From: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
To: Ben Boeckel <me@benboeckel.net>
Cc: "open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"herbert@gondor.apana.org.au" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>,
"Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>,
"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
"Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
"Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
"Dmitry Kasatkin" <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"casey@schaufler-ca.com" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
"Stefan Berger" <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>,
"ebiggers@kernel.org" <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"keyrings@vger.kernel.org" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 05/13] clavis: Introduce a new key type called clavis_key_acl
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:42:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2F718293-72DA-4E7F-99FF-690276B94F34@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZxHwaGeDCBSp3Dzx@farprobe>
> On Oct 17, 2024, at 11:21 PM, Ben Boeckel <me@benboeckel.net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 09:55:08 -0600, Eric Snowberg wrote:
>> Introduce a new key type for keyring access control. The new key type
>> is called clavis_key_acl. The clavis_key_acl contains the subject key
>> identifier along with the allowed usage type for the key.
>>
>> The format is as follows:
>>
>> XX:YYYYYYYYYYY
>>
>> XX - Single byte of the key type
>> VERIFYING_MODULE_SIGNATURE 00
>> VERIFYING_FIRMWARE_SIGNATURE 01
>> VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE 02
>> VERIFYING_KEY_SIGNATURE 03
>> VERIFYING_KEY_SELF_SIGNATURE 04
>> VERIFYING_UNSPECIFIED_SIGNATURE 05
>> : - ASCII colon
>> YY - Even number of hexadecimal characters representing the key id
>
> This is expected to be *lowercase* hexadecimal characters in the code;
> can that restriction please be documented? (Coming back here, there is a
> `tolower` pass performed when copying from userspace, so this seems to
> be an internal requirement, not userspace.
Correct
> Might be worth documenting
> somewhere in case the kernel wants to make such a key internally.)
>
> I also see a 32-byte (64 hex characters) limit in the code; that should
> also be documented somewhere.
I didn't want to burden the end-user with getting everything in
lowercase, since OpenSSL typically returns the result in uppercase.
I will add some comments as you suggested incase the kernel
wants to make such a key internally.
>> This key type will be used in the clavis keyring for access control. To
>> be added to the clavis keyring, the clavis_key_acl must be S/MIME signed
>> by the sole asymmetric key contained within it.
>>
>> Below is an example of how this could be used. Within the example, the
>> key (b360d113c848ace3f1e6a80060b43d1206f0487d) is already in the machine
>> keyring. The intended usage for this key is to validate a signed kernel
>> for kexec:
>>
>> echo "02:b360d113c848ace3f1e6a80060b43d1206f0487d" > kernel-acl.txt
>>
>> The next step is to sign it:
>>
>> openssl smime -sign -signer clavis-lsm.x509 -inkey clavis-lsm.priv -in \
>> kernel-acl.txt -out kernel-acl.pkcs7 -binary -outform DER \
>> -nodetach -noattr
>>
>> The final step is how to add the acl to the .clavis keyring:
>>
>> keyctl padd clavis_key_acl "" %:.clavis < kernel-acl.pkcs7
>>
>> Afterwards the new clavis_key_acl can be seen in the .clavis keyring:
>>
>> keyctl show %:.clavis
>> Keyring
>> keyring: .clavis
>> \_ asymmetric: Clavis LSM key: 4a00ab9f35c9dc3aed7c225d22bafcbd9285e1e8
>> \_ clavis_key_acl: 02:b360d113c848ace3f1e6a80060b43d1206f0487d
>
> Can this be committed to `Documentation/` and not just the Git history
> please?
This is documented, but it doesn't come in until the 8th patch in the series.
Hopefully that is not an issue.
> Code comments inline below.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> security/clavis/clavis.h | 1 +
>> security/clavis/clavis_keyring.c | 173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 174 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/security/clavis/clavis.h b/security/clavis/clavis.h
>> index 5e397b55a60a..7b55a6050440 100644
>> --- a/security/clavis/clavis.h
>> +++ b/security/clavis/clavis.h
>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>>
>> /* Max length for the asymmetric key id contained on the boot param */
>> #define CLAVIS_BIN_KID_MAX 32
>> +#define CLAVIS_ASCII_KID_MAX 64
>>
>> struct asymmetric_setup_kid {
>> struct asymmetric_key_id id;
>> diff --git a/security/clavis/clavis_keyring.c b/security/clavis/clavis_keyring.c
>> index 400ed455a3a2..00163e7f0fe9 100644
>> --- a/security/clavis/clavis_keyring.c
>> +++ b/security/clavis/clavis_keyring.c
>> @@ -2,8 +2,12 @@
>>
>> #include <linux/security.h>
>> #include <linux/integrity.h>
>> +#include <linux/ctype.h>
>> #include <keys/asymmetric-type.h>
>> +#include <keys/asymmetric-subtype.h>
>> #include <keys/system_keyring.h>
>> +#include <keys/user-type.h>
>> +#include <crypto/pkcs7.h>
>> #include "clavis.h"
>>
>> static struct key *clavis_keyring;
>> @@ -11,10 +15,173 @@ static struct asymmetric_key_id *clavis_boot_akid;
>> static struct asymmetric_setup_kid clavis_setup_akid;
>> static bool clavis_enforced;
>>
>> +static int pkcs7_preparse_content(void *ctx, const void *data, size_t len, size_t asn1hdrlen)
>> +{
>> + struct key_preparsed_payload *prep = ctx;
>> + const void *saved_prep_data;
>> + size_t saved_prep_datalen;
>> + char *desc;
>> + int ret, i;
>> +
>> + /* key_acl_free_preparse will free this */
>> + desc = kmemdup(data, len, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!desc)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + /* Copy the user supplied contents and remove any white space. */
>> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>> + desc[i] = tolower(desc[i]);
>
> Ah, looking here it seems that userspace can provide upper or lowercase.
> THat this is being performed should be added to the comment here.
I'll update the comment.
>
>> + if (isspace(desc[i]))
>> + desc[i] = 0;
>
> How is setting a space to `0` *removing* it? Surely the `isxdigit` check
> internally is going to reject this. Perhaps you meant to have two
> indices into `desc`, one read and one write and to stall the write index
> as long as we're reading whitespace?
>
> Also, that whitespace is stripped is a userspace-relevant detail that
> should be documented.
This was done incase the end-user has a trailing carriage return at the
end of their ACL. I have updated the comment as follows:
+ /*
+ * Copy the user supplied contents, if uppercase is used, convert it to
+ * lowercase. Also if the end of the ACL contains any whitespace, strip
+ * it out.
+ */
>
>> +static void key_acl_destroy(struct key *key)
>> +{
>> + /* It should not be possible to get here */
>> + pr_info("destroy clavis_key_acl denied\n");
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void key_acl_revoke(struct key *key)
>> +{
>> + /* It should not be possible to get here */
>> + pr_info("revoke clavis_key_acl denied\n");
>> +}
>
> These keys cannot be destroyed or revoked? This seems…novel to me. What
> if there's a timeout on the key? If such keys are immortal, timeouts
> should also be refused?
All the system kernel keyrings work this way. But now that you bring this up, neither of
these functions are really necessary, so I will remove them in the next round.
>> +static int key_acl_vet_description(const char *desc)
>> +{
>> + int i, desc_len;
>> + s16 ktype;
>> +
>> + if (!desc)
>> + goto invalid;
>> +
>> + desc_len = sizeof(desc);
>
> This should be `strlen`, no?
I will change this to strlen
>> + /*
>> + * clavis_acl format:
>> + * xx:yyyy...
>> + *
>> + * xx - Single byte of the key type
>> + * : - Ascii colon
>> + * yyyy.. - Even number of hexadecimal characters representing the keyid
>> + */
>> +
>> + /* The min clavis acl is 7 characters. */
>> + if (desc_len < 7)
>> + goto invalid;
>> +
>> + /* Check the first byte is a valid key type. */
>> + if (sscanf(desc, "%2hx", &ktype) != 1)
>> + goto invalid;
>> +
>> + if (ktype >= VERIFYING_CLAVIS_SIGNATURE)
>> + goto invalid;
>> +
>> + /* Check that there is a colon following the key type */
>> + if (desc[2] != ':')
>> + goto invalid;
>> +
>> + /* Move past the colon. */
>> + desc += 3;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; *desc && i < CLAVIS_ASCII_KID_MAX; desc++, i++) {
>> + /* Check if lowercase hex number */
>> + if (!isxdigit(*desc) || isupper(*desc))
>> + goto invalid;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Check if the has is greater than CLAVIS_ASCII_KID_MAX. */
>> + if (*desc)
>> + goto invalid;
>> +
>> + /* Check for even number of hex characters. */
>> + if (i == 0 || i & 1)
>
> FWIW< the `i == 0` is impossible due to the `desc_len < 7` check above
> (well, once `strlen` is used…).
and remove the unnecessary check. Thanks for your review.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-18 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-17 15:55 [RFC PATCH v3 00/13] Clavis LSM Eric Snowberg
2024-10-17 15:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/13] certs: Remove CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING check Eric Snowberg
2024-10-17 16:13 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-10-17 16:50 ` Eric Snowberg
2024-12-23 13:21 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-01-03 23:15 ` Eric Snowberg
2024-10-17 15:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/13] certs: Introduce ability to link to a system key Eric Snowberg
2024-10-17 16:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-10-17 16:53 ` Eric Snowberg
2024-12-23 16:11 ` Mimi Zohar
2024-10-17 15:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/13] clavis: Introduce a new system keyring called clavis Eric Snowberg
2024-10-17 16:50 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-10-17 20:34 ` Eric Snowberg
2024-10-17 21:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-12-24 0:01 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-01-03 23:27 ` Eric Snowberg
2025-01-05 11:43 ` Mimi Zohar
2024-10-17 15:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/13] keys: Add new verification type (VERIFYING_CLAVIS_SIGNATURE) Eric Snowberg
2024-10-17 19:20 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-10-17 21:42 ` Eric Snowberg
2024-10-17 21:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-12-24 0:17 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-01-03 23:28 ` Eric Snowberg
2024-10-17 15:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/13] clavis: Introduce a new key type called clavis_key_acl Eric Snowberg
2024-10-18 5:21 ` Ben Boeckel
2024-10-18 15:42 ` Eric Snowberg [this message]
2024-10-18 16:55 ` Ben Boeckel
2024-10-18 21:55 ` Eric Snowberg
2024-10-17 15:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/13] clavis: Populate clavis keyring acl with kernel module signature Eric Snowberg
2024-10-17 19:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-10-17 15:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/13] keys: Add ability to track intended usage of the public key Eric Snowberg
2025-02-06 20:13 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-02-07 23:09 ` Eric Snowberg
2025-02-12 12:42 ` Mimi Zohar
2024-10-17 15:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/13] clavis: Introduce new LSM called clavis Eric Snowberg
2024-10-23 2:25 ` sergeh
2024-10-23 19:25 ` Eric Snowberg
2024-10-24 19:57 ` sergeh
2024-12-24 17:43 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-01-03 23:32 ` Eric Snowberg
2025-01-05 12:59 ` Mimi Zohar
2024-10-17 15:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/13] clavis: Allow user to define acl at build time Eric Snowberg
2024-10-17 15:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/13] efi: Make clavis boot param persist across kexec Eric Snowberg
2024-10-17 15:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/13] clavis: Prevent boot param change during kexec Eric Snowberg
2024-10-17 15:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/13] clavis: Add function redirection for Kunit support Eric Snowberg
2024-10-17 15:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/13] clavis: " Eric Snowberg
2024-12-24 1:11 ` Mimi Zohar
2024-12-23 12:09 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/13] Clavis LSM Mimi Zohar
2025-01-03 23:14 ` Eric Snowberg
2025-01-04 4:48 ` Paul Moore
2025-01-06 3:40 ` Paul Moore
2025-01-06 17:15 ` Eric Snowberg
2025-02-27 20:41 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-02-27 22:22 ` Paul Moore
2025-02-28 14:08 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-02-28 16:14 ` Paul Moore
2025-02-28 17:18 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-03-03 22:38 ` Paul Moore
2025-03-04 12:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-03-05 0:19 ` Paul Moore
2025-03-05 1:49 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-03-05 2:09 ` Paul Moore
2025-03-05 2:20 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-03-05 2:24 ` Paul Moore
2025-02-28 17:51 ` Eric Snowberg
2025-03-03 22:40 ` Paul Moore
2025-03-04 14:46 ` Eric Snowberg
2025-03-05 0:23 ` Paul Moore
2025-03-05 21:29 ` Eric Snowberg
2025-03-06 1:12 ` Paul Moore
2025-03-06 22:28 ` Eric Snowberg
2025-03-07 2:46 ` Paul Moore
2025-03-20 16:24 ` Eric Snowberg
2025-03-20 21:36 ` Paul Moore
2025-03-21 16:37 ` Eric Snowberg
2025-03-21 18:57 ` Paul Moore
2025-03-21 21:20 ` Eric Snowberg
2025-03-21 22:13 ` Paul Moore
2025-03-21 22:56 ` Eric Snowberg
2025-03-22 2:00 ` Paul Moore
2025-03-21 17:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-03-21 19:05 ` Paul Moore
2025-03-20 22:40 ` James Bottomley
2025-03-21 16:40 ` Eric Snowberg
2025-03-21 16:55 ` James Bottomley
2025-03-21 20:15 ` Eric Snowberg
2025-03-21 20:53 ` James Bottomley
2025-03-24 17:44 ` Eric Snowberg
2025-03-21 17:08 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-03-04 22:24 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-03-05 0:25 ` Paul Moore
2025-03-05 0:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-03-01 2:20 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-03-01 2:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2F718293-72DA-4E7F-99FF-690276B94F34@oracle.com \
--to=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@benboeckel.net \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®