mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] IDE fixes
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:02:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c0942db0904221502x266b66far303102c019e5e0cb@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200904222341.37846.bzolnier@gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 April 2009 21:55:03 Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 21:43 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> > IMO we should just remove extra commas and add some whitespaces.
>>
>> Your choice.
>> Ignore, reject, accept, improve, fine by me.
>>
>> > I have also more general (process oriented) comment:
>> >
>> > All patches have been posted to linux-kernel or linux-ide for review before
>> > and it is _much_ more efficient to raise issues (including CodingStyle ones)
>> > during "review phase" instead of during "push to Linus" phase.
>>
>> Maybe for you, but I'm an intermittent
>> and random reader.
>
> For everybody involved in the process -- this includes you.
>
> I'm not the original author of many patches so I simply cannot be
> correcting every single issue because:
>
> a) it is physically impossible
>
> b) it doesn't really educate people

His point is that you can queue a follow-up patch to remove the
ugliness. Just because it didn't get caught until the push stage
doesn't mean the code needs to stay set in stone for the rest of
eternity.

What most maintainers do at this stage is say "Great idea! Send me a
patch." Perhaps you could try that tack instead.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-22 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-22 18:48 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 19:06 ` Joe Perches
2009-04-22 19:22   ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-22 19:43   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 19:55     ` Joe Perches
2009-04-22 21:41       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 22:02         ` Ray Lee [this message]
2009-04-22 22:51           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 22:58           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-07 12:44 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 14:21 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 14:32   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 14:40     ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 15:03       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 15:11         ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 14:38   ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 14:57     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 15:18       ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 15:44         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 16:08           ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 17:47             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 19:08               ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 19:23                 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 20:07                 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 20:39                   ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 21:08                     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 20:42                   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 16:54           ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-07 17:55             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 18:21               ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-07 19:00                 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 19:09                   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-07 19:25                     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 23:15                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-07 23:47                         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 23:57                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-08  0:54                             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 23:14               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-07 23:12       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-22 15:17 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-16 19:16 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-16 19:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-16 19:33   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-18 16:09 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-13 20:49 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-05 15:30 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-05 16:27 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-02-25 19:54 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-02-02 19:48 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-19 12:50 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-22 22:08 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-08 16:55 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-05 16:38 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-27 17:47 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-10 20:47 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-02 18:24 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-08-18 20:22 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-07-08 17:38 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2c0942db0904221502x266b66far303102c019e5e0cb@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®