From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andre Edich <andre.edich@microchip.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/3] net: phy: enable polling when driver implements get_next_update_time
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 16:03:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <248bbbcf-ec7a-4ae4-a502-8f2575c18bbb@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250709104210.3807203-2-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 12:42:08PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Currently, phy_polling_mode() enables polling only if:
> - the PHY is in interrupt-less mode, or
> - the driver provides an update_stats() callback.
>
> This excludes drivers that implement get_next_update_time()
> to support adaptive polling but do not provide update_stats().
> As a result, the state machine timer will not run, and the
> get_next_update_time() callback is never used.
>
> This patch extends the polling condition to include drivers that
> implement get_next_update_time(). This change is required to support
> adaptive polling in the SMSC LAN9512/LAN8700 PHY family, which cannot
> reliably use interrupts.
>
> No in-tree drivers rely on this mechanism yet, so existing behavior is
> unchanged. If any out-of-tree driver incorrectly implements
> get_next_update_time(), enabling polling is still the correct behavior.
>
> Fixes: 8bf47e4d7b87 ("net: phy: Add support for driver-specific next update time")
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-09 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-09 10:42 [PATCH net v2 0/3] net: phy: smsc: use IRQ + relaxed polling to fix missed link-up Oleksij Rempel
2025-07-09 10:42 ` [PATCH net v2 1/3] net: phy: enable polling when driver implements get_next_update_time Oleksij Rempel
2025-07-09 14:03 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2025-07-09 10:42 ` [PATCH net v2 2/3] net: phy: allow drivers to disable polling via get_next_update_time() Oleksij Rempel
2025-07-09 14:10 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-07-09 15:23 ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-07-09 10:42 ` [PATCH net v2 3/3] net: phy: smsc: recover missed link-up IRQs on LAN8700 with adaptive polling Oleksij Rempel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=248bbbcf-ec7a-4ae4-a502-8f2575c18bbb@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=andre.edich@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®