From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
<tony.luck@intel.com>, <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
<james.morse@arm.com>, <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
<babu.moger@amd.com>, <bp@alien8.de>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <fustini@kernel.org>,
<fenghuay@nvidia.com>, <peternewman@google.com>,
<yu.c.chen@intel.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] x86,fs/resctrl: Remove unused non-linear bandwidth delay mapping
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 16:07:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b7e4de7-ad06-40a1-92e0-479b3d7812af@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <103c954ead8905b3582b6ade76e2082dffb01fc6.1791406459.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com>
在 2026/10/8 5:06, Reinette Chatre 写道:
> Intel MBA throttles memory bandwidth with delay values, while resctrl
> exposes memory bandwidth to user space as a percentage. When delay values
> are linear there is a direct mapping between the two. Support for
> non-linear delay values would need a pre-calibrated table mapping
> percentages to delay values.
>
> Commit
>
> 05b93417ce5b ("x86/intel_rdt/mba: Add primary support for Memory Bandwidth Allocation (MBA)")
>
> added a placeholder for such a table to the resctrl_membw structure, but
> the table was never populated and never read. rdt_get_mb_table(), which
> would provide it, always fails. As a result, an Intel MBA resource with
> non-linear delay values is never marked as capable of allocation, and its
> control values are never written to hardware.
>
> Remove the unused mapping table and fold the linear percentage-to-delay
> conversion into the function that writes the control values to hardware.
>
> Keep the check that delay values are linear as a defensive measure in
> preparation for supporting multiple controls, which turns the memory
> bandwidth control into a generic scalar control that indicates whether it
> requires linear values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes since RFC v1:
> - Also drop separate delay_bw_map() and instead integrate the only
> mapping to when control value is written.
>
> Changes since RFC v2:
> - Rework changelog.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Rewrite changelog, fix subject prefix.
> - Match error message about linear support with similar message during
> enumeration added in next patch.
> - Add Chenyu's Reviewed-by tag
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 23 +++++++----------------
> include/linux/resctrl.h | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index 55214d6fdc49..f9677e52790e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -323,29 +323,20 @@ static void mba_wrmsr_amd(struct msr_param *m)
> wrmsrq(hw_res->msr_base + i, hw_dom->ctrl_val[i]);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Map the memory b/w percentage value to delay values
> - * that can be written to QOS_MSRs.
> - * There are currently no SKUs which support non linear delay values.
> - */
> -static u32 delay_bw_map(unsigned long bw, struct rdt_resource *r)
> -{
> - if (r->membw.delay_linear)
> - return MAX_MBA_BW - bw;
> -
> - pr_warn_once("Non Linear delay-bw map not supported but queried\n");
> - return MAX_MBA_BW;
> -}
> -
> static void mba_wrmsr_intel(struct msr_param *m)
> {
> struct rdt_hw_ctrl_domain *hw_dom = resctrl_to_arch_ctrl_dom(m->dom);
> struct rdt_hw_resource *hw_res = resctrl_to_arch_res(m->res);
> unsigned int i;
>
> - /* Write the delay values for mba. */
> + if (!m->res->membw.delay_linear) {
> + pr_warn_once("Non-linear MBA delay values not supported\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* Program bandwidth percentage mapped to linear delay value. */
> for (i = m->low; i < m->high; i++)
> - wrmsrq(hw_res->msr_base + i, delay_bw_map(hw_dom->ctrl_val[i], m->res));
> + wrmsrq(hw_res->msr_base + i, MAX_MBA_BW - hw_dom->ctrl_val[i]);
LGTM
Reviewed-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> }
>
> static void cat_wrmsr(struct msr_param *m)
> diff --git a/include/linux/resctrl.h b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> index 10dfdca7f4bf..b63dc62690ca 100644
> --- a/include/linux/resctrl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/resctrl.h
> @@ -253,7 +253,6 @@ enum membw_throttle_mode {
> * @throttle_mode: Bandwidth throttling mode when threads request
> * different memory bandwidths
> * @mba_sc: True if MBA software controller(mba_sc) is enabled
> - * @mb_map: Mapping of memory B/W percentage to memory B/W delay
> */
> struct resctrl_membw {
> u32 min_bw;
> @@ -263,7 +262,6 @@ struct resctrl_membw {
> bool arch_needs_linear;
> enum membw_throttle_mode throttle_mode;
> bool mba_sc;
> - u32 *mb_map;
> };
>
> struct resctrl_schema;
--
Best regards,
Jinjie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-07 21:06 [PATCH v2 0/5] x86,fs/resctrl: Cleanups in preparation for multiple controls support Reinette Chatre
2026-10-07 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] x86,fs/resctrl: Remove unused non-linear bandwidth delay mapping Reinette Chatre
2026-10-27 8:07 ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2026-10-07 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] x86,fs/resctrl: Remove unnecessary non-linear MBA configuration check Reinette Chatre
2026-10-08 7:14 ` Chen Yu
2026-10-27 8:29 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-10-07 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] x86,fs/resctrl: Move MSR_IA32_L{2,3}_QOS_CFG scope property to x86 resource Reinette Chatre
2026-10-18 17:40 ` Chen Yu
2026-10-19 23:06 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-20 6:05 ` Chen Yu
2026-10-20 21:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-07 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] fs/resctrl: Drop unnecessary is_mba_linear() helper Reinette Chatre
2026-10-27 8:34 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-10-07 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] fs/resctrl: Drop unnecessary parameter from resctrl_io_alloc_parse_line() Reinette Chatre
2026-10-18 17:44 ` Chen Yu
2026-10-27 8:35 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-10-27 14:36 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-08 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] x86,fs/resctrl: Cleanups in preparation for multiple controls support Luck, Tony
2026-10-08 22:48 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2b7e4de7-ad06-40a1-92e0-479b3d7812af@huawei.com \
--to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=fustini@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®