign),
+ KUNIT_CASE(dt_test_measured_freq_on_pin),
{}
};
--
2.56.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 12:09 [PATCH net-next 00/10] dpll: do not serialize driver callbacks under global dpll_lock Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] ice: dpll: notify TSPLL lock status from the periodic work only Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] ice: dpll: serialize changes of the SyncE CGU registers Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] dpll: add domain object Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:09 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] dpll: take domain locks around driver callbacks Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] dpll: convert dpll_lock to rwsem Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] dpll: add KUnit tests for core locking Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:10 ` Ivan Vecera [this message]
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] dpll: zl3073x: update locking comments Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] ice: dpll: " Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:10 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] dpll: document locking rules Ivan Vecera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261106121005.1327603-8-ivecera@redhat.com \
--to=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=grzegorz.nitka@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=karol.kolacinski@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=min.li@microchip.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=poros@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®