From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
l.majewski@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] cpufreq: Re-arrange declarations in cpufreq.h
Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 23:43:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2642814.MCfbiQte2U@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomVKac+1c7rNseUKM_RCVaNiFsaioJuW98oLJP5atSaSg@mail.gmail.com>
On Saturday, August 03, 2013 10:43:45 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 3 August 2013 17:19, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> > They are pretty much mixed up. Although generic headers are present but
> > definitions/declarations are present outside them too..
> >
> > This patch just moves stuff up and down to make it look better and consistent.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 370 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 177 insertions(+), 193 deletions(-)
>
> Fixup due to compilation reported by Fengguang's kbuild system:
> [Will post the series again once I receive more comments on it]
OK, thanks. I'm waiting for the update of the whole series, then.
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index a6b97e2..d568f39 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -268,6 +268,19 @@ int cpufreq_unregister_notifier(struct
> notifier_block *nb, unsigned int list);
> void cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> struct cpufreq_freqs *freqs, unsigned int state);
>
> +#else /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
> +static inline int cpufreq_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> + unsigned int list)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static inline int cpufreq_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> + unsigned int list)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* !CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
> +
> /**
> * cpufreq_scale - "old * mult / div" calculation for large values (32-bit-arch
> * safe)
> @@ -282,32 +295,16 @@ static inline unsigned long
> cpufreq_scale(unsigned long old, u_int div,
> u_int mult)
> {
> #if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
> -
> u64 result = ((u64) old) * ((u64) mult);
> do_div(result, div);
> return (unsigned long) result;
>
> #elif BITS_PER_LONG == 64
> -
> unsigned long result = old * ((u64) mult);
> result /= div;
> return result;
> -
> #endif
> -};
> -
> -#else /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
> -static inline int cpufreq_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> - unsigned int list)
> -{
> - return 0;
> }
> -static inline int cpufreq_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> - unsigned int list)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -#endif /* !CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
>
> /*********************************************************************
> * CPUFREQ GOVERNORS *
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-03 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-03 11:49 [PATCH 00/10] CPUFreq: Fixes & Cleanups for 3.12 Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 01/10] cpufreq: Cleanup header files included in core Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 17:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 02/10] cpufreq: Re-arrange declarations in cpufreq.h Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 17:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 21:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 03/10] cpufreq: Give consistent names for struct cpufreq_policy * Viresh Kumar
2013-08-06 13:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-06 14:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 04/10] cpufreq: Use sizeof(*ptr) form for finding size of a struct Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 05/10] cpufreq: Pass policy to cpufreq_add_policy_cpu() Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 06/10] cpufreq: Store cpufreq policies in a list Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 07/10] cpufreq: Use cpufreq_policy_list for iterating over policies Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 08/10] cpufreq: Fix broken usage of governor->owner's refcount Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 12:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 13:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 09/10] cpufreq: Don't use cpufreq_driver->owner's refcount to protect critical sections Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 10/10] cpufreq: Remove struct cpufreq_driver's owner field Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 12:07 ` [PATCH 00/10] CPUFreq: Fixes & Cleanups for 3.12 Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 13:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2642814.MCfbiQte2U@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=l.majewski@samsung.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®