From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
l.majewski@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] cpufreq: Give consistent names for struct cpufreq_policy *
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 16:02:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2873799.lFo4PWMlur@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpon5mUOTt+4Mh5V4+abq0dJQH0MQyc2dAR4kKMjbuytRvw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 07:08:24 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 3 August 2013 17:19, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> > They are named as policy, cur_policy, new_policy, data, etc.. Just name them
> > poicy wherever possible.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 200 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 10 +-
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c | 14 +--
> > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 2 +-
> > 5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
>
> Another Fixup :)
>
> @Rafael: Apart from that I found things to be pretty stable now and
> so I can go ahead with the V2 of this patchset.. And then maybe we
> can get in linux-next so it receives some testing before 3.12.
Yes, please submit.
Thanks,
Rafael
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
> index 1e630d0..7461a88 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
> @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static int cpufreq_stats_create_table(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy,
> {
> unsigned int i, j, count = 0, ret = 0;
> struct cpufreq_stats *stat;
> - struct cpufreq_policy *data;
> + struct cpufreq_policy *current_policy;
> unsigned int alloc_size;
> unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
> if (per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, cpu))
> @@ -203,13 +203,13 @@ static int cpufreq_stats_create_table(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy,
> if ((stat) == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - data = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> - if (data == NULL) {
> + current_policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> + if (current_policy == NULL) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto error_get_fail;
> }
>
> - ret = sysfs_create_group(&data->kobj, &stats_attr_group);
> + ret = sysfs_create_group(¤t_policy->kobj, &stats_attr_group);
> if (ret)
> goto error_out;
>
> @@ -252,10 +252,10 @@ static int cpufreq_stats_create_table(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy,
> stat->last_time = get_jiffies_64();
> stat->last_index = freq_table_get_index(stat, policy->cur);
> spin_unlock(&cpufreq_stats_lock);
> - cpufreq_cpu_put(data);
> + cpufreq_cpu_put(current_policy);
> return 0;
> error_out:
> - cpufreq_cpu_put(data);
> + cpufreq_cpu_put(current_policy);
> error_get_fail:
> kfree(stat);
> per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, cpu) = NULL;
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-06 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-03 11:49 [PATCH 00/10] CPUFreq: Fixes & Cleanups for 3.12 Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 01/10] cpufreq: Cleanup header files included in core Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 17:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 02/10] cpufreq: Re-arrange declarations in cpufreq.h Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 17:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 21:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 03/10] cpufreq: Give consistent names for struct cpufreq_policy * Viresh Kumar
2013-08-06 13:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-06 14:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 04/10] cpufreq: Use sizeof(*ptr) form for finding size of a struct Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 05/10] cpufreq: Pass policy to cpufreq_add_policy_cpu() Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 06/10] cpufreq: Store cpufreq policies in a list Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 07/10] cpufreq: Use cpufreq_policy_list for iterating over policies Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 08/10] cpufreq: Fix broken usage of governor->owner's refcount Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 12:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 13:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 09/10] cpufreq: Don't use cpufreq_driver->owner's refcount to protect critical sections Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 11:49 ` [PATCH 10/10] cpufreq: Remove struct cpufreq_driver's owner field Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 12:07 ` [PATCH 00/10] CPUFreq: Fixes & Cleanups for 3.12 Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-03 13:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-03 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2873799.lFo4PWMlur@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=l.majewski@samsung.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®