From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andre Edich <andre.edich@microchip.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/3] net: phy: allow drivers to disable polling via get_next_update_time()
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 17:23:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aG6Ja_Y9JNKkEon6@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e0b00f28-051e-4af6-afcb-7cdb5dc76549@lunn.ch>
On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 04:10:48PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > /* Only re-schedule a PHY state machine change if we are polling the
> > - * PHY, if PHY_MAC_INTERRUPT is set, then we will be moving
> > - * between states from phy_mac_interrupt().
> > + * PHY. If PHY_MAC_INTERRUPT is set or get_next_update_time() returns
> > + * PHY_STATE_IRQ, then we rely on interrupts for state changes.
> > *
> > * In state PHY_HALTED the PHY gets suspended, so rescheduling the
> > * state machine would be pointless and possibly error prone when
> > * called from phy_disconnect() synchronously.
> > */
> > - if (phy_polling_mode(phydev) && phy_is_started(phydev))
> > - phy_queue_state_machine(phydev,
> > - phy_get_next_update_time(phydev));
> > + if (phy_polling_mode(phydev) && phy_is_started(phydev)) {
> > + unsigned int next_time = phy_get_next_update_time(phydev);
> > +
> > + /* Drivers returning PHY_STATE_IRQ opt out of polling.
> > + * Use IRQ-only mode by not re-queuing the state machine.
> > + */
> > + if (next_time != PHY_STATE_IRQ)
> > + phy_queue_state_machine(phydev, next_time);
> > + }
>
> How does this interact with update_stats()?
>
> phy_polling_mode() returns true because the update_stats() op is
> implemented. phy_get_next_update_time() returns PHY_STATE_IRQ, because
> the PHY is in a state where interrupts works, and then the statistics
> overflow.
>
> It seems like this code needs to be somehow made part of
> phy_polling_mode(), so that it has the full picture of why polling is
> being used.
Ah, good point! I forgot about it.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-09 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-09 10:42 [PATCH net v2 0/3] net: phy: smsc: use IRQ + relaxed polling to fix missed link-up Oleksij Rempel
2025-07-09 10:42 ` [PATCH net v2 1/3] net: phy: enable polling when driver implements get_next_update_time Oleksij Rempel
2025-07-09 14:03 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-07-09 10:42 ` [PATCH net v2 2/3] net: phy: allow drivers to disable polling via get_next_update_time() Oleksij Rempel
2025-07-09 14:10 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-07-09 15:23 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2025-07-09 10:42 ` [PATCH net v2 3/3] net: phy: smsc: recover missed link-up IRQs on LAN8700 with adaptive polling Oleksij Rempel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aG6Ja_Y9JNKkEon6@pengutronix.de \
--to=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=andre.edich@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®