From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] IDE fixes
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 22:09:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84144f020906071209m51e5fd15jaa67f9143ab1d126@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906072100.10649.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Hi Bartlomiej,
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > My honest opinion is that it is as appropriate now as it will be 2.6.31.
>> >
>> > [ I'm still amazed by the amount of *completely* bogus reasons given for
>> > not merging it. ]
>>
>> I don't consider this a bogus reason at all:
>>
>> 10 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> Since when do we validate code quality based solely on LOC changed? :)
Since when we entered -rc8 (or even earlier).
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm yet to see anybody posting a single code chunk in this whole discussion.
That's because I am not objecting to the code. I am objecting to the
fact that you're submitting something as big as this so late in the
release cycle and the fact that it's not a clear-cut bug fix.
But anyway, I don't really want to argue about this. I simply wanted
to point out that I agree with Alan's and James' comments and that I
don't think they have anything to do with "slowing down IDE fixes" but
rather with how the whole release cycle with fixed merge window works.
Pekka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-07 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-07 12:44 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 14:21 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 14:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 14:40 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 15:03 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 15:11 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 14:38 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 14:57 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 15:18 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 15:44 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 16:08 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 17:47 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 19:08 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 19:23 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 20:07 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 20:39 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 21:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 20:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 16:54 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-07 17:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 18:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-07 19:00 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 19:09 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2009-06-07 19:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 23:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-07 23:47 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 23:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-08 0:54 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-07 23:12 ` Linus Torvalds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-22 15:17 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-16 19:16 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-16 19:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-16 19:33 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 18:48 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 19:06 ` Joe Perches
2009-04-22 19:22 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-22 19:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 19:55 ` Joe Perches
2009-04-22 21:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 22:02 ` Ray Lee
2009-04-22 22:51 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 22:58 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-18 16:09 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-13 20:49 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-05 15:30 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-05 16:27 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-02-25 19:54 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-02-02 19:48 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-19 12:50 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-22 22:08 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-08 16:55 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-05 16:38 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-27 17:47 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-10 20:47 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-02 18:24 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-08-18 20:22 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-07-08 17:38 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84144f020906071209m51e5fd15jaa67f9143ab1d126@mail.gmail.com \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®