mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region
@ 2026-05-09  3:50 Ruidong Tian
  2026-05-12 16:16 ` Valentin Schneider
  2026-11-06 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ruidong Tian @ 2026-05-09  3:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann,
	rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, vschneid, kprateek.nayak
  Cc: linux-kernel, oliver.yang, Ruidong Tian

task_struct keeps growing over time.  On architectures that compute the
per-task stack canary offset from asm-offsets.h and pass it to the
compiler via -mstack-protector-guard-offset=, this growth eventually
pushes stack_canary beyond what the target ISA can encode.

On RISC-V, canary loads are emitted as

    ld	t0, TSK_STACK_CANARY(tp)

where TSK_STACK_CANARY must fit into a 12-bit signed immediate, i.e.
[-2048, 2047].  Once stack_canary sits past byte 2047 of task_struct,
the build fails with

    cc1: error: '<N>' is not a valid offset in
        '-mstack-protector-guard-offset='

  * On RISC-V, CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK depends on !RANDSTRUCT,
    so randomized_struct_fields_start/end always expand to nothing and
    stack_canary lands at a small, stable offset well within the
    12-bit signed immediate range.  The build error goes away.

  * On architectures that enable RANDSTRUCT for hardening, stack_canary
    stays inside the randomized region and is still shuffled together
    with the other fields by the layout randomization, so its hardening
    coverage is preserved.  asm-offsets-based architectures read the
    shuffled offset at build time, so the generated canary accesses
    remain correct.

pahole on a typical 64-bit config shows that the area around the
wakee_* fields already contains a usable hole:

    struct __call_single_node  wake_entry;           /*    56    16 */
    /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) ---       */
    unsigned int               wakee_flips;          /*    72     4 */
    /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
    unsigned long int          wakee_flip_decay_ts;  /*    80     8 */
    struct task_struct *       last_wakee;           /*    88     8 */

Move wakee_flips to sit after last_wakee.  That opens up a clean
8-byte slot at offset 72 into which stack_canary fits exactly:

    struct __call_single_node  wake_entry;           /*    56    16 */
    /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) ---       */
    unsigned long              stack_canary;         /*    72     8 */
    unsigned long int          wakee_flip_decay_ts;  /*    80     8 */
    struct task_struct *       last_wakee;           /*    88     8 */
    unsigned int               wakee_flips;          /*    96     4 */

Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ruidong Tian <tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 368c7b4d7cb5..5064c4afd19c 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -848,9 +848,15 @@ struct task_struct {
 
 	int				on_cpu;
 	struct __call_single_node	wake_entry;
-	unsigned int			wakee_flips;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
+	/* Canary value for the -fstack-protector GCC feature: */
+	unsigned long			stack_canary;
+#endif
+
 	unsigned long			wakee_flip_decay_ts;
 	struct task_struct		*last_wakee;
+	unsigned int			wakee_flips;
 
 	/*
 	 * recent_used_cpu is initially set as the last CPU used by a task
@@ -1060,10 +1066,6 @@ struct task_struct {
 	pid_t				pid;
 	pid_t				tgid;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
-	/* Canary value for the -fstack-protector GCC feature: */
-	unsigned long			stack_canary;
-#endif
 	/*
 	 * Pointers to the (original) parent process, youngest child, younger sibling,
 	 * older sibling, respectively.  (p->father can be replaced with
-- 
2.51.2.612.gdc70283dfc


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region
  2026-05-09  3:50 [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region Ruidong Tian
@ 2026-05-12 16:16 ` Valentin Schneider
  2026-08-21 17:11   ` Charles Mirabile
  2026-11-06 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Valentin Schneider @ 2026-05-12 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ruidong Tian, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot,
	dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, kprateek.nayak
  Cc: linux-kernel, oliver.yang, Ruidong Tian

On 09/05/26 11:50, Ruidong Tian wrote:
> task_struct keeps growing over time.  On architectures that compute the
> per-task stack canary offset from asm-offsets.h and pass it to the
> compiler via -mstack-protector-guard-offset=, this growth eventually
> pushes stack_canary beyond what the target ISA can encode.
>
> On RISC-V, canary loads are emitted as
>
>     ld	t0, TSK_STACK_CANARY(tp)
>
> where TSK_STACK_CANARY must fit into a 12-bit signed immediate, i.e.
> [-2048, 2047].  Once stack_canary sits past byte 2047 of task_struct,
> the build fails with
>
>     cc1: error: '<N>' is not a valid offset in
>         '-mstack-protector-guard-offset='
>
>   * On RISC-V, CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK depends on !RANDSTRUCT,
>     so randomized_struct_fields_start/end always expand to nothing and
>     stack_canary lands at a small, stable offset well within the
>     12-bit signed immediate range.  The build error goes away.
>
>   * On architectures that enable RANDSTRUCT for hardening, stack_canary
>     stays inside the randomized region and is still shuffled together
>     with the other fields by the layout randomization, so its hardening
>     coverage is preserved.  asm-offsets-based architectures read the
>     shuffled offset at build time, so the generated canary accesses
>     remain correct.
>
> pahole on a typical 64-bit config shows that the area around the
> wakee_* fields already contains a usable hole:
>
>     struct __call_single_node  wake_entry;           /*    56    16 */
>     /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) ---       */
>     unsigned int               wakee_flips;          /*    72     4 */
>     /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
>     unsigned long int          wakee_flip_decay_ts;  /*    80     8 */
>     struct task_struct *       last_wakee;           /*    88     8 */
>
> Move wakee_flips to sit after last_wakee.  That opens up a clean
> 8-byte slot at offset 72 into which stack_canary fits exactly:
>
>     struct __call_single_node  wake_entry;           /*    56    16 */
>     /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) ---       */
>     unsigned long              stack_canary;         /*    72     8 */
>     unsigned long int          wakee_flip_decay_ts;  /*    80     8 */
>     struct task_struct *       last_wakee;           /*    88     8 */
>     unsigned int               wakee_flips;          /*    96     4 */
>
> Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ruidong Tian <tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>

Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region
  2026-05-12 16:16 ` Valentin Schneider
@ 2026-08-21 17:11   ` Charles Mirabile
  2026-11-06 15:29     ` Valentin Schneider
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Charles Mirabile @ 2026-08-21 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: vschneid
  Cc: bsegall, dietmar.eggemann, juri.lelli, kprateek.nayak,
	linux-kernel, mgorman, mingo, oliver.yang, peterz, rostedt,
	tianruidong, vincent.guittot, pjw, palmer, aou, alex,
	linux-riscv

Hi Ruidong, Valentin, (+ copying in RISC-V list/maintainers)—

On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 06:16:43PM +0200, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 09/05/26 11:50, Ruidong Tian wrote:
> > task_struct keeps growing over time.  On architectures that compute the
> > per-task stack canary offset from asm-offsets.h and pass it to the
> > compiler via -mstack-protector-guard-offset=, this growth eventually
> > pushes stack_canary beyond what the target ISA can encode.
> >
> > On RISC-V, canary loads are emitted as
> >
> >     ld	t0, TSK_STACK_CANARY(tp)
> >
> > where TSK_STACK_CANARY must fit into a 12-bit signed immediate, i.e.
> > [-2048, 2047].  Once stack_canary sits past byte 2047 of task_struct,
> > the build fails with
> >
> >     cc1: error: '<N>' is not a valid offset in
> >         '-mstack-protector-guard-offset='

Thanks for this patch. We just ran into this exact issue during a CKI build
https://datawarehouse.cki-project.org/kcidb/builds/1639782 and this seems
like exactly the fix we need.

> >
> >   * On RISC-V, CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK depends on !RANDSTRUCT,
> >     so randomized_struct_fields_start/end always expand to nothing and
> >     stack_canary lands at a small, stable offset well within the
> >     12-bit signed immediate range.  The build error goes away.
> >
> >   * On architectures that enable RANDSTRUCT for hardening, stack_canary
> >     stays inside the randomized region and is still shuffled together
> >     with the other fields by the layout randomization, so its hardening
> >     coverage is preserved.  asm-offsets-based architectures read the
> >     shuffled offset at build time, so the generated canary accesses
> >     remain correct.
> >
> > pahole on a typical 64-bit config shows that the area around the
> > wakee_* fields already contains a usable hole:
> >
> >     struct __call_single_node  wake_entry;           /*    56    16 */
> >     /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) ---       */
> >     unsigned int               wakee_flips;          /*    72     4 */
> >     /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
> >     unsigned long int          wakee_flip_decay_ts;  /*    80     8 */
> >     struct task_struct *       last_wakee;           /*    88     8 */
> >
> > Move wakee_flips to sit after last_wakee.  That opens up a clean
> > 8-byte slot at offset 72 into which stack_canary fits exactly:
> >
> >     struct __call_single_node  wake_entry;           /*    56    16 */
> >     /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) ---       */
> >     unsigned long              stack_canary;         /*    72     8 */
> >     unsigned long int          wakee_flip_decay_ts;  /*    80     8 */
> >     struct task_struct *       last_wakee;           /*    88     8 */
> >     unsigned int               wakee_flips;          /*    96     4 */
> >
> > Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ruidong Tian <tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> 

Thanks for the review, is there any hope of this patch going in during
the 7.3 merge window?

I have also copied the RISC-V list as well, maybe if it is ok with the
sched folks, the RISC-V maintainers could take it through their tree as
a RISC-V specific urgent fix?

Best—Charlie


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region
  2026-08-21 17:11   ` Charles Mirabile
@ 2026-11-06 15:29     ` Valentin Schneider
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Valentin Schneider @ 2026-11-06 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Charles Mirabile
  Cc: bsegall, dietmar.eggemann, juri.lelli, kprateek.nayak,
	linux-kernel, mgorman, mingo, oliver.yang, peterz, rostedt,
	tianruidong, vincent.guittot, pjw, palmer, aou, alex,
	linux-riscv

On 21/08/26 13:11, Charles Mirabile wrote:
> Hi Ruidong, Valentin, (+ copying in RISC-V list/maintainers)—
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 06:16:43PM +0200, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>> On 09/05/26 11:50, Ruidong Tian wrote:
>> > task_struct keeps growing over time.  On architectures that compute the
>> > per-task stack canary offset from asm-offsets.h and pass it to the
>> > compiler via -mstack-protector-guard-offset=, this growth eventually
>> > pushes stack_canary beyond what the target ISA can encode.
>> >
>> > On RISC-V, canary loads are emitted as
>> >
>> >     ld	t0, TSK_STACK_CANARY(tp)
>> >
>> > where TSK_STACK_CANARY must fit into a 12-bit signed immediate, i.e.
>> > [-2048, 2047].  Once stack_canary sits past byte 2047 of task_struct,
>> > the build fails with
>> >
>> >     cc1: error: '<N>' is not a valid offset in
>> >         '-mstack-protector-guard-offset='
>
> Thanks for this patch. We just ran into this exact issue during a CKI build
> https://datawarehouse.cki-project.org/kcidb/builds/1639782 and this seems
> like exactly the fix we need.
>

I've also been pinged about this exact failure;

Peter, Ingo, do you think you could take this?
I couldn't find anything better than to add a LUI instruction to stretch
the immediate beyond 2k, which is a bit wasteful. This looks okay for now,
until someone smarter can come with a risc-v specific improvement (or the
architecture grows scaled immediate offsets).


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region
  2026-05-09  3:50 [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region Ruidong Tian
  2026-05-12 16:16 ` Valentin Schneider
@ 2026-11-06 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
  2026-11-06 16:14   ` Peter Zijlstra
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2026-11-06 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ruidong Tian
  Cc: mingo, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt,
	bsegall, mgorman, vschneid, kprateek.nayak, linux-kernel,
	oliver.yang

On Sat, May 09, 2026 at 11:50:14AM +0800, Ruidong Tian wrote:
> task_struct keeps growing over time.  On architectures that compute the
> per-task stack canary offset from asm-offsets.h and pass it to the
> compiler via -mstack-protector-guard-offset=, this growth eventually
> pushes stack_canary beyond what the target ISA can encode.
> 
> On RISC-V, canary loads are emitted as
> 
>     ld	t0, TSK_STACK_CANARY(tp)
> 
> where TSK_STACK_CANARY must fit into a 12-bit signed immediate, i.e.
> [-2048, 2047].  Once stack_canary sits past byte 2047 of task_struct,
> the build fails with
> 
>     cc1: error: '<N>' is not a valid offset in
>         '-mstack-protector-guard-offset='
> 
>   * On RISC-V, CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK depends on !RANDSTRUCT,
>     so randomized_struct_fields_start/end always expand to nothing and
>     stack_canary lands at a small, stable offset well within the
>     12-bit signed immediate range.  The build error goes away.
> 
>   * On architectures that enable RANDSTRUCT for hardening, stack_canary
>     stays inside the randomized region and is still shuffled together
>     with the other fields by the layout randomization, so its hardening
>     coverage is preserved.  asm-offsets-based architectures read the
>     shuffled offset at build time, so the generated canary accesses
>     remain correct.
> 
> pahole on a typical 64-bit config shows that the area around the
> wakee_* fields already contains a usable hole:
> 
>     struct __call_single_node  wake_entry;           /*    56    16 */
>     /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) ---       */
>     unsigned int               wakee_flips;          /*    72     4 */
>     /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
>     unsigned long int          wakee_flip_decay_ts;  /*    80     8 */
>     struct task_struct *       last_wakee;           /*    88     8 */
> 
> Move wakee_flips to sit after last_wakee.  That opens up a clean
> 8-byte slot at offset 72 into which stack_canary fits exactly:
> 
>     struct __call_single_node  wake_entry;           /*    56    16 */
>     /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) ---       */
>     unsigned long              stack_canary;         /*    72     8 */
>     unsigned long int          wakee_flip_decay_ts;  /*    80     8 */
>     struct task_struct *       last_wakee;           /*    88     8 */
>     unsigned int               wakee_flips;          /*    96     4 */
> 
> Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ruidong Tian <tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/sched.h | 12 +++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 368c7b4d7cb5..5064c4afd19c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -848,9 +848,15 @@ struct task_struct {
>  
>  	int				on_cpu;
>  	struct __call_single_node	wake_entry;
> -	unsigned int			wakee_flips;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
> +	/* Canary value for the -fstack-protector GCC feature: */
> +	unsigned long			stack_canary;
> +#endif
> +
>  	unsigned long			wakee_flip_decay_ts;
>  	struct task_struct		*last_wakee;
> +	unsigned int			wakee_flips;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * recent_used_cpu is initially set as the last CPU used by a task
> @@ -1060,10 +1066,6 @@ struct task_struct {
>  	pid_t				pid;
>  	pid_t				tgid;
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
> -	/* Canary value for the -fstack-protector GCC feature: */
> -	unsigned long			stack_canary;
> -#endif
>  	/*
>  	 * Pointers to the (original) parent process, youngest child, younger sibling,
>  	 * older sibling, respectively.  (p->father can be replaced with

This seems exceedingly random; and very prone to also randomly breaking
as task_struct is further modified.

Why not do something a little more structured; like so?

---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h | 4 ++--
 arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h    | 7 +++++++
 arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c         | 7 +++----
 drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c               | 4 ++--
 include/linux/sched.h                   | 6 +++++-
 kernel/fork.c                           | 2 +-
 6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h
index 43895b90fe3f..b56e49ce0580 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h
@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ static __always_inline void boot_init_stack_canary(void)
 {
 	unsigned long canary = get_random_canary();
 
-	current->stack_canary = canary;
+	tsk_stack_canary(current) = canary;
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK))
-		__stack_chk_guard = current->stack_canary;
+		__stack_chk_guard = tsk_stack_canary(current);
 }
 #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_STACKPROTECTOR_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
index 55019fdfa9ec..eed764f06682 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ struct thread_info {
 	 */
 	unsigned long		a0, a1, a2;
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
+	unsigned long		stack_canary;
+#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
 	struct cfi_state	user_cfi_state;
 #endif
@@ -86,6 +89,10 @@ struct thread_info {
 #define INIT_SCS
 #endif
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
+#define tsk_stack_canary(p) ((p)->thread_info.stack_canary)
+#endif
+
 /*
  * macros/functions for gaining access to the thread information structure
  *
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index a75f0cfea1e9..eb694e1215bb 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ void asm_offsets(void)
 	OFFSET(TASK_TI_A1, task_struct, thread_info.a1);
 	OFFSET(TASK_TI_A2, task_struct, thread_info.a2);
 #endif
-
+#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
+	OFFSET(TSK_STACK_CANARY, task_struct, thread_info.stack_canary);
+#endif
 	OFFSET(TASK_TI_CPU_NUM, task_struct, thread_info.cpu);
 #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
 	OFFSET(TASK_TI_CFI_STATE, task_struct, thread_info.user_cfi_state);
@@ -88,9 +90,6 @@ void asm_offsets(void)
 	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F30, task_struct, thread.fstate.f[30]);
 	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F31, task_struct, thread.fstate.f[31]);
 	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_FCSR, task_struct, thread.fstate.fcsr);
-#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
-	OFFSET(TSK_STACK_CANARY, task_struct, stack_canary);
-#endif
 
 	DEFINE(PT_SIZE, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
 	OFFSET(PT_EPC, pt_regs, epc);
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
index 2761685cf4f8..977ee7584249 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
@@ -247,9 +247,9 @@ static noinline void __lkdtm_REPORT_STACK_CANARY(void *stack)
 	for (i = 1; i < 16; i++) {
 		canary = (unsigned long *)stack + i;
 #ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
-		if (*canary == current->stack_canary)
+		if (*canary == tsk_stack_canary(current))
 			current_offset = i;
-		if (*canary == init_task.stack_canary)
+		if (*canary == tsk_stack_canary(&init_task))
 			init_offset = i;
 #endif
 	}
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index e4f6323d7855..b7702fefed63 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ struct task_struct {
 	pid_t				pid;
 	pid_t				tgid;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
+#if defined(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR) && !defined(tsk_stack_canary)
 	/* Canary value for the -fstack-protector GCC feature: */
 	unsigned long			stack_canary;
 #endif
@@ -1697,6 +1697,10 @@ struct task_struct {
 	randomized_struct_fields_end
 } __attribute__ ((aligned (64)));
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR) && !defined(tsk_stack_canary)
+#define tsk_stack_canary(p) ((p)->stack_canary)
+#endif
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC
 DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(__sched_proxy_exec);
 static inline bool sched_proxy_exec(void)
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 5efceb8d58a7..878d586bda25 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -964,7 +964,7 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig, int node)
 	clear_syscall_work_syscall_user_dispatch(tsk);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
-	tsk->stack_canary = get_random_canary();
+	tsk_stack_canary(tsk) = get_random_canary();
 #endif
 	if (orig->cpus_ptr == &orig->cpus_mask)
 		tsk->cpus_ptr = &tsk->cpus_mask;



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region
  2026-11-06 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2026-11-06 16:14   ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2026-11-06 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ruidong Tian
  Cc: mingo, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt,
	bsegall, mgorman, vschneid, kprateek.nayak, linux-kernel,
	oliver.yang

On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 05:07:30PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Why not do something a little more structured; like so?
> 
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h | 4 ++--
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h    | 7 +++++++
>  arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c         | 7 +++----
>  drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c               | 4 ++--
>  include/linux/sched.h                   | 6 +++++-
>  kernel/fork.c                           | 2 +-
>  6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h
> index 43895b90fe3f..b56e49ce0580 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/stackprotector.h
> @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ static __always_inline void boot_init_stack_canary(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long canary = get_random_canary();
>  
> -	current->stack_canary = canary;
> +	tsk_stack_canary(current) = canary;
>  	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK))
> -		__stack_chk_guard = current->stack_canary;
> +		__stack_chk_guard = tsk_stack_canary(current);
>  }
>  #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_STACKPROTECTOR_H */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index 55019fdfa9ec..eed764f06682 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ struct thread_info {
>  	 */
>  	unsigned long		a0, a1, a2;
>  #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
> +	unsigned long		stack_canary;
> +#endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
>  	struct cfi_state	user_cfi_state;
>  #endif
> @@ -86,6 +89,10 @@ struct thread_info {
>  #define INIT_SCS
>  #endif
>  

This should probably have a comment about 12 bit immediates somewhere.

> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
> +#define tsk_stack_canary(p) ((p)->thread_info.stack_canary)
> +#endif
> +
>  /*
>   * macros/functions for gaining access to the thread information structure
>   *
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> index a75f0cfea1e9..eb694e1215bb 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ void asm_offsets(void)
>  	OFFSET(TASK_TI_A1, task_struct, thread_info.a1);
>  	OFFSET(TASK_TI_A2, task_struct, thread_info.a2);
>  #endif
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
> +	OFFSET(TSK_STACK_CANARY, task_struct, thread_info.stack_canary);
> +#endif
>  	OFFSET(TASK_TI_CPU_NUM, task_struct, thread_info.cpu);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
>  	OFFSET(TASK_TI_CFI_STATE, task_struct, thread_info.user_cfi_state);
> @@ -88,9 +90,6 @@ void asm_offsets(void)
>  	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F30, task_struct, thread.fstate.f[30]);
>  	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F31, task_struct, thread.fstate.f[31]);
>  	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_FCSR, task_struct, thread.fstate.fcsr);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
> -	OFFSET(TSK_STACK_CANARY, task_struct, stack_canary);
> -#endif
>  
>  	DEFINE(PT_SIZE, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
>  	OFFSET(PT_EPC, pt_regs, epc);
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
> index 2761685cf4f8..977ee7584249 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
> @@ -247,9 +247,9 @@ static noinline void __lkdtm_REPORT_STACK_CANARY(void *stack)
>  	for (i = 1; i < 16; i++) {
>  		canary = (unsigned long *)stack + i;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
> -		if (*canary == current->stack_canary)
> +		if (*canary == tsk_stack_canary(current))
>  			current_offset = i;
> -		if (*canary == init_task.stack_canary)
> +		if (*canary == tsk_stack_canary(&init_task))
>  			init_offset = i;
>  #endif
>  	}
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index e4f6323d7855..b7702fefed63 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ struct task_struct {
>  	pid_t				pid;
>  	pid_t				tgid;
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
> +#if defined(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR) && !defined(tsk_stack_canary)
>  	/* Canary value for the -fstack-protector GCC feature: */
>  	unsigned long			stack_canary;
>  #endif
> @@ -1697,6 +1697,10 @@ struct task_struct {
>  	randomized_struct_fields_end
>  } __attribute__ ((aligned (64)));
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR) && !defined(tsk_stack_canary)
> +#define tsk_stack_canary(p) ((p)->stack_canary)
> +#endif
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC
>  DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(__sched_proxy_exec);
>  static inline bool sched_proxy_exec(void)
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 5efceb8d58a7..878d586bda25 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -964,7 +964,7 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig, int node)
>  	clear_syscall_work_syscall_user_dispatch(tsk);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
> -	tsk->stack_canary = get_random_canary();
> +	tsk_stack_canary(tsk) = get_random_canary();
>  #endif
>  	if (orig->cpus_ptr == &orig->cpus_mask)
>  		tsk->cpus_ptr = &tsk->cpus_mask;
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-06 16:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-09  3:50 [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region Ruidong Tian
2026-05-12 16:16 ` Valentin Schneider
2026-08-21 17:11   ` Charles Mirabile
2026-11-06 15:29     ` Valentin Schneider
2026-11-06 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-06 16:14   ` Peter Zijlstra

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®