* [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region
@ 2026-05-09 3:50 Ruidong Tian
2026-05-12 16:16 ` Valentin Schneider
2026-11-06 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ruidong Tian @ 2026-05-09 3:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann,
rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, vschneid, kprateek.nayak
Cc: linux-kernel, oliver.yang, Ruidong Tian
task_struct keeps growing over time. On architectures that compute the
per-task stack canary offset from asm-offsets.h and pass it to the
compiler via -mstack-protector-guard-offset=, this growth eventually
pushes stack_canary beyond what the target ISA can encode.
On RISC-V, canary loads are emitted as
ld t0, TSK_STACK_CANARY(tp)
where TSK_STACK_CANARY must fit into a 12-bit signed immediate, i.e.
[-2048, 2047]. Once stack_canary sits past byte 2047 of task_struct,
the build fails with
cc1: error: '<N>' is not a valid offset in
'-mstack-protector-guard-offset='
* On RISC-V, CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK depends on !RANDSTRUCT,
so randomized_struct_fields_start/end always expand to nothing and
stack_canary lands at a small, stable offset well within the
12-bit signed immediate range. The build error goes away.
* On architectures that enable RANDSTRUCT for hardening, stack_canary
stays inside the randomized region and is still shuffled together
with the other fields by the layout randomization, so its hardening
coverage is preserved. asm-offsets-based architectures read the
shuffled offset at build time, so the generated canary accesses
remain correct.
pahole on a typical 64-bit config shows that the area around the
wakee_* fields already contains a usable hole:
struct __call_single_node wake_entry; /* 56 16 */
/* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
unsigned int wakee_flips; /* 72 4 */
/* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
unsigned long int wakee_flip_decay_ts; /* 80 8 */
struct task_struct * last_wakee; /* 88 8 */
Move wakee_flips to sit after last_wakee. That opens up a clean
8-byte slot at offset 72 into which stack_canary fits exactly:
struct __call_single_node wake_entry; /* 56 16 */
/* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
unsigned long stack_canary; /* 72 8 */
unsigned long int wakee_flip_decay_ts; /* 80 8 */
struct task_struct * last_wakee; /* 88 8 */
unsigned int wakee_flips; /* 96 4 */
Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ruidong Tian <tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 368c7b4d7cb5..5064c4afd19c 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -848,9 +848,15 @@ struct task_struct {
int on_cpu;
struct __call_single_node wake_entry;
- unsigned int wakee_flips;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
+ /* Canary value for the -fstack-protector GCC feature: */
+ unsigned long stack_canary;
+#endif
+
unsigned long wakee_flip_decay_ts;
struct task_struct *last_wakee;
+ unsigned int wakee_flips;
/*
* recent_used_cpu is initially set as the last CPU used by a task
@@ -1060,10 +1066,6 @@ struct task_struct {
pid_t pid;
pid_t tgid;
-#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
- /* Canary value for the -fstack-protector GCC feature: */
- unsigned long stack_canary;
-#endif
/*
* Pointers to the (original) parent process, youngest child, younger sibling,
* older sibling, respectively. (p->father can be replaced with
--
2.51.2.612.gdc70283dfc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region
2026-05-09 3:50 [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region Ruidong Tian
@ 2026-05-12 16:16 ` Valentin Schneider
2026-08-21 17:11 ` Charles Mirabile
2026-11-06 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Valentin Schneider @ 2026-05-12 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ruidong Tian, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot,
dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, kprateek.nayak
Cc: linux-kernel, oliver.yang, Ruidong Tian
On 09/05/26 11:50, Ruidong Tian wrote:
> task_struct keeps growing over time. On architectures that compute the
> per-task stack canary offset from asm-offsets.h and pass it to the
> compiler via -mstack-protector-guard-offset=, this growth eventually
> pushes stack_canary beyond what the target ISA can encode.
>
> On RISC-V, canary loads are emitted as
>
> ld t0, TSK_STACK_CANARY(tp)
>
> where TSK_STACK_CANARY must fit into a 12-bit signed immediate, i.e.
> [-2048, 2047]. Once stack_canary sits past byte 2047 of task_struct,
> the build fails with
>
> cc1: error: '<N>' is not a valid offset in
> '-mstack-protector-guard-offset='
>
> * On RISC-V, CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK depends on !RANDSTRUCT,
> so randomized_struct_fields_start/end always expand to nothing and
> stack_canary lands at a small, stable offset well within the
> 12-bit signed immediate range. The build error goes away.
>
> * On architectures that enable RANDSTRUCT for hardening, stack_canary
> stays inside the randomized region and is still shuffled together
> with the other fields by the layout randomization, so its hardening
> coverage is preserved. asm-offsets-based architectures read the
> shuffled offset at build time, so the generated canary accesses
> remain correct.
>
> pahole on a typical 64-bit config shows that the area around the
> wakee_* fields already contains a usable hole:
>
> struct __call_single_node wake_entry; /* 56 16 */
> /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
> unsigned int wakee_flips; /* 72 4 */
> /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
> unsigned long int wakee_flip_decay_ts; /* 80 8 */
> struct task_struct * last_wakee; /* 88 8 */
>
> Move wakee_flips to sit after last_wakee. That opens up a clean
> 8-byte slot at offset 72 into which stack_canary fits exactly:
>
> struct __call_single_node wake_entry; /* 56 16 */
> /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
> unsigned long stack_canary; /* 72 8 */
> unsigned long int wakee_flip_decay_ts; /* 80 8 */
> struct task_struct * last_wakee; /* 88 8 */
> unsigned int wakee_flips; /* 96 4 */
>
> Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ruidong Tian <tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region
2026-05-12 16:16 ` Valentin Schneider
@ 2026-08-21 17:11 ` Charles Mirabile
2026-11-06 15:29 ` Valentin Schneider
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Charles Mirabile @ 2026-08-21 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: vschneid
Cc: bsegall, dietmar.eggemann, juri.lelli, kprateek.nayak,
linux-kernel, mgorman, mingo, oliver.yang, peterz, rostedt,
tianruidong, vincent.guittot, pjw, palmer, aou, alex,
linux-riscv
Hi Ruidong, Valentin, (+ copying in RISC-V list/maintainers)—
On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 06:16:43PM +0200, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 09/05/26 11:50, Ruidong Tian wrote:
> > task_struct keeps growing over time. On architectures that compute the
> > per-task stack canary offset from asm-offsets.h and pass it to the
> > compiler via -mstack-protector-guard-offset=, this growth eventually
> > pushes stack_canary beyond what the target ISA can encode.
> >
> > On RISC-V, canary loads are emitted as
> >
> > ld t0, TSK_STACK_CANARY(tp)
> >
> > where TSK_STACK_CANARY must fit into a 12-bit signed immediate, i.e.
> > [-2048, 2047]. Once stack_canary sits past byte 2047 of task_struct,
> > the build fails with
> >
> > cc1: error: '<N>' is not a valid offset in
> > '-mstack-protector-guard-offset='
Thanks for this patch. We just ran into this exact issue during a CKI build
https://datawarehouse.cki-project.org/kcidb/builds/1639782 and this seems
like exactly the fix we need.
> >
> > * On RISC-V, CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK depends on !RANDSTRUCT,
> > so randomized_struct_fields_start/end always expand to nothing and
> > stack_canary lands at a small, stable offset well within the
> > 12-bit signed immediate range. The build error goes away.
> >
> > * On architectures that enable RANDSTRUCT for hardening, stack_canary
> > stays inside the randomized region and is still shuffled together
> > with the other fields by the layout randomization, so its hardening
> > coverage is preserved. asm-offsets-based architectures read the
> > shuffled offset at build time, so the generated canary accesses
> > remain correct.
> >
> > pahole on a typical 64-bit config shows that the area around the
> > wakee_* fields already contains a usable hole:
> >
> > struct __call_single_node wake_entry; /* 56 16 */
> > /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
> > unsigned int wakee_flips; /* 72 4 */
> > /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
> > unsigned long int wakee_flip_decay_ts; /* 80 8 */
> > struct task_struct * last_wakee; /* 88 8 */
> >
> > Move wakee_flips to sit after last_wakee. That opens up a clean
> > 8-byte slot at offset 72 into which stack_canary fits exactly:
> >
> > struct __call_single_node wake_entry; /* 56 16 */
> > /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
> > unsigned long stack_canary; /* 72 8 */
> > unsigned long int wakee_flip_decay_ts; /* 80 8 */
> > struct task_struct * last_wakee; /* 88 8 */
> > unsigned int wakee_flips; /* 96 4 */
> >
> > Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ruidong Tian <tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
>
Thanks for the review, is there any hope of this patch going in during
the 7.3 merge window?
I have also copied the RISC-V list as well, maybe if it is ok with the
sched folks, the RISC-V maintainers could take it through their tree as
a RISC-V specific urgent fix?
Best—Charlie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region
2026-08-21 17:11 ` Charles Mirabile
@ 2026-11-06 15:29 ` Valentin Schneider
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Valentin Schneider @ 2026-11-06 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Charles Mirabile
Cc: bsegall, dietmar.eggemann, juri.lelli, kprateek.nayak,
linux-kernel, mgorman, mingo, oliver.yang, peterz, rostedt,
tianruidong, vincent.guittot, pjw, palmer, aou, alex,
linux-riscv
On 21/08/26 13:11, Charles Mirabile wrote:
> Hi Ruidong, Valentin, (+ copying in RISC-V list/maintainers)—
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 06:16:43PM +0200, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>> On 09/05/26 11:50, Ruidong Tian wrote:
>> > task_struct keeps growing over time. On architectures that compute the
>> > per-task stack canary offset from asm-offsets.h and pass it to the
>> > compiler via -mstack-protector-guard-offset=, this growth eventually
>> > pushes stack_canary beyond what the target ISA can encode.
>> >
>> > On RISC-V, canary loads are emitted as
>> >
>> > ld t0, TSK_STACK_CANARY(tp)
>> >
>> > where TSK_STACK_CANARY must fit into a 12-bit signed immediate, i.e.
>> > [-2048, 2047]. Once stack_canary sits past byte 2047 of task_struct,
>> > the build fails with
>> >
>> > cc1: error: '<N>' is not a valid offset in
>> > '-mstack-protector-guard-offset='
>
> Thanks for this patch. We just ran into this exact issue during a CKI build
> https://datawarehouse.cki-project.org/kcidb/builds/1639782 and this seems
> like exactly the fix we need.
>
I've also been pinged about this exact failure;
Peter, Ingo, do you think you could take this?
I couldn't find anything better than to add a LUI instruction to stretch
the immediate beyond 2k, which is a bit wasteful. This looks okay for now,
until someone smarter can come with a risc-v specific improvement (or the
architecture grows scaled immediate offsets).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region
2026-05-09 3:50 [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region Ruidong Tian
2026-05-12 16:16 ` Valentin Schneider
@ 2026-11-06 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-06 16:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2026-11-06 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ruidong Tian
Cc: mingo, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt,
bsegall, mgorman, vschneid, kprateek.nayak, linux-kernel,
oliver.yang
On Sat, May 09, 2026 at 11:50:14AM +0800, Ruidong Tian wrote:
> task_struct keeps growing over time. On architectures that compute the
> per-task stack canary offset from asm-offsets.h and pass it to the
> compiler via -mstack-protector-guard-offset=, this growth eventually
> pushes stack_canary beyond what the target ISA can encode.
>
> On RISC-V, canary loads are emitted as
>
> ld t0, TSK_STACK_CANARY(tp)
>
> where TSK_STACK_CANARY must fit into a 12-bit signed immediate, i.e.
> [-2048, 2047]. Once stack_canary sits past byte 2047 of task_struct,
> the build fails with
>
> cc1: error: '<N>' is not a valid offset in
> '-mstack-protector-guard-offset='
>
> * On RISC-V, CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK depends on !RANDSTRUCT,
> so randomized_struct_fields_start/end always expand to nothing and
> stack_canary lands at a small, stable offset well within the
> 12-bit signed immediate range. The build error goes away.
>
> * On architectures that enable RANDSTRUCT for hardening, stack_canary
> stays inside the randomized region and is still shuffled together
> with the other fields by the layout randomization, so its hardening
> coverage is preserved. asm-offsets-based architectures read the
> shuffled offset at build time, so the generated canary accesses
> remain correct.
>
> pahole on a typical 64-bit config shows that the area around the
> wakee_* fields already contains a usable hole:
>
> struct __call_single_node wake_entry; /* 56 16 */
> /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
> unsigned int wakee_flips; /* 72 4 */
> /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
> unsigned long int wakee_flip_decay_ts; /* 80 8 */
> struct task_struct * last_wakee; /* 88 8 */
>
> Move wakee_flips to sit after last_wakee. That opens up a clean
> 8-byte slot at offset 72 into which stack_canary fits exactly:
>
> struct __call_single_node wake_entry; /* 56 16 */
> /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
> unsigned long stack_canary; /* 72 8 */
> unsigned long int wakee_flip_decay_ts; /* 80 8 */
> struct task_struct * last_wakee; /* 88 8 */
> unsigned int wakee_flips; /* 96 4 */
>
> Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ruidong Tian <tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 368c7b4d7cb5..5064c4afd19c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -848,9 +848,15 @@ struct task_struct {
>
> int on_cpu;
> struct __call_single_node wake_entry;
> - unsigned int wakee_flips;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
> + /* Canary value for the -fstack-protector GCC feature: */
> + unsigned long stack_canary;
> +#endif
> +
> unsigned long wakee_flip_decay_ts;
> struct task_struct *last_wakee;
> + unsigned int wakee_flips;
>
> /*
> * recent_used_cpu is initially set as the last CPU used by a task
> @@ -1060,10 +1066,6 @@ struct task_struct {
> pid_t pid;
> pid_t tgid;
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
> - /* Canary value for the -fstack-protector GCC feature: */
> - unsigned long stack_canary;
> -#endif
> /*
> * Pointers to the (original) parent process, youngest child, younger sibling,
> * older sibling, respectively. (p->father can be replaced with
This seems exceedingly random; and very prone to also randomly breaking
as task_struct is further modified.
Why not do something a little more structured; like so?
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h | 4 ++--
arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h | 7 +++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 7 +++----
drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/sched.h | 6 +++++-
kernel/fork.c | 2 +-
6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h
index 43895b90fe3f..b56e49ce0580 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h
@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ static __always_inline void boot_init_stack_canary(void)
{
unsigned long canary = get_random_canary();
- current->stack_canary = canary;
+ tsk_stack_canary(current) = canary;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK))
- __stack_chk_guard = current->stack_canary;
+ __stack_chk_guard = tsk_stack_canary(current);
}
#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_STACKPROTECTOR_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
index 55019fdfa9ec..eed764f06682 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ struct thread_info {
*/
unsigned long a0, a1, a2;
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
+ unsigned long stack_canary;
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
struct cfi_state user_cfi_state;
#endif
@@ -86,6 +89,10 @@ struct thread_info {
#define INIT_SCS
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
+#define tsk_stack_canary(p) ((p)->thread_info.stack_canary)
+#endif
+
/*
* macros/functions for gaining access to the thread information structure
*
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index a75f0cfea1e9..eb694e1215bb 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ void asm_offsets(void)
OFFSET(TASK_TI_A1, task_struct, thread_info.a1);
OFFSET(TASK_TI_A2, task_struct, thread_info.a2);
#endif
-
+#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
+ OFFSET(TSK_STACK_CANARY, task_struct, thread_info.stack_canary);
+#endif
OFFSET(TASK_TI_CPU_NUM, task_struct, thread_info.cpu);
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
OFFSET(TASK_TI_CFI_STATE, task_struct, thread_info.user_cfi_state);
@@ -88,9 +90,6 @@ void asm_offsets(void)
OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F30, task_struct, thread.fstate.f[30]);
OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F31, task_struct, thread.fstate.f[31]);
OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_FCSR, task_struct, thread.fstate.fcsr);
-#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
- OFFSET(TSK_STACK_CANARY, task_struct, stack_canary);
-#endif
DEFINE(PT_SIZE, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
OFFSET(PT_EPC, pt_regs, epc);
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
index 2761685cf4f8..977ee7584249 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
@@ -247,9 +247,9 @@ static noinline void __lkdtm_REPORT_STACK_CANARY(void *stack)
for (i = 1; i < 16; i++) {
canary = (unsigned long *)stack + i;
#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
- if (*canary == current->stack_canary)
+ if (*canary == tsk_stack_canary(current))
current_offset = i;
- if (*canary == init_task.stack_canary)
+ if (*canary == tsk_stack_canary(&init_task))
init_offset = i;
#endif
}
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index e4f6323d7855..b7702fefed63 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ struct task_struct {
pid_t pid;
pid_t tgid;
-#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
+#if defined(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR) && !defined(tsk_stack_canary)
/* Canary value for the -fstack-protector GCC feature: */
unsigned long stack_canary;
#endif
@@ -1697,6 +1697,10 @@ struct task_struct {
randomized_struct_fields_end
} __attribute__ ((aligned (64)));
+#if defined(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR) && !defined(tsk_stack_canary)
+#define tsk_stack_canary(p) ((p)->stack_canary)
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC
DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(__sched_proxy_exec);
static inline bool sched_proxy_exec(void)
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 5efceb8d58a7..878d586bda25 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -964,7 +964,7 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig, int node)
clear_syscall_work_syscall_user_dispatch(tsk);
#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
- tsk->stack_canary = get_random_canary();
+ tsk_stack_canary(tsk) = get_random_canary();
#endif
if (orig->cpus_ptr == &orig->cpus_mask)
tsk->cpus_ptr = &tsk->cpus_mask;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region
2026-11-06 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2026-11-06 16:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2026-11-06 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ruidong Tian
Cc: mingo, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt,
bsegall, mgorman, vschneid, kprateek.nayak, linux-kernel,
oliver.yang
On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 05:07:30PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Why not do something a little more structured; like so?
>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h | 4 ++--
> arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h | 7 +++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 7 +++----
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c | 4 ++--
> include/linux/sched.h | 6 +++++-
> kernel/fork.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h
> index 43895b90fe3f..b56e49ce0580 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h
> @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ static __always_inline void boot_init_stack_canary(void)
> {
> unsigned long canary = get_random_canary();
>
> - current->stack_canary = canary;
> + tsk_stack_canary(current) = canary;
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK))
> - __stack_chk_guard = current->stack_canary;
> + __stack_chk_guard = tsk_stack_canary(current);
> }
> #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_STACKPROTECTOR_H */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index 55019fdfa9ec..eed764f06682 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ struct thread_info {
> */
> unsigned long a0, a1, a2;
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
> + unsigned long stack_canary;
> +#endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
> struct cfi_state user_cfi_state;
> #endif
> @@ -86,6 +89,10 @@ struct thread_info {
> #define INIT_SCS
> #endif
>
This should probably have a comment about 12 bit immediates somewhere.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
> +#define tsk_stack_canary(p) ((p)->thread_info.stack_canary)
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * macros/functions for gaining access to the thread information structure
> *
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> index a75f0cfea1e9..eb694e1215bb 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ void asm_offsets(void)
> OFFSET(TASK_TI_A1, task_struct, thread_info.a1);
> OFFSET(TASK_TI_A2, task_struct, thread_info.a2);
> #endif
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
> + OFFSET(TSK_STACK_CANARY, task_struct, thread_info.stack_canary);
> +#endif
> OFFSET(TASK_TI_CPU_NUM, task_struct, thread_info.cpu);
> #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
> OFFSET(TASK_TI_CFI_STATE, task_struct, thread_info.user_cfi_state);
> @@ -88,9 +90,6 @@ void asm_offsets(void)
> OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F30, task_struct, thread.fstate.f[30]);
> OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F31, task_struct, thread.fstate.f[31]);
> OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_FCSR, task_struct, thread.fstate.fcsr);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
> - OFFSET(TSK_STACK_CANARY, task_struct, stack_canary);
> -#endif
>
> DEFINE(PT_SIZE, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
> OFFSET(PT_EPC, pt_regs, epc);
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
> index 2761685cf4f8..977ee7584249 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
> @@ -247,9 +247,9 @@ static noinline void __lkdtm_REPORT_STACK_CANARY(void *stack)
> for (i = 1; i < 16; i++) {
> canary = (unsigned long *)stack + i;
> #ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
> - if (*canary == current->stack_canary)
> + if (*canary == tsk_stack_canary(current))
> current_offset = i;
> - if (*canary == init_task.stack_canary)
> + if (*canary == tsk_stack_canary(&init_task))
> init_offset = i;
> #endif
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index e4f6323d7855..b7702fefed63 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ struct task_struct {
> pid_t pid;
> pid_t tgid;
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
> +#if defined(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR) && !defined(tsk_stack_canary)
> /* Canary value for the -fstack-protector GCC feature: */
> unsigned long stack_canary;
> #endif
> @@ -1697,6 +1697,10 @@ struct task_struct {
> randomized_struct_fields_end
> } __attribute__ ((aligned (64)));
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR) && !defined(tsk_stack_canary)
> +#define tsk_stack_canary(p) ((p)->stack_canary)
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC
> DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(__sched_proxy_exec);
> static inline bool sched_proxy_exec(void)
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 5efceb8d58a7..878d586bda25 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -964,7 +964,7 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig, int node)
> clear_syscall_work_syscall_user_dispatch(tsk);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
> - tsk->stack_canary = get_random_canary();
> + tsk_stack_canary(tsk) = get_random_canary();
> #endif
> if (orig->cpus_ptr == &orig->cpus_mask)
> tsk->cpus_ptr = &tsk->cpus_mask;
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-06 16:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-09 3:50 [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region Ruidong Tian
2026-05-12 16:16 ` Valentin Schneider
2026-08-21 17:11 ` Charles Mirabile
2026-11-06 15:29 ` Valentin Schneider
2026-11-06 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-06 16:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®